Seventh-day Adventists and the United Nations: Why Engagement Does Not Compromise Doctrine

[phkrause]

When A.T. Jones stood before the U.S. Congress in the 1880s to argue against Sunday laws, he wasn’t trying to win political favor — he was standing up for religious freedom. He spoke not on behalf of a party or platform, but as a Seventh-day Adventist defending conscience. Fast forward to today, and the church is still showing up in the public square — not only in Washington and other cities around the world, but at the United Nations. That presence has stirred some concern among Adventists who wonder whether global engagement is a step too far.

https://religiouslibertytv.substack.com/p/seventh-day-adventists-and-the-united?

[Joe Knapp]

AT Jones did not take money from them.  If church leaders were doing what AT Jones did, we would not care. 

Quote

This status does not involve political alliance or theological compromise

 

The minute you take money, things change.  To say otherwise is naive at best. I am happy church members are finally speaking out. 

In addition, the agenda of the UN is clear. A one world government. We, out of all the people in the world, should understand the danger in that.