Oh boy! Just when you thought it couldn't get worse!

[Gregory Matthews]

In the opening paragraph, Photodude  quotes the following:  "The recurring theme of “Ghost Girl” from start to finish is an explicit, oral sex act or sex scene. . . "

I would not argue with a person who said that the description of a "start to finish" sex act  from the beginning to organism was pornographic.

But I do not find Susan writing such.   In addition I do not find this mention of fellatio to be either a recurring theme or an extended discussion of the actual act.  I consider the actual reference to be  two (2) brief one sentence references that use other words than I have used   Now if one were to argue that the actual  references were 2 or 3 sentences each I would not  consider that to be worth objecting to.  My point is that the accrual reference is both brief and does not describe from the beginning to organism.

The point of the story is that the male driver of the car falsely accused his female friend of causing the accident by sexually assaulting him while he was driving, when in fact the accident was caused by his texting while he was driving.

I do agree that the story that Susan wrote, in one section was both poorly written and confusing as to what she actually wrote.   Susan has essentially acknowledged such and expressed regret for what she wrote.  Let us accept that, move on and in respect to honesty not accuse her beyond the actual facts as to what she actually  wrote.