Club Adventist
Welcome with open arms fellow believers who don’t see things the way you do.
And don’t jump all over them every time they do or say something you don’t agree with
– even when it seems that they are strong on opinions but weak in the faith department.
Remember, they have their own history to deal with. Treat them gently. Romans 14.1: The Message
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#130994 - 06/22/07 08:33 PM Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith
A_G_Brito Moderator Offline


Registered: 04/28/07
Posts: 127

Ratzlaff’s Concern With Those Who Abandon the Faith -- A Wider Problem Than He Thinks

In a previous edition of his Proclamation magazine Mr. Ratzlaff expresses great preoccupation with a proportionately large number of Seventh-day Adventists who, after a time, leave the Church. He seems to keep thinking of his ministry as the most valid alternative for this kind of people (besides those who already belong to the Church and are living their faith faithfully, who he wants to woo to his “new alliance” supposedly superior understanding of the Scriptures).

Now, it is really regrettable that so many leave the ranks of the SDA Church every year. But we should remember that a church with the fast growth and intense evangelistic efforts like the SDA Church runs this risk most unavoidably. Many join the church through public evangelism campaigns and often are more enthused than converted, and sooner or later give up their faith for a series of reasons. Besides, being a Seventh-day Adventist represents to face challenges and restrictions that others don’t experience. Barriers to the practice of their faith are much bigger than for those belonging to other more easy-to-follow churches (Sabbath keeping, dietary rules, tithing, etc.).

However, the problem is that even in other more “stable” and easy-to-follow churches, that don’t promote all these evangelistic campaigns and don’t have large number of baptisms, as happens with our Church, the problem with defection is also worrisome.

One Hispanic congregation in our area, with which I contribute preaching to their congregation every second Sabbath, had to rent the premises of a Baptist church for their Sabbath services until they concluded negotiations for the acquisition of their own temple. I met the Baptist church Pastor there who went to attend our meetings as courtesy, or to serve in any needed support for the use of the installations and equipments, and I asked him: “How many members do you have here in your church?” He answered candidly: “In the books they are 250, but only about 50 or 60 attend church regularly. I don’t know where the others are. . .”

A recent piece of news in our area’s main newspaper, The Birmingham News, reproduced a news dispatch from the Associated Press that has as title, “Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Shrinking”. And, the main body of the information:

Louisville, Ky, (AP) – Membership in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) declined again last year, dropping by more than 46.000 in 2006, the denomination says. The number of active Presbyterians fell from 2,313,662 in 2005, to 2,267,118 in 2006, according to an annual church survey released June 7. . . . In addition, the number of congregations fell by 56 to 10,903.
Like other mainline Protestant denominations, the Presbyterians have seen membership rolls shrink over the last couple of decades. In 2004 and 2005 alone, the denomination lost 48,474 active members.

The latest drop comes as fighting intensifies within the church over how Presbyterians should interpret Scripture. Congregants are divided over whether the Bible bars gay relationships, among other theological issues. – The Birmingham News, June 15, 2007, page 4-H.


So, if Mr. Ratzlaff is concerned with those who left their Churches, the field is really very ample for him to act about. He doesn’t have to concentrate on Seventh-day Adventists.
May be his own “new alliance” members could lose their initial enthusiasm after they discover his poor articulation of the gospel theme and that what he teaches is not even in accordance with the traditional doctrines of Protestantism, as we have stressed in previous analyses of his SDA-centered “evangelistic” efforts.

So, maybe he should take better care of his own fold, providing them consistent instruction that doesn’t represent new and dysfunctional ideas, alien to what is the real understanding of the gospel and law relationship throughout the centuries by the most representative Protestant-Evangelical confessional documents and leading instructors in that milieu.

Now, the May/June edition of Proclamation magazine (2007) again brings some testimonies of SDA Adventists who abandoned their faith because they discovered the supposedly “new alliance” message, which inspired them and led them to discover the true meaning of the gospel.

But, one question arises at this point: what is the true meaning of the gospel? How about this?:

The Bible makes it clear that our walk with Christ doesn’t end on the day of conversion. On the contrary, when people give themselves totally to Christ, they begin a whole new life, a whole new existence (Rom. 6:4). It’s not that a new Christian has to work to reach salvation, as in other faiths; instead, because he or she already has salvation, already stands perfect and accepted in God, the Christian begins to live a life that reveals and reflects that salvation. Sure, we are saved by faith, but what kind of faith? A faith that is expressed in a life that reveals a commitment to Jesus Christ.

