With All The Criticisms Of Trump This is Hilarious

August 21, 2016

Liberals Are Mad At Donald Trump For Handing Out Play-Doh In Louisiana

August 20, 2016 12:16pm

Donald Trump and his running mate Mike Pence recently visited Louisiana and handed out supplies to victims of the historic floods that soaked the state and left thousands of people displaced.

There’s one photo circulating the web, showing Donald Trump handing out Play-Doh. Liberals are LOSING it, because it’s SO DUMB to give Play-Doh to kids who literally just lost everything. Obviously.

Trump gave out toys and Play-Doh for 49 seconds. @HillaryClinton donated $1 million dollars to the flood victims of LA. Who helped more?

— Gary US Bonds (@GareBearEsq) August 20, 2016

Do they realize how completely ridiculous they sound? They’re actually criticizing Donald Trump for showing up in Louisiana with an 18-wheeler truck full of supplies, giving kids toys and speaking to flood victims.

They’re actually criticizing Trump for giving toys to children.

Meanwhile, President Obama won’t get off the golf course, and Hillary Clinton is incapable of waking up from her nap.

I guess Trump should’ve kicked back, relaxed and played a round of golf instead. Maybe then liberals would like him?

Honestly, they’d criticize him either way.

But now it’s bad to give toys to devastated children. In case you were wondering.

August 21, 2016

Is there evidence he gave anything *other* than toys?
Giving toys: good.
Giving only toys: shows questionable judgement.

I'm happy to wait for an answer and not make an assumption.

August 21, 2016

Diapers,formula,school supplies and other essentials. For all the times Trump plants both feet firmly in mouth this is about the dumbest issue to criticise him on. Especially when Obama is playing golf and warning others not to be racist and the hizzy fit he had over Bush and Katrina.

Those that have never lost absolutely everything they owned should really keep their mouths shut. The toy truck my son was given was as appreciated as the diapers we received.

August 22, 2016

What the people need is help in real and tangible and sustained ways. Not photo ops for politicians. It was not that he gave anything, it was that he just went there for his own campaign benefit more than any real intent to help where it counts. The president intentionally did not go to make an appearance at this point, since it would of necessity divert/delay substantial resources while he was there.

August 22, 2016

33 minutes ago, Tom Wetmore said:

What the people need is help in real and tangible and sustained ways. Not photo ops for politicians. It was not that he gave anything, it was that he just went there for his own campaign benefit more than any real intent to help where it counts. The president intentionally did not go to make an appearance at this point, since it would of necessity divert/delay substantial resources while he was there.

Oh please. Obama didn't have any problem condemning Bush for waiting two days to go for Katrina victims. Now all of a sudden it is the right thing to do? Whatever Trumps intention he did provide tangible help. You would be surprised how grateful you are to receive what is being scoffed at .When you don't have a diaper or a pair of shoes for your baby that semi full of what you scoff at is mighty welcome. A comb and brush are a godsend. Getting. a toy to occupy your little ones is like christmas. You can't even think of sustained help when you are just trying to get thru the next few hours. You might not have an appreciation for situations like that but our community was actually stunned at those that showed up with pickups and trailers loaded with what you are scoffing at

August 22, 2016

I really don't care why Trump did it and I don't think those on the receiving end share your concerns either. Personally I would like to see him go for another photo op and a semi loaded with items you don't think they need. I have never heard of private acts of generosity by either Clinton or Obama, yet long before there was a reason for a photo op Trump did .

August 22, 2016

8 hours ago, bonnie said:

I have never heard of private acts of generosity by either Clinton or Obama, yet long before there was a reason for a photo op Trump did .

I am not at all surprised that you would say that. Simple reason. Whenever Obama does anything good or positive, large or small, Fox News, (and all the other extremist right wing Internet site you seem to frequent as evidenced by your postings here..) is very likely to never even mention it. But if they do, they take great pains to minimize it, criticize it, or spin it into something terrible to the point the only way you would possible remember his actions on that particular occasion would be that he did something bad.

Then there is this. Obama is much more likely to keep his private acts of kindness and generosity as just that - private. Like when he often and routinely meets with families that are the victims of tragedy - he makes a significant effort to do so quietly with no media allowed. But I suspect Fox News respects that and never even mentions it at all.

And then there is the serious evidence of charitable giving reported on the Obamas tax return just released. Quite like a good tithe payer, 10 percent. And you can check the Clinton's tax returns for that too and compare it it with Trump's... Oh wait, I guess you can't since The Donald apparent prefers to hide that, or something else on his tax returns from public view!

And then there is the sad reality that those hostile to someone simply have a very hard time thinking of or remembering anything good about that person. Maybe you could try. Tell us just three positive things that you can think of that you know that Obama has done. And then tell us how long it took you to think of them. In fact I would ask the same of all the Obama haters here.

August 22, 2016

9 hours ago, bonnie said:

Oh please. Obama didn't have any problem condemning Bush for waiting two days to go for Katrina victims. Now all of a sudden it is the right thing to do? Whatever Trumps intention he did provide tangible help. You would be surprised how grateful you are to receive what is being scoffed at .When you don't have a diaper or a pair of shoes for your baby that semi full of what you scoff at is mighty welcome. A comb and brush are a godsend. Getting. a toy to occupy your little ones is like christmas. You can't even think of sustained help when you are just trying to get thru the next few hours. You might not have an appreciation for situations like that but our community was actually stunned at those that showed up with pickups and trailers loaded with what you are scoffing at

That is because the governmental response to Katrina, which was on Bush's watch and his responsibility, was a sustained and truly unquestionable disaster in itself. Remember FEMA and Bush's props to the incompetent guy he put in charge of it?

Thus far the Federal governmental response to this natural disaster, on Obama's watch, is going as it is supposed to. Obama showing up to hand out FEMA assistance would do nothing but create a photo op. And you know very well that no matter what he does publicly about it will be criticized and condemed far more than what you are on a rant in defense of Trump about. And that kind of meaninless and stupid distraction to getting the necessary job done is precisely what Obama is seeking to avoid by staying out of the lime light at this point. His experience and learning from the mistakes of Katrina, and not repeating them is kudos to his leadership. Trump is just demonstrating that he does not get that. He only knows self promotion. That is his business model. That is his campaign strategy. And that will be his presidency if he wins. It is all about Donald. Always has been. Always will be.

Do you really think Trump is a kind and generous person? Remember his generosity to Vets? How he had to be embarrassed into doing what he had bragged he would do in his attention grabbing fund raiser during the primaries?

August 22, 2016

1 hour ago, Tom Wetmore said:

And you know very well that no matter what he does publicly about it will be criticized and condemed far more than what you are on a rant in defense of Trump about.

I don't think that's true at all. That is purely an excuse. It doesn't matter what the political pundits think of Obama in the face of a tragedy. If Obama would go down there it would show his compassion as a representation of leadership for the American people.

If we compare the possible responses of Obama on if he goes to the south and shows his face down there but risks being accused of setting of a photo op. Or if he just doesn't go down at all. Me personally; I'd rather be accused of doing the photo op even though the true mission is compassion.

Tom, what you are saying is Obama cares more for the politics of this situation than the reality of doing the right thing. I'd say you would be correct.

2 hours ago, Tom Wetmore said:

His experience and learning from the mistakes of Katrina, and not repeating them is kudos to his leadership. Trump is just demonstrating that he does not get that. He only knows self promotion. That is his business model. That is his campaign strategy. And that will be his presidency if he wins. It is all about Donald.

I personally can't stand Trump but you know what? I don't care what his motivation was, he did a good thing even through the hypocritical criticism of the liberals.

August 22, 2016

That is because the governmental response to Katrina, which was on Bush's watch and his responsibility, was a sustsained and truly unquestionable disaster in itself. Remember FEMA and Bush's props to the incompetent guy he put in charge of it?

It was,but that wasn't the point. Many things that happened in Katrina rests with local and state government. The lack of ordering evacuation for so long and not providing transportation to help with evacuation. A lot full of school buses and the big worry was liability. I think it was a teenager that finally took a bus to remove those stranded

Obama should not have gone initially but I wonder if he remembers how he ripped Bush for not going immediately.

Thus far the Federal governmental response to this natural disaster, on Obama's watch, is going as it is supposed to. Obama showing up to hand out FEