Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#166977 - 04/17/08 06:41 PM Re: Creation Reconsidered: Scientific, Biblical, and Theo... [Re: David Koot]
Vera Online   content


Registered: 05/19/07
Posts: 112
Originally Posted By: David Koot
Originally Posted By: Vera
If you have to read Genesis 1 and 2 literally, you have to read the entire Bible literally.

Correct, unless a passage states that it is a 'parable,' for example, or some other intended application. Do you see a problem with reading the entire Bible in such a light?

The short answer to your question is yes.

The longer answer is not only too long for this format but is still being formed, and I may very well blog it shortly.

In a roundabout way, however, I can tell you the reason for the short answer.

Do Bible writers consistently and explicitly signal the type of writing they're about to do? If not, should Bible readers, using a variety of methods, use their best judgment to make that determination? Are Bible readers who hold to sola scriptura already doing that in spite of their best efforts?

Originally Posted By: Shane
There is nothing in Genesis that indicates it is not to be read literally. In fact, the evidence is quite the contrary. The evidence indicates that the prophets, apostles and Christ read Genesis literally.


Here, permit me to share a quote from Paradigms on Pilgrimage: Creationism, Paleontology and Biblical Interpretation:

Quote:
In preparing for a debate with a young-earth creationist, he [Stephen J. Godfrey, paleontologist and co-author of the book] decided—after several years of avoiding the Genesis creation account because of painful experiences associated with it—to reacquaint himself with it by reading it through many times. In so doing, he made a startling discovery. He realized to that point he had not been able to make sense of what was written because he had automatically but subconsciously been interpreting the text based on a 21st-century cosmological understanding. His reading was suffering from the proverbial "paradigm effect."

Therefore, in rereading the creation account, he made a conscious effort to forget what he knew about the structure of our solar system and the universe beyond.... The result of this experience was a radical new approach for what this account actually says.

pages 177-178

Which might be an interesting place to start if you're looking for a different understanding of Genesis.

It also underlines the fact that sola scriptura notwithstanding, we all bring our worldviews to our reading of the Bible.
_________________________
So love is greater than knowledge; how could I have forgotten? Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm | Wishing Doesn't Make It So

Top
#167000 - 04/17/08 09:38 PM Re: Creation Reconsidered: Scientific, Biblical, and Theo... [Re: Shane]
melvin mccarty Online   content


Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 584
Loc: B,C.
Problem is that chapter one and chapter two do not agree in a literal reading. We have to start explaining right away to make the first and second chapters agree.

mel

Top
#167073 - 04/18/08 01:20 AM Re: Creation Reconsidered: Scientific, Biblical, and Theo... [Re: melvin mccarty]
Shane Offline
Administrator of Foro Adventista

Registered: 02/02/02
Posts: 16408
Loc: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
The Bible only contradicts itself when one assumes each and every word was inspired by God. The message is inspired but the words which were chosen to express the message were chosen by erring and sinful men.

The only words written by God Himself were the Ten Commandments and MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN. We find God's creation account in the Fourth Commandment which clears up any misunderstanding some may have about the creation week recorded in Genesis.
_________________________
I reserve the humble right to be wrong.

Link > Shane's Page - update in progress

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2


Moderator:  Bravus 
Shout Box

Who's Online
56 registered (Bravus, carolaa, CoAspen, Coulsty, darlene, Denise, dgrimm60, fccool, fun2believe, Gladussee, Gregory Matthews, Jerry D Thomas, John317, keysgalore, Kountzer, lazarus, LifeHiscost, Lineman, Liz, LynnDel, melvin mccarty, mikeyswen79, Morning Glory, Nan, Neil D, Nightingale, olger, pkrause, Redwood, Riley, Robert, SMAN, stevie84, Suzanne Sutton, Taylor, Toni, truthseeker007, Vera, 18 invisible), 388 Guests and 228 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Featured Member
Registered: 05/15/08
Posts: 361
Top Posters (30 Days)
John317 1117
Redwood 823
Neil D 499
Shane 445
Robert 408
Bravus 363
carolaa 355
BobRyan 340
Amelia 280
rush4hire 191
Gail 150
B Humble 138
jasd 132
Stan Jensen 127
Top Posters
Amelia 18243
Shane 16408
Robert 15020
Gail 13443
Neil D 12745
John317 9248
Redwood 7957
Gerry Cabalo 7322
Naomi 7196
Gregory Matthews 7093
Bravus 6707
Nan 5916
Shirley 5292
ChildofChrist 5046
Vegefood store

Be sure to click on the free shipping at the checkout else you get charged.

- - - - - -

Newest Members
sandyl1980, stevie84, ImStillLearning, sunrize, jowalt41
2938 Registered Users
Member Photos
Gas Tanks At Twilight, CA
Man In the Train Yards, Colton, CA
Burnt Tree & Moon, San Timoteo Canyon, CA