Central to our new life in Christ is spiritual growth. As Christians, we can’t remain static: We are always in the process of change as we should better reflect the image of Jesus Christ. And crucial to the whole growth process is the Word of God, which shows us how and why we must “grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Pet. 3:18, NIV). – Adult Teachers Sabbath School Bible Study Guide, Lesson 12, “Growing Through the Word”, p. 137.


Millions of Seventh-day Adventists around the world studied this lesson, which reflects exactly what is the Church’s official teaching. Again we wonder: Is there any need for someone to leave the SDA Church to encounter somewhere else these important truths, with which Mr. Ratzlaff and his followers certainly would agree? Or wouldn’t? If not, why not? What is wrong in that statement that would disqualify it as a real Christ-centered and gospel based language? I wonder what failure in terms of transmitting the real meaning of what it means to be a Christian is lacking in these two paragraphs, that introduces Lesson 12 of the referred to Sabbath School quarterly.

Next we will analyze Mrs. Colleen Tinker’s real exercise in intellectual dishonesty in her assessment of the Church’s and, especially, Ellen G. White’s development of the Divinity issue in the article she wrote, "Discovering the Adventist Jesus".



Top
#131175 - 06/23/07 11:13 PM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: Shane]
John317 Online   content


Registered: 11/13/05
Posts: 9103
Loc: CA
 Originally Posted By: Shane
Some of Adventists worst enemies are ex-Adventists.


Shane, a long time ago I remember reading that former Adventists, and even former SDA pastors or Bible teachers, would become our worst enemies. Ellen White said the same thing. And once, as a kid, I saw a play based on Mary Kay's little book about the end-times. I could hardly imagine such a thing happening-- I mean being ridiculed and quetioned harshly by former SDA. But now I can understand it completely, sad to say. I "see" so many who talk as if they hate the Sabbath and virtually everything Adventists represent. And almost all of these used to be one of us, at least in name.

See GC 608-- "When Sabbathkeepers ae brought before the courts to answer for their faith, these (former Sabbath-keeping] apostates are the most efficient agents of Satan to misrepresent and accuse them, and by false reports and insinuations to stir up the rulers against them." Imagine your shock when you see a famous SDA pastor or maybe your Bible teacher coming to interrogate you and telling you how wrong you are about the Sabbath, etc.


Edited by John317 (06/23/07 11:17 PM)
_________________________
Turning and turning in the widening gyre/ The falcon cannot hear the falconer;/ things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world... Surely some revelation is at hand;/Surely the Second Coming is at hand. W.B. Yeats


Top
#131192 - 06/24/07 12:27 AM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: olger]
John317 Online   content


Registered: 11/13/05
Posts: 9103
Loc: CA
 Originally Posted By: olger
A common denominator I have observed among disgruntled Adventists who attack the "church" is unresolved bitterness towards individuals. This can lead a person to begin reacting to the "church."

...Question: How many angry people does it take to get anger flowing through a church fellowship? Just one, friend. Just one. og


Ellen White makes statements about how God is not the only one who wants to see people baptized and joining the SDA church. She says Satan also likes to see unconverted people joining because he knows he can then work through them to influence others.

I think it's just so important that we all be sure we are kind and loving toward everyone so we cannot possibly be blamed for someone's bitterness. No doubt all of us probably have reasons we could be bitter if we didn't let the Holy Spirit change our hearts in order to be forgiving and loving toward everyone.
_________________________
Turning and turning in the widening gyre/ The falcon cannot hear the falconer;/ things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world... Surely some revelation is at hand;/Surely the Second Coming is at hand. W.B. Yeats


Top
#131211 - 06/24/07 02:28 AM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: John317]
olger Online   content


Registered: 12/27/05
Posts: 2961
Loc: Ohio
 Originally Posted By: John317
 Originally Posted By: olger
A common denominator I have observed among disgruntled Adventists who attack the "church" is unresolved bitterness towards individuals. This can lead a person to begin reacting to the "church."

...Question: How many angry people does it take to get anger flowing through a church fellowship? Just one, friend. Just one. og


Ellen White makes statements about how God is not the only one who wants to see people baptized and joining the SDA church. She says Satan also likes to see unconverted people joining because he knows he can then work through them to influence others.

I think it's just so important that we all be sure we are kind and loving toward everyone so we cannot possibly be blamed for someone's bitterness. No doubt all of us probably have reasons we could be bitter if we didn't let the Holy Spirit change our hearts in order to be forgiving and loving toward everyone.


Ellen White must have been inspired to write something like that.

I spoke to a lady last week who said she cannot read ellen white and threw all her books away 25-years ago. She also questioned some parts of the Bible. The adventist church's answer to this woman? They made her an "elder."


True story,


olger

(I can't put into words how weak the church is in doing such things. It leaves me speechless).

Top
#131220 - 06/24/07 03:01 AM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: olger]
A_G_Brito Moderator Offline


Registered: 04/28/07
Posts: 127

hi dear brothers and friends

Thank you for your excellent comments. This is the only place where I got this kind of feedback out of the 5 different forums where I have posted this material (01 in Spanish). But it doesn't matter. My main concern is that the material be read by as many people as possible.

Well, among the things Bro. Shane listed that are not "salvation decisive" I would add believing in the investigative judgment, because the subject of God's judgment has so many different interpretations in the Christian field. So, who has the final word on how exactly God will proceed judging everyone of us and all the world? Nobody will lose his/her salvation for believing that the judgment will be this way or that way.

Actually there is a false propaganda regarding SDA's living wringing their hands in anxiety for not knowing if their names have been scrutinized in the Heavenly Sanctuary. . . Do any of you guys live under that stressing sentiment? The true is that in 41 years of SDA Church affiliation I never met one single brother or sister who harbors these terrible feelings. . .

About Ellen White, yes, there are some hard things to understand in her writings, but if we examine the material of ex-Evangelical pastor Dan Barker who became an atheist, and the way he disputes the Bible, exploring its supposed "contradictions", then we will understand how far we are from understanding how inspiration really works. The problems and contradictions these anti-Christian folks point in the Bible are about the same these critics of Ellen White present regarding her writings.

Now, I think that one reason many people leave the church to enter these "new alliance" movements is because they read that text of Jesus telling those who want to follow Him that there is a cross to bear. But Jesus doesn't specify what material this cross is made of--wood, iron, gold, silver, plumb? Then they reason: "Well, since Jesus didn't tell what material the cross should be made of, who knows one made of Styrofoam wouldn't do? After all, if we paint it as a genuine one, who will tell the difference?"

And the number of people carrying Styrofoam crosses around is legion. . .

Have a nice week.

God bless you all.

Top
#131246 - 06/24/07 05:58 AM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: A_G_Brito]
John317 Online   content


Registered: 11/13/05
Posts: 9103
Loc: CA
 Originally Posted By: A_G_Brito

hi dear brothers and friends

Thank you for your excellent comments. This is the only place where I got this kind of feedback out of the 5 different forums where I have posted this material (01 in Spanish). But it doesn't matter. My main concern is that the material be read by as many people as possible.

Well, among the things Bro. Shane listed that are not "salvation decisive" I would add believing in the investigative judgment, because the subject of God's judgment has so many different interpretations in the Christian field. So, who has the final word on how exactly God will proceed judging everyone of us and all the world? Nobody will lose his/her salvation for believing that the judgment will be this way or that way.


But not believing in the Investigative Judgment has led many people to finally give up completely on Ellen White as a true prophet, and then to give up on the Sabbath, and finally give up on Christianity itself. Also, since Ellen White teaches very clearly about the Investigative Judgment, if she was "mistaken" about it, then I personally doubt she can be trusted about anything. The Bible says if she was wrong about things she said, it proves she was a false prophet and as such she should be killed. That is very strong language yet true.

Do you believe the book, The Great Controversy, particularly the chapters, "What is the Sanctuary," " In the Holy of Holies," "Facing Life's Record"?

 Quote:
Actually there is a false propaganda regarding SDA's living wringing their hands in anxiety for not knowing if their names have been scrutinized in the Heavenly Sanctuary. . . Do any of you guys live under that stressing sentiment? The true is that in 41 years of SDA Church affiliation I never met one single brother or sister who harbors these terrible feelings. . .


Yes, most of this is false propaganda but at the same time it must be admitted that as a church we have not always done very well at communicating the truth of the Pre-Advent Judgment. As I grew up SDA, I had a good friend who worried constantly about the "time of trouble," and about his salvation. He would ask about the time of trouble several times a month, and when we would assure him of the Bible promises as well as the promises of God found in Ellen White's writings, he would be fine for a while; but then he would ask the same questions again. This boy eventually developed serious mental problems, but I am sure they were not the result of his constant worrying about the end-times. Rather, it is more likely that he worried about the end-times because he was emotionally and mentally unstable and therefore could not totally grasp what we were telling him. But it goes to show we need to make sure we are communicating clearly because we never know if people have emotional and mental problems or if they understand what we are saying.

 Quote:
About Ellen White, yes, there are some hard things to understand in her writings, but if we examine the material of ex-Evangelical pastor Dan Barker who became an atheist, and the way he disputes the Bible, exploring its supposed "contradictions", then we will understand how far we are from understanding how inspiration really works. The problems and contradictions these anti-Christian folks point in the Bible are about the same these critics of Ellen White present regarding her writings.


Totally agree.

 Quote:
Now, I think that one reason many people leave the church to enter these "new alliance" movements is because they read that text of Jesus telling those who want to follow Him that there is a cross to bear. But Jesus doesn't specify what material this cross is made of--wood, iron, gold, silver, plumb? Then they reason: "Well, since Jesus didn't tell what material the cross should be made of, who knows one made of Styrofoam wouldn't do? After all, if we paint it as a genuine one, who will tell the difference?"

And the number of people carrying Styrofoam crosses around is legion. . .

Have a nice week.

God bless you all.



That's very well put. Thank you. I'll have to remember the Styrofoam crosses.


Edited by John317 (06/24/07 06:01 AM)
_________________________
Turning and turning in the widening gyre/ The falcon cannot hear the falconer;/ things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world... Surely some revelation is at hand;/Surely the Second Coming is at hand. W.B. Yeats


Top
#131335 - 06/24/07 07:42 PM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: John317]
Gail Administrator Offline
Like leg pains, sometimes it hurts to grow

Registered: 12/10/02
Posts: 13428
Loc: Buon giorno, Principessa
I am amazed at vehement attitude of some against the church, and wonder if some of it has to do with their spirituality before they left.

I fear a lot for those who seem rigid in their beliefs to the point where they do not tolerate others who might not agree or be at their stage of spirituality. I've been around many who notice others' sins and point them out, as if they are tuned to do so.

The reason this worries me is because:

1) I wonder if in fact they are inwardly as hard on themselves as they are on others, and therefore carrying a huge burden, and

2) If one is too rigid, then when confronted with better information or reality which is not their truth (but might be the real truth) there is the possibility that their faith will be at the least sorely tested and at the worst completely disarmed. I have seen people on the extreme conservative just get tired or discouraged and throw out the whole faith.

There should be JOY in our walk with the Lord. He is a God of mercy and blessings to His children. We should not be walking in bitterness, especially if we know we have such light
_________________________
Gail

gail@adventistforum.com

And the work of righteousness shall be peace; and the effect of righteousness quietness and assurance for ever. Isaiah 32:17

Top
#131473 - 06/25/07 04:19 PM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: Gail]
Redwood Online   content
Swiss n Swedish American

Registered: 12/09/06
Posts: 7797
Loc: A citizen of Heaven
Gail ... you bring up some good points and then I think you answer them.

 Quote:
I am amazed at vehement attitude of some against the church, and wonder if some of it has to do with their spirituality before they left.

I fear a lot for those who seem rigid in their beliefs to the point where they do not tolerate others who might not agree or be at their stage of spirituality. I've been around many who notice others' sins and point them out, as if they are tuned to do so.


Those with the bad attitude of the church probably started with good sprituality but then met up with some of those with the attitude that you have described as "rigid" and that do not tolerate those at a different stage of spirituality. They have all their sins pointed out to them and thus are made to feel they do not have salvation unless they are good enough which they have just learned they are not. That would destroy anyone's "good" spirituality.
_________________________
Another one of Woodies Goodies
Our Mama Beats Your Obama.
And don't forget ... Love WON Another.


Redwood

Top
#131474 - 06/25/07 04:21 PM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: Gail]
Redwood Online   content
Swiss n Swedish American

Registered: 12/09/06
Posts: 7797
Loc: A citizen of Heaven
 Quote:
I have seen people on the extreme conservative just get tired or discouraged and throw out the whole faith.


HOW SAD. But this has been my observation also. When the focus is on works ... this is what happens. When the focus is on abiding then you get both faith and works.
_________________________
Another one of Woodies Goodies
Our Mama Beats Your Obama.
And don't forget ... Love WON Another.


Redwood

Top
#132070 - 06/29/07 07:16 PM Re: Some Challenging Questions For a Challenger of Our Faith [Re: Redwood]
A_G_Brito Moderator Offline


Registered: 04/28/07
Posts: 127

“Discovering the Adventist Jesus”—The Contradictory and Confusing Theology of Proclamation Magazine’s Editor


In her article, “Discovering the Adventist Jesus”, Colleen Tinker, who is the editor of Proclamation magazine and a former Seventh-day Adventist, says something very interesting in one of the first paragraphs of her article, recalling something of her religious experience:

“It was May 1996, when Richard and I attended an Adventist Forum meeting in San Diego, California, and heard Dale Ratzlaff explain that the New Covenant, unlike the Old Covenant, was an unconditional promise. Where the Old Covenant promised Israel blessings in exchange for obedience, the New Covenant unilaterally promised that God would write His law on human hearts. This covenant did not depend upon promises of obedience from me. Dale explained that Jesus fulfilled the covenant obligation on behalf of humanity by fulfilling the law, by dying for sin, and by conquering death. In the New Covenant, God’s blessings are ours when we place our trust in Jesus. Our own behavior and performance are not involved in our acceptance into the New Covenant. God Himself makes and keeps the terms of the New Covenant. Jesus represents humanity before the Father, and the New Covenant blessings are ours when we are in Christ”. – Op. Cit., May/June edition, 2007.


Besides the poor theology of that statement, the incredible contradictions found in it shows additionally how confusing is this supposed “new alliance” message of Ratzlaff & Co.

First, Jesus said: “If ye love Me, keep my commandments” (John 14:15), while Mrs. Tinker says that our “own behavior and performance are not involved in our acceptance into the New Covenant”. Now, how someone can keep Jesus’ commandments without involving his/her behavior and “performance” she didn’t explain.

Well, there is that beautiful Evangelical Hymn that really says, “Just as I am, without one plea but that Thy blood was shed for me, and that thou bid’st me come to Thee, O Lamb of God, I come, I come. . .”.

But, another hymn completes the picture: “Trust and obey, for there’s no other way to be happy in Jesus, but to trust and obey. . .”

Both hymns are part of the Seventh-day Adventist Hymnal (respectively ## 590 and 314) and sang regularly in our churches. They simply teach that we go to Jesus just as we are, but that is because He promises to FORGIVE OUR SINS. And, again, let’s not forget the Bible’s definition of sin: “Sin is the transgression of the law” (1 John 3:4). What law? Wouldn’t that be exactly the one that Mrs. Tinker confirms that God writes on human hearts? The context of Heb. 8:10 says that it is “My laws” (God’s), the same that Jeremiah knew, because this text is a mere reproduction of what Jeremiah says in Jer. 31:31-33.

Someone could allege that Jesus, in the context of John 14:15, refers to the commandment of loving one another. That is true, but doesn’t He also imply the other part of His double “golden rule” of loving God above all else and loving the neighbor as oneself? He certainly does. After all, the word “commandments” in John 14:15 is plural. So, it must be, at least, two.

But still we have the law that God writes on human hearts. What law is that? God’s law, certainly. And isn’t God’s law also Christ’s commandments? Isn’t it expressed in the double principle of love to God above all else, and love to the neighbor? For centuries Baptists and Presbyterians say that the first four commandments have to do with our relationship with God, and the last six, the same regarding our neighbor. . . Have they being wrong all that time? I don’t think so. . . Don’t also Mr. Ratzlaff and his followers?

Related to that there is that very special question that I asked Mr. Ratzlaff months ago, and so far he gave me no answer. Who knows his editor-in-chief is better at answering questions? Well, let’s try, then, to address her the same question he snubbed:

Where is it written that in the change from the Old to the New Covenant, when God writes what is called “My laws” in the hearts and minds of those who accept the terms of the New Covenant [New Testament] (Heb. 8:6-10), transferring the contents of the cold tables of stone to the hearts warmed by the divine grace (2 Cor. 3:2-7), He

a – leaves out the 4th commandment of the moral law;

b – includes the 4th commandment, but changing the sanctity of the 7th to the 1st day of the week?

OR

c – includes the 4th commandment, but leaving it as a vague, voluntary and non-obligatory principle that can be reinterpreted as any day or time which is most convenient to the believer (or his employer)?

Basic texts: Hebrews 8:6-10; Jeremiah 31:31-33; Ezekiel 11:19, 20 and 36:26, 27.


Now I will act differently. As I do in some discussion groups and forums, when I address this question to “new alliance” adherents, since they normally show no disposition to answer, preferring rather to continue trying to manipulate the debates through the well-known technique of ignoring questions and questionings, I set a deadline for having it responded. If not, I advise that I will publish what I deem to be the CORRECT ANSWER at the end of the time set. Then, the opponents have two options: a – to accept the answer as correct; b – to refuse it offering convincing arguments to prove that it is not correct.

So, Mrs. Colleen Tinker has 10 days to give us a good and convincing, Bible-based answer. If not, we will offer the CORRECT ANSWER and she has the two options above to deal with.

Now, we find something very strange as we read further Mrs. Tinker understanding of the New Covenant in her article: “God Himself makes and keeps the terms of the New Covenant”.

But a “covenant” is tantamount to a contract, a pact, an alliance, or an agreement. And there are always at least two parties involved in any of such deals. What is she really saying? It seems very confusing on the light of her own context.

Does that mean that God does everything that the New Covenant comprehends, including “our obedience”? Oh, Jesus fulfilled the law for us, of course. But what does that mean, in practical terms?

* Did He fulfill the law of not having other gods? He certainly did. Does that mean we are free for worshipping other gods?

* Did He fulfill the law of not utilizing sculpted image in our acts of worship? He certainly did. Does that mean we are free from obeying this principle? Then the Roman Catholics and members of the Orthodox Church are right, we can’t criticize them for utilizing images and icons in their churches and homes. . .

* Did He fulfill the law of not pronouncing God’s name in vain? He certainly did. Does that mean we are free from obeying this principle?

* Did He fulfill the law of respecting the parents, of not to commit adultery, not to steal, not to give false witness against the neighbor, and so on? He certainly did. Does that mean we are free from obeying all these commandments?

The apostle Paul, the great champion of justification by faith, said something so much different from Mrs. Tinker’s theology to those who live under the new covenant. He wrote to the Romans in the 7th chapter of his epistle to the Christian community there that God’s law is holy, just, good and pleasurable, and that He obeyed it with his mind. That he refers to the 10 Commandments is clear comparing vs. 25 with 7 and 8—it is the law that brings the commandment, “Thou shalt not covet”. Which one is that?

The entire chapter speaks of a new life for those who abandoned sin (remember, “transgression of the law”) and “got married” with the new “husband”, Jesus Christ (vs. 4-6). And this new life is one of struggle against temptation, because, as he adds in the following chapter, “the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God” (Rom. 8:7, 8).

Then, in another paragraph, the author shows how far she was from being a well knowledgeable believer regarding the official teaching of the church she decided to abandon:

“My entire worldview changed at that moment
[as she heard Ratzlaff’s explanation on the contrast between covenants]. Jesus was no longer a piece of the salvation puzzle. Instead, He IS salvation. In order to be saved, all I needed was Jesus. A flood of emotion overflowed in tears, and I felt something completely new: awe, reverence, and love for Jesus”.

She goes on speaking of her lack of knowing the “real” Jesus in Seventh-day Adventism. Another poor lady who missed some important materials that only the SDA Church has to provide its members and the public in general, two magnificent works especially dedicated to lead people to this wonderful Jesus that she alleges having discovered only after she left the SDA Church, to embrace this confusing and contradictory “new alliance” current: Steps to Christ and The Desire of Ages.

