Leaderboard

would that "removal" mean "removal from church membership," "removal from office," or "removal to an Adventist 're-education' camp"?

The following URL works where the one listed in the post above does not. https://www.adventistworld.org/regard-for-and-practice-of-general-conference-session-and-general-conference-executive-committee-actions/ NOTE: You heard about this first from this forum. The OP in this thread was posted about 20 minutes after notice was posted in the Review website. As I write this, neither Adventist Today nor Spectrum has posted about this. This forum has delivered an important news item to you before any other independent source posted it.

Yup. Not a "salvation issue".

There are many things in Scripture that are hard to understand, and/or have not been clearly stated in fullness.: * Perhaps God wants us to spend some time and effort in study of some issues? * Perhaps, some issues are not as important as we make them to be. * Perhaps it is O.K. for Christians to differ on some points. * Perhaps [You fill in the space.} :)

My "problem" with the doctrine of the Trinity, is that there IS NO clear definition of the term. How can one espouse a doctrine, which is not clearly defined? SDA pioneers and Catholic theologians each individually understood the term differently. It's like wrestling with smoke. You can't get a good grasp of anything. The immediate excuse is that it's just too far beyond our ability to understand. How can we believe in something that is beyond our ability to understand - even at the most basic level? No wonder the agnostics think they have a good excuse. Why even spend time discussing whether "God" is a Trinity - if you cannot define "Trinity" ? You would think, if "God" really IS "a Trinity", that He would have left some strong statements to that effect.