Jump to content
ClubAdventist is back!

I'm For Change, Not Him


Recommended Posts

Obama:McCain-Palin 'lying'

"When John McCain gets up there with Sarah Palin and says 'we're for change'... you've got to ask yourselves, what are they talking about, how do they have the nerve to say it?" the Democrat added.

"It's empty words. You're just saying it because you realize, gosh, Obama's been talking about change and it seems to be working, so maybe we should say it too," he added to mocking laughter from a crowd of 1,500...

An ad by the Obama campaign featured a photo of Palin wearing a T-shirt extolling the scrapped bridge, which would have connected a handful of Alaskans to an airport at vast expense, and highlighted McCain's lock-step voting record with President George W. Bush.

"Politicians lying about their records? You don't call that maverick -- you call it more of the same," the announcer said, breaching one of the last taboos of US politics by accusing the Republicans of outright dishonesty.

[text taken from link]

Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com

Author of  Peculiar Christianity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Demos ... When pointing fingers ... you have the most pointing back atya.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Bwahaha - and are Republicans' hands shaped differently? Or did all Palin's false allegations about Obama in her speech rebound on her too? Can't have it both ways.

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I listened to the entire speech. And the only things I heard were truth.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously. ONLY the President resides in the White House.

Well ... if the president is married ... then the spouse can reside there also.

But the last I knew ... Palin is not married to McCain.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Given that she is the one who has a child with a disability, and given that it was her speech, it's pretty clear that it's herself she's talking about. She may have mis-spoken about the 'White House' as just meaning the Presidential arm of government, but to claim that this sentence is talking about McCain is to completely ignore the sense and context of the quote. As I said, 'be serious': I really don't have the time and energy to debate if the clear sense and intention of the words is going to be twisted because the person who said them was imprecise.

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we all need to lighten up just a bit.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Oh absolutely - my apologies - text doesn't get across the light, teasing and extremely *un*angry tone that's in my mind when I write these things! No attack or offence intended at all.

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

More Republican business as usual - Palin Billed State for Nights Spent at Home

"Absurdity reigns and confusion makes it look good."

"Sinless perfection is such a shallow goal."

"I love God only as much as the person I love the least."

*Forgiveness is always good news. And that is the gospel truth.

(And finally, the ideas expressed above are solely my person views and not that of any organization with which I am associated.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what the issue is. What ever she actually claimed .... it was according to policies established by the state at least this is what the state finance director indicated. It has been completely reviewed. It is all legal. Is there any evidence other wise?

She already has refused much of her salary to save the taxpayers money. I don't see any issues here.

This sounds like Demos trying to grasp at anything. Sad.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Palin actually slashed funding for schools for special needs kids by 62%. Budgets: FY 2007 (pre-Palin), 2008, 2009

CBS needs to do a little more research. Palin actually tripled funding to schools for special needs. A lot of swiftboat attacks flying at her, just as I predicted.

Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com

Author of  Peculiar Christianity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Palin actually slashed funding for schools for special needs kids by 62%. Budgets: FY 2007 (pre-Palin), 2008, 2009

CBS needs to do a little more research. Palin actually tripled funding to schools for special needs. A lot of swiftboat attacks flying at her, just as I predicted.

Ok, we got the idea that CBS needs to do more research....but where is YOUR facts that show other wise? Or are we to take your word as 'gospel'?

Cuz, truth be told...your record is heavily influenced as well...And we all have seen that...

Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.

 

George Bernard Shaw

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Shane is influenced by the truth.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

It could be that both facts are partially true, since apples aren't being compared with apples.

Read this FactCheck.org article (reprinted in Newsweek) carefully: http://www.newsweek.com/id/157986

What it says is that Palin tripled funding for a specific class of special needs students needing intensive support. This is the source of the claim for tripled funding, but it is not for all special needs students. It is even possible that funding for all special needs students was cut while this particular group's funding was tripled.

It's important to read carefully and think critically.

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

...and here's the source for the 62% cut claim:

Quote:
During 2006, children served by special education facilities and programs, including the Special Education Service Agency (SESA) and the Alaska School for the Deaf , received more state support; but as of 2008 and 2009, the proposed budget was cut from $7,949.30 down to $3,156.00.

From here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adrienne-williams/palin-gutted-special-ed-f_b_123774.html

So it was not special needs funding as a whole that was cut, but funding to special schools. This may well have been due to more special needs students moving into mainstream schools, or to other factors.

And even then, the claim is misleading, since the governor actually wanted to increase funding (budget link at the top of that story).

I don't think Palin is good for America, but I'm not going to lie about her record in making that case - there's plenty of true stuff that's worrying.

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...