Seventh-day Adventists are really privileged to have these books available in their publishing houses and ABC stores. There is no need to discover that “special” Jesus with Ratzlaff or whoever intends to be the “guru” of a new alliance that doesn’t have anything new to tells us regarding the plan of salvation.

For one thing, I already published topics 9, 10 and 18 of our 28 basic beliefs, and there is nothing, but absolutely NOTHING, that Mrs. Tinker alleges about “discovering” the real Jesus that is not part of the mentioned topics, wonderfully enriched by the two books. The first of them had its first editions published by the Evangelical publishing company Revell, because its editor saw its Christ-centered character and evangelistic potential.

After discussing her own feelings and supposed lack of clear understanding of the real Jesus in 7th Day Adventism, she enters a new field, trying to discuss our understanding of the Godhead, presenting a brief history of what the SDA pioneers said about, later dealing with Ellen White’s treatment of the subject, coming to the absurd conclusion that she taught a tritheist Godhead. That is certainly strange, because if she had that view, how come the Church, either in her own time or in the future, never adopted such a position?

For now I will just discuss the first part of her discussion on that, reproducing the introduction of the book Questions on Doctrine, where the problem of the SDA pioneers who dealt with the Divinity question is fully clarified. Later on I will discuss how Mrs. Tinker presents Ellen White dealing with the Godhead in a totally distorted way.


The SDA Pioneers’ Struggle to Form a New Church

The founding fathers of the SDA Church over a century ago came out of various denominational backgrounds. While all were premillennialists, some were Trinitarians, others were Arian. The majority were Arminians; a few were Calvinists. Some insisted on immersion; a few were content with sprinkling. There was diversity on these points. And as with various other religious groups, our early days were characterized by transition and adjustment. As these men were already born-again believers, the initial study and emphasis was placed upon the distinctive teachings of the movement. And they were similarly occupied in developing an effective organization.

In those early years relatively little attention was paid to the respective merits of Arminianism in contrast with the Calvinist position. The historic differences of thought involved had reached back to Augustine and Chrysostom. They did not concern themselves with “absolute decrees”, “divine sovereignty”, “particular election”, or “limited atonement”. Nor did they, at first, seek to define the nature of the Godhead, or the problems of Christology, involving the deity of Christ and His nature during the incarnation; the personality and deity of the Holy Spirit; the nature, scope, and completeness of the atonement; the relationship of law to grace and the fullness of the doctrine of righteousness by faith; and the like.

But with the passage of years the earlier diversity of view on certain doctrines gradually gave way to unity of view. Clear and sound positions were then taken by the great majority on such doctrines as the Godhead, the deity and eternal pre-existence of Christ, and the personality of the Holy Spirit. Clear-cut views were established on righteousness by faith, the true relationship of law and grace, and on the death of Christ as the complete sacrificial atonement for sin.

A few, however, held to some of their former views, and at times these ideas got into print. However, for decades now the church has been practically at one on the basic truths of the Christian faith.

The very fact that our positions were now clarified seemed to us sufficient. Our teachings, we felt, were clear. And no particular statement of change from those earlier ideas appeared necessary. Today the primary emphasis of all our leading denominational literature, as well as the continuous presentation over radio and television, emphasizes the historic fundamentals of the Christian faith.

But the changes and attacks have persisted. Some continue to gather up quotations from some of our earlier literature long since out of date, and print. Certain statements are cited, often wrested out of context, which give a totally distorted picture of the beliefs and teachings of the Seventh-day Adventist Church of today.

Another consideration should be taken into account. Is it that Seventh-day Adventists, having no formal creed, do not rigidly bind the thinking of their ministry. It would be strange indeed if from some Adventist writer there did not appear an occasional statement that was out of line with the consensus of Seventh-day Adventist belief. Most religious bodies face this problem and embarrassment from time to time.

All this has made it desirable and necessary for us to declare our position anew upon the great fundamental teachings of the Christian faith, and to deny every statement or implication that Christ, the second person of the Godhead, was not one with the Father from all eternity, and that His death on the cross was not a full and complete sacrificial atonement. The belief of Seventh-day Adventist on these great truths is clear and emphatic. And we feel that we should not be identified with, or stigmatized for, certain limited and faulty concepts held by some, particularly in our formative years.

