teresaq Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 if one language is instantly changed into a few different ones then why would people not unite with those who spoke the same language they did and go off in different directions? your statement would imply the different languages "evolved" from one common one over time instead of being instantly changed, at least the way i understood it. Quote facebook. /teresa.quintero.790 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardw Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Let's say people united under their individual languages and separated. If the tower of Babel was somewhere in Iraq then how did language hubs get to Austrailia, South America, and even Africa. These distances would be highly unlikely. If this happened language wouldn't prevent people from trading and eventually learning each other's language and establishing adjacent cities and towns. If you look at migration maps based on DNA you will see that migration went north from Africa. In the Bible it states that migration came to Babylon from the East. This is most likely a myth. Quote Rich http://tiny.cc/CM2j8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teresaq Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 ok, if thats how you see it. :) Quote facebook. /teresa.quintero.790 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardw Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 I think this is an important distinction. It's not how I see it, but where the evidence points. Those are two different things. Quote Rich http://tiny.cc/CM2j8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.