Leaderboard

Pastor Matthews: The reason that I said that is what she stated Nov 18: "Has he lied about his personal relationships? Maybe. Can't say clearly. Is that enough to make me vote Democrat? No." I would think we all use the quotes that the person we are responding back to, so that everyone could read and see why we are saying what we are stating. Evidently this was not done. They all would know why I said; "There is no maybe if you lied!" Again, I was accused falsely because it was overlooked. I did not mention him as a businessman, Rachel did! "A billionaire businessman slept with more than one woman, was married three times, is blunt and direct, brags a lot, doesn't always "turn the other cheek", etc. etc. Agreed. I see that. Are those things enough to made me vote Democrat? No!" I stated; "You can excuse him of what he has done all you want. Businessman, police, doctor. lawyer etc., what he did and still is doing is wrong." If you notice I was not condoning any profession he may acquire, that was not my concern it was his actions against THE MOST HIGH! Yes, I did say to her and to other that they act like they adore him. I said that base on them admitting the things he continue to do. Even to the point of declaring that he said he was not a righteous man. Yet, it has been said that YAHWEH sent him! My point is I stand on what I said and not what I didn't say or meant. If I would have said anything wrong call a person here a liar, you know I would be the first to apologize. No, my name was not mention, however surprisingly a lot of what I said was known and taking out of context! I will say again, I am a person of deep principles. I tried to the utmost to practice what I present here on this forum. Have I made mistakes, yes I have and confess to them, along with an apology. I am never better then anyone here but neither am I less! We all make mistakes! When we do, we should simply admit to it and apologize. I am surprise, that when I came to identify that it was me and to state what was said was not correct. I felt, you are trying to make me feel wrong for something I have not done. I will say, you have come to me on many occasions in the past and asked me for clarification. This time you didn't and it makes me very sad!? Please, Make It Right!

Re: Knowing them by their fruits I agree that it is not my province to judge the sincerity of another. I tend to presume sincerity and good faith on the part of my brother and sisters, but I do not know. I wonder what Jesus meant by "fruits". Was He talking about the "fruit of the spirit" to which Paul referred in Galatians 5:22-23? Or was He referring to something else? I've known people who I believe demonstrate true love towards their neighbours who explicitly reject Christianity and I've know professed Christians, including Adventists who I believe are simply nasty people. I personally don't see any correlation between belief and one's love and care for one's neighbours.

I am actually interested to hear those details. If I was a little hyper in my response, pls forgive. Some days are better than other days right now. No rush. Just whenever you have time.

Pastor Matthew: I work at home and sometime I can go online. I miss this. What I stated was this: "Business man, police, doctor. lawyer etc., what he did and still is doing is wrong. Is he racist and you don't believe so is truly sad. Walk a mile in a black person shoe! I will not even go further with this! There is no maybe if you lied! " I was not speaking about Rachel, I was referring to the person in the WH and comment on what she said. There is no maybe if you lied was what I have been saying in all my comments about him and not Rachel. I have never called anyone on this forum a liar and I really felt that you could have asked me first before saying that I did! You could have talked to me privately and I would have assure you that it not her at all! Now, what is so sad I am put down by others for something I did not do. I truly feel you owe me an apology. I stand on principles and I am not changing what I said that he lies, etc., but I would not say about Rachel or anyone here. Please!

