#190215 - 10/02/08 05:56 PM
Re: Some questions to think about
[Re: Vera]
|
Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 683
|
I assume that we can agree that scientific fraud is serious when it occurs, but that it doesn't make up a significant portion of scientific effort or thought. Real science doesn't need decades long fraud to gain acceptance. in Christ, Bob
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#190218 - 10/02/08 06:31 PM
Re: Some questions to think about
[Re: BobRyan]
|
Registered: 05/19/07
Posts: 139
|
Fraud is not how the theory of evolution was established.
_________________________
So love is greater than knowledge; how could I have forgotten? Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm | Wishing Doesn't Make It So
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#190221 - 10/02/08 08:09 PM
Re: Some questions to think about
[Re: BobRyan]
|
Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 690
Loc: B,C.
|
Bob what is your theory about the origin of the so-called food chain. When did the almost infinite number of methods of self defence originate (like protective coloring)? How did the rattlesnake come by it's venom and it's rattles? When and how did the lions become become killers and develop jaws and teeth for the purpose? mel
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#190263 - 10/03/08 01:53 AM
Re: Some questions to think about
[Re: melvin mccarty]
|
Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 683
|
As it turns out -- not only does the timline of Gen 1-2:3 and Ex 20:8-11 not agree with Richard Dawkin's view of origins - but the Gen 1:29-30 food chain does not agree either! Gen 1 29 Then God said, ""Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; 30 and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food''; and it was so. 31 God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day
Wow - imagine Dawkins being wrong on both counts!  Ok - I know that was not your question. So WHEN did they change? Certainly we had the division of clean and unclean animals by the 1600 year boundary where we see the flood in Gen 6. We also know that the division of clean unclean and animal-eating was in place right after the flood. How long BEFORE that time - is anybody's guess. I personnally think that all evidence of catastrophic and rapid burial associated with Dinosaurs puts their death at the time of the flood. I doubt they had much flooding before them -- even locally unless someone was playing around with water irrigation and that does not seem likely given their climate. in Christ, Bob
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
$10 or $10,000 your choice :)
|
|

SEARCH OUR SITE
|
|
This full membership income helps pay for hosting, advertising, domain names, software support etc etc
|
|
|
63 registered (Adventist Film, aldona, A_G_Brito, Belabud, Beryl, Bravus, BSW, bygjymbo, CoAspen, darlene, David-Kingsley, Denise, dgrimm60, Doug, eddie, fccool, Freebird, Gerry Cabalo, Gladussee, guibox, jay65409, John317, Kevin H, Kountzer, lazarus, Linda M, Liz, Luke Adam Goss, melvin mccarty, Michaeneu, Morning Glory, Nan, Neil D, olger, pkrause, Redwood, Robert, rose_bowen, skyblue888, SMAN, Sulla, Suzanne Sutton, Trench, Vera, 19 invisible),
455
Guests and
67
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Registered: 03/24/00
Posts: 1141
|
|
|