Jump to content
ClubAdventist is back!

A Climate Change Story


Bravus

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators

On another forum someone posted a link to this 2004 story from the UK's 'telegraph' newspaper to call the human causation of climate change into question:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml

I did a very little bit of digging and found the original press release from the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research on which the newspaper article was (ostensibly) based:

http://www.mps.mpg.de/en/aktuelles/pressenotizen/pressenotiz_20040802.html

Here's part of the conclusion:

Quote:
"Just how large this role is, must still be investigated, since, according to our latest knowledge on the variations of the solar magnetic field, the significant increase in the Earth's temperature since 1980 is indeed to be ascribed to the greenhouse effect caused by carbon dioxide," says Prof. Sami K. Solanki, solar physicist and director at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research.

Can't always trust what you read in the paper, eh?

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Not BBC, Channel 4, which is a commercial channel in the UK. Here's the reaction of one of the climate scientists who was interviewed for that program:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/03/swindled-carl-wunsch-responds/

And a rebuttal to the points raised (which is *really* from the BBC):

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/03/a-much-more-eloquent-rebuttal-of-tggws/

(some coarse language)

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

D'oh, I wanted to delete the second link above, just because it does contain some swearing and also because the relevant piece is 18 minutes into the program, but the time to edit has passed. The point made is that the makers of the 'Global Warming Swindle' 'documentary' twisted sources and edited video to make people appear to be saying things they hadn't said.

You'd think if there was a strong scientific case against climate change it might not be necessary to stoop to those kinds of tactics.

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...