Kevin: Where on earth did you get this from? You see this is totally racist to the highest degree. I am offended! Melchizedek was a Canaanite he comes from the Jebusite. One of the sons of Canaan. And Melchizedek King of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of THE MOST HIGH EL. Gen 14:18 Shâlêm (H8004): The same as H8003; peaceful; Shalem, an early name of Jerusalem: - Salem. Strong Hebrew Dictionary This Text above stands to debunk the trinity. It shows that Melchizedek not only served and worshipped THE FATHER but it identifies only THE FATHER. Using the singular noun of THE ALMIGHTIES SUBTITLE which stands for ONE INDIVIDUAL SPIRITUAL BEING, THE FATHER who IS THE MOST HIGH! This also let you know the intellect and relationship that THE FATHER had with this King and High Priest! Melchizedek was King and Priest of the tribe which held Jerusalem. F. B. Meyer, B.A. The Hebrew Bible describes the Jebusites as dwelling in the mountains besides Jerusalem. In Exodus, the 'good and large land, flowing with milk and honey' which was promised to Moses as the future home of the oppressed Hebrew people included the land of the Jebusites. According to the Book of Joshua, Adonizedek led a confederation of Jebusites, and the tribes from the neighboring cities of Jarmuth, Lachish, Eglon and Hebron against Joshua, but was soundly defeated and killed. However, Joshua 15:63 states that Judah could not dislodge the Jebusites, who were living in Jerusalem ("to this day the Jebusites live there with the people of Judah"). Judges 1:21 portrays the Jebusites as continuing to dwell at Jerusalem, within the territory otherwise occupied by the Tribe of Benjamin. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The problem is the truth is not told and overlooked that "YAHWEH is no respect of persons." As much as it has been to cover up and to allow chattel slavery of the Black people, justice and truth will come forth. YAHWEH WORD will NOT BE MADE VOID! Abraham was looking among the many deities that the Chaldeans of Southern Turkey was serving which one is THE MOST HIGH and also the true and correct one to serve. This was the Ur specifically stated in the Bible the of Ur of the Chaldees and not the Ur of the Sumerians who were one of the Black people who left Babel or Babylon but returned and formed cities states. Abraham did not leave one of the city states called Ur near Babylon that is ridiculous. He travelled down from most likely Urfa. Haran is so close to Urfa and was an easy travel toward Canaan. Here Abraham would come in contact with the Canaanites who were still serving THE MOST HIGH. Which is the false belief that YAHWEH called only Shem's descendants instead of the whole world. Abraham was from the city of Ur according to Genesis 11:31 above. The problem is that there are several places called Ur. It is mostly translated as "Ur of the Chaldeans." The problem with "Chaldeans" is that it is a late word used in the Neo-Babylonian times. It is either anachronistic, or a poor translation. There is no debate over where Haran is located, 10 miles north of the Syrian border in Turkey along the Balikh River, a tributary of the Euphrates River. Haran is an important Hurrian center, mentioned in the Nuzi tablets. The moon god, Sin was worshiped here. There are two cities not far from Haran; Ura and Urfa. Local tradition says that Abraham was born in Urfa. Northern Ur is mentioned in tablets at Ugarit, Nuzi, and Ebla, which refers to Ur, URA, and Urau (See BAR January 2000, p. 16). The names of several of Abraham's relatives like Peleg, Serug, Nahor and Terah, appear as names of cities in the region of Haran (Harper's Bible Dictionary, page 373). Abraham sent his servant back to the region of Haran to find a wife for Isaac (Genesis 24:10). http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/ur.html#journey When arriving on the scene he encountered the Amorites who came from his fourth son. This powerful tribe, were the ones that eventually took over Babylon and their well known king Hammurabi (r. 1792-1750 BCE) laws, are known to be similar to Moses. Here Abraham lived among them and learned about worshiping YAHWEH. Sodom and Gomorrah were going astray and Lot, Abraham's nephew chose to move closer to the twin cities. Soon he moved into the city and married a woman of Sodom, who bore his children. YAHWEH gave Sodom a warning of their disobedience to HIM and lusting after the flesh. Jude 1:7 Several kings of more than one nations and ethnicity combine together to take Sodom; including Lot. The Amorites joined with Abraham to bring the booty and the people ,which included Lot back. Abraham knew Melchizedek and who he serve. He knew that he was the Priest of THE MOST HIGH and came to present to him tithe. Now notice Abraham did not labor for this tithe! So, why did he give it? He had taken the booty back that belong to Sodom. He first returned a tithe to THE MOST HIGH for Sodom and Gomorrah who had stopped remembering their duty and obedience to HIM on HIGH! The king of Sodom was there with the King and Priest of Jerusalem. After returning tithes from the booty, Abraham gave all of the rest of the boot back to the king of Sodom. The king of Sodom knew and did not complain about what Abraham did. Gen Chapter 14 Then, after what took place above, later Abraham had a vision to assure him that he would have a son and his descendants would multiply like the stars in the sky. But something had to take place first. Here is where the truth concerning the Black people the first chosen was hidden. Not even, White SDA preachers or the Black ones also, tried to recognize that these people were Blacks coming from Ham. Instead the so call Christians believe this: The view that Amorites were fierce, tall nomads led to an anachronistic theory among some racialist writers in the 19th century that they were a tribe of "Aryan" warriors who at one point dominated the Israelites. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia No, instead more lies to make only one ethnic group superior over everyone else.They had to be the Egyptians, the Ethiopians, the Philistines, the Phonecians, the Southern Indians from India (the Dravidians), the Chinese, the Asians people, the American Indians. Which is not so, all of these people come from Ham! The Bible also told Abraham that HE was giving the last group of Canaanites who had remain faithful to HIM four hundred years and thirty years within the four hundred years, Abraham children would take over the land. But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. Gen 15:16 The IsraEL were suppose to destroy all of the Canaanites, but they didn't and they married them. Judah's himself had a baby by his son's wife. Read the story and found out why. Gen Chapter 38 You will also learned that is was through Tamar twin son Pharez came the line of YAHSHUA also Rahab of Jericho and Ruth a Moabite. All of these women were people of color, they were Black! The continent of Africa was originally divided up by Ham's 4 sons: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Kemet/Egypt), Phut (Phoenicia/Libya), and Canaan (Israel). Everybody agrees that Ham was what we call African. So, Canaanites would have to be Africans. Salem was a Canaanite city, and Melchizedek was King AND High Priest of that African city. Melchizedek was a real historical man, who was not a Hebrew. He was a Canaanite....clearly. Now consider what the New Testament Book of Hebrews writer said about Abraham, "For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God." Heb 11:10 Look it up and check the context for yourself... Abraham looked for a city whose builder and maker was God, and it was a city of Canaanites...or Africans. There were Africans who believed in the same Almighty God that Abraham believed in. Before this time, God called Abraham away from his people. (Gen 12:1). God chose Abraham to establish HIS Covenant with, but he was surrounded by and covered by faithful Canaanites...who were Africans. The World’s Best Kept Secret I urge all to realize that it is YAHWEH that chooses who will serve HIM! The Bible said the first shall be last and the last shall be first. The Canaanites were chosen, the Chaldeans of the Hebrew people who are named after their grandfather Eber. Abraham was chosen, then in Isa 66:19, the Gentiles, who are Japheth children were chosen. People out of all three sons of Noah were chosen and had fail! The final group chosen will come from all nations, tongues and people of the entire world. They will reap the harvest of souls and finish the work. ALLELUYAH! Blessings!