The statement should therefore nullify the stock “quotations” that have been circulated against us. We are one with our fellow Christians of denominational groups in the great fundamentals of the faith once delivered to the saints. Our hope is in a crucified, risen, ministering, and soon returning Savior. -– Seventh-day Adventists Answer Questions on Doctrine (Review and Herald Publ. Assn., Washington D.C., 1957), pp. 29-32.
_______

Indeed the different origins of our pioneers explain certain doctrinal points they still adhered to for a time, among which we also can identify what characterized the consensus of the conservative Christian churches: a) The Ten Commandments as God’s law in all their precepts; b) Within the Ten Commandments, its principle of a day of rest derived from the creation of the world, thus being of moral and universal character; c) the divine laws being classified as “moral” (the Decalogue), “ceremonial” (the prefigurative rites of Christ’s atoning death, abolished on the cross), “civil”, “judicial”, etc.

Do Mr. Ratzlaff and his admirers admit these three historic “non-negotiables” in the understanding of the Bible among Evangelical-Protestants, brought into the SDA Church by its pioneers? Or is he, rather, pioneering other views that won’t match the typical doctrines of the Protestant Christendom (even Roman Catholicism) on these points?



Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


Moderator:  A_G_Brito, A_G_Brito 
Who's Online
65 Registered (aldona, Asterix, Beryl, Bravus, c freeland, carolaa, CoAspen, cubensis, Curly, dgrimm60, Fausto, fccool, fun2believe, Gerry Cabalo, Gladussee, Jerry D Thomas, John Blake, John317, Kevin H, Kountzer, LifeHiscost, Lineman, Liz, LynnDel, magilly46, max, melvin mccarty, mikeyswen79, missionlady, Morning Glory, Neil D, Nightingale, olger, pkrause, Planey, puddles, Redwood, Reinhard Lee, Robert, Ron Ammundsen, Tallmark, Taylor, truthseeker007, Vera, vern, 20 invisible), 476 Guests and 165 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Vegefood store

Be sure to click on the free shipping at the checkout else you get charged.

- - - - - -

Shout Box

The Chat Room

Come Chat with others,
open 24/7


- - - - - -
The following are google ads, these help to pay for the google ads we buy. Some are great, some are just strange. Report any nasty ones to Stan.
Newest Members
farmerdell8, 1christ1lord, kdavis1, Ignore this spammer, JohnH, RU4Christ, jd serhan, blessed1, Francis Kamuyu, zxatl, john sandifer, lilmogirl2267, princess sherly, ruthxa, BroRollo, nasiaki, JazzieBenzimsq, Mark Anthony, thegermanSDA, simonjonez, Fitz31, mensk, Michaelangelo, Brother Job, peacekeeper, Robert Alves, EastCoastRemnant, zen, Google, Pat Humphrey
2933 Registered Users
Adventist Ministries















l

Top Posters
Amelia 18207
Shane 16359
Robert 14958
Gail 13428
Neil D 12664
John317 9103
Redwood 7797
Gerry Cabalo 7320
Naomi 7196
Gregory Matthews 7084
Bravus 6657
Nan 5908
Shirley 5292
ChildofChrist 5046
Forum Stats
2933 Members
126 Forums
16992 Topics
162472 Posts

Max Online: 1237 @ 04/20/07 08:43 PM
30 days FREE

To become a full member, and view more forums. Please contact Stan, if you live in a developing Country or have other financial hardships, for a scholarship.
This income helps pay for hosting, advertising, domain names, software support etc etc
IF YOUR COUNTRY IS NOT LISTED OR IF YOU LIVE IN THE UNITED STATES

- - - - - - - - - - -

IF YOU LIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

- - - - - - - - - - -

IF YOU LIVE IN AUSTRALIA

- - - - - - - - - - -

IF YOU LIVE IN GREAT BRITAIN

- - - - - - - - - - -

IF YOU LIVE IN EUROPE

- - - - - - - - - - -

LIVE IN MEXICO

* * * NEW * * * NEW * * * NEW * * *

THE ADVENTIST FORUM® is a self-supporting ministry and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland or any of its subsidiaries.
Copyright © ClubAdventist.com® 1999 - 2008