Jump to content
ClubAdventist is back!

The wide subject


Neil D

Recommended Posts

It has come to my attention that some threads are too narrow...and must be limited to just the topic at hand....

This thread will be about anything and everything, as long as there is humor in it....and be warned...humor can be rejected...if it is, that part of this subject must be dropped and some other aspect to the thread must be brought out....

To get us started somewheres, I would like to propose that the thinking of women and men, while different, poses a whole host of humorous commments....

besides, has anyone seen the wired circuitry of women balled up and touching all other subjects and yet remain as clear and thoughtful ...whereas men, whose thinking is neat and clean in boxes, have never seen my son's room [or any other male room] in the primest of cluttered condition....is that not reflective of men's thinking?

Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.

 

George Bernard Shaw

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • David Koot

    27

  • Bravus

    15

  • Amelia

    12

  • D. Allan

    11

Quote:
primest of cluttered condition

Hmmm. Sounds like someone I know

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
primest of cluttered condition

Hmmm. Sounds like someone I know

I hate it when people insist on being obtuse in a humor thread when specifics are far more fun than nebulous guessing on whom it could be....

You, obviously, are NOT refering to ME! so I must conclude that it is either David or Bravus...Since David admitted to a recent LIBERAL intent and that of voting for a progressive liberal canidate, you MUST be refering to him.....

Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.

 

George Bernard Shaw

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want an example of clutter. Look at the avatar under the poster Neil D.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whereas men, whose thinking is neat and clean in boxes, have never seen my son's room [or any other male room] in the primest of cluttered condition....is that not reflective of men's thinking?

Doesn't it sound similar to CVA? When the left brain is affected the result will be right-sided weakness, OPPOSITE result. Well, I hope is not the same with any other things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will simply comment on something that a former girlfriend said to me. She said, "Isn't it ironic that women are so tidy and organized when it comes to housework and the home, but they are emotional wrecks." Now, Neil and company, that was NOT my statement. A woman made that statement. So I don't need to hide behind Neil's boulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you suggesting that Neil has had a CVA or his son?

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone seen the Mad Hatter recently?

Um...do we have a "Mad Hatter" here?????

Okay, okay, Neil, here you are characterizing me as a FELLOW conservative (we all know your secret conservative leanings and that the 'Calvin' persona is all show) when in reality I may not even be subject to categorization. But as for McCain, I am running scared. There is something unsettling. I feel like he is the one person, looking back over the last fifty years, who might press the button to start a nuclear holocaust. AND that he is a very likely candidate to implement a national Sunday law. Picture Douglas MacArthur in the White House. There you have my take on the man.

Hope you don't mind, David, but I brought this here, as a way to keep the other thread from being hijacked...mea culpa, folks...

And while you THINK that I might be willing to vote that way, I was pondering the idea the other day. "What would cause me to vote McCain for President"?...I was thinking that I would vote for McCain back in 2000 when he was running, but I think that we have a much more intelligent and appealing persons in either of the democrates, Obama and Clinton...So, yeah, of the republican canidates, I might stomach him....but the things that he nauseates me on is the fact that he has courted the ultra conservative religionists during th last 8 years that I am not sure that he is a good canidate...Rather, I tend to think that he is like Hillary, desires the office, and is willing to do anything to get it. and I don't hold to dirty politics....

Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.

 

George Bernard Shaw

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Redwood, we're talkin' about the NEIL here. Anything is possible, remember.

Hey...Tourretts syndrome, I will admit to...CVA, not yet....

Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.

 

George Bernard Shaw

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(we all know your secret conservative leanings and that the 'Calvin' persona is all show)

Notice that not only did Neil NOT dispute this statement when originally made, but he actually QUOTED it in his own post. Clearly, Neil acknowledges that he DOES have conservative leanings and that Calvin is all show. At last, the truth comes out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did take the time to watch the clip. It is indeed hilarious. I am puzzled how ordinary people who have any level of education OR common sense could fall for such a story. It is indeed rather preposterous. This is not the first time I have been exposed to the teachings, but it is a reminder.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps one need only like in the mirror to answer that 'deep and wide' question. Let me know what you think after doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

The physical mirror confirms the width OK, but only the mental mirror can measure depth. bwink

Truth is important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alice faces a looking glass (mirror) and is standing at a level so that her eyes appear to her to be right at the top of the mirror . At the position she is standing, she can just see her belt buckle at the bottom of the mirror. If she steps back far enough

α. she will be eventually able to see all of herself in the mirror at the same time.

β. she will see no change in how much of herself she can see.

γ. she will see less of herself as she steps back.

δ. some other result (explain)

dAb

O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
I'll go for alpha but can't be bothered making the character

_________________________

The Disclaimer | http://www.bravus.com/blog

That you can spell it is better than pasting!

The question came from http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/abp/TPProbs/Problems/OP/OP19.htm and I don't see the answer there except for this note:

"Note to the instructor: This is another surprise for many students. A large majority think you can see more of yourself by stepping back. What experiences do you suppose led them to that conclusion?"

I choose delta, other: she will back into the wall and crack her head!!!

Must we run an experiment? :)

dAb

O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be positive because I didn't back up to infinity and my mirror could be faulty or I may need new glasses but I vote for (B). Dont tell Alice.

mel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alice doesn't live here anymore. See her at the restaurant.

<p><span style="color:#0000FF;"><span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-style:italic;">"Do not use harmful words, but only helpful words, the kind that build up and provide what is needed, so that what you say will do good to those who hear you."</span></span> Eph 4:29</span><br><br><img src="http://banners.wunderground.com/weathersticker/gizmotimetemp_both/US/OR/Fairview.gif" alt="Fairview.gif"> Fairview Or</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bravus, the scientist and professor, chose . . . 'alpha'?

Consider this: IF the mirror is a flat surface, then the image will reflect back to exactly the same point. There is no perspective to consider. Hence it would not matter if a person were two feet away from it, or twenty feet. The only variance would result from irregularities in the reflective surface. Optical-grade glass is typically ground to at least 1/8-wave of sodium light, but then again, a typical household mirror doesn't come anywhere close to that. Still, the variance should be negligible.

Therefore, 'beta' is the correct answer.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...