5 Things You Didn't Know About Casablanca On November 26, 1942, Casablanca, starring Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman, opened with its world premiere at the Hollywood Theater in New York. Here are 5 things you probably didn't know about one of the greatest films in history... A Deal Was Struck to Get Ingrid Bergman Producer Hal Wallis reportedly wanted Ingrid Bergman, who was contracted to David O. Selznick, to play Ilsa Lund, even though he had the likes of Hedy Lamarr and Ann Sheridan available. In order to get Bergman, Wallis traded her for Olivia de Havilland (Lady in a Cage). It wasn’t a permanent trade, but it worked, enabling Wallis to cast the woman he wanted as the lead. Bogart Never Said "Play It Again, Sam" It’s one of the most famous lines in film history that is emblazoned in the memory of every Casablanca viewer. Even Woody Allen made a movie called Play It Again, Sam — highlighting its popularity. Problem is, Bogart’s Rick, who is often credited with saying “Play it again, Sam” in Casablanca, never did. He said “Play it” to Sam. Bergman’s Ilsa Lund did say something along the lines of “Play it again, Sam” early on in the film but still not the exact phrase.Rick did say “Here’s looking at you, kid” and “Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.” The latter, which is the final line in Casablanca, was added by Bogart after shooting ended — it was dubbed in. Bogart's Height Had to Be Adjusted Bogart, at 5’ 8” tall, was nearly two inches shorter than Bergman and that just wouldn’t work during filming. The studio got around the height difference by having Bogart stand on blocks or sit on top of cushions to appear taller than his love interest. It’s the apple box effect and all about perspective. And it’s still used today along with other techniques to give an actor an extra lift. The Fake Rumor That Ronald Reagan Would Star in the Movie Was Intentional An erroneous legend of Casablanca is that Humphrey Bogart almost wasn't cast in the career-defining role of Rick Blaine in favor of then small time actor and future President Ronald Reagan. This little tidbit has been scattered across trivia games, quiz shows and books throughout the years, but it's mostly based on a false rumor spread by the studio behind the film. Before the script for Casablanca was even completed, the publicity office at Warner Bros. dropped a fake press release to The Hollywood Reporter stating that "Ann Sheridan and Ronald Reagan will co-star in Casablanca," a detail that they knew to be false, but spilled anyway in order to keep the stars' names in the papers in advance of the release of another film they were really in, Kings Row. The truth was that director Hal Wallis never considered anyone but Bogart for the role, and the studio knew Reagan was about to be called into active duty for the U.S. Army. The Movie Wasn’t Expected to Be a Hit The script was unfinished during filming; Bogart was drinking and picking fights; Bergman was concerned about her next film, For Whom the Bell Tolls; and actor Paul Henreid, who played Victor Laszlo, called it a “lousy script.” However, instead of becoming an ordinary film that came and went, it became a classic and the one that people quoted lines from more than any other movie in history. It received eight nominations for an Academy Award and won for Best Director, Best Writing Adapted Screenplay, and Best Picture.

IMO, there was NO "hijacking" attempt. PK is one forum member who doesnt do that. In all the years I have been on the forum, I have never seen him do such things, not even once. BTW, a little thread drift is ok, but its not OK to make it personal, about a specific person. You should try looking over a persons posting history before jumping the gun. Not everyone that mentions Trump is "hijacking."

Did I say EVIL trump?????????? If I did let me have a link to that statement!!!!! Please, otherwise do not respond in this way!!! Fake is the statement that I said "Eveil trump!!!" That would be you And keep believing that there wont be a sunday law, because it will happen!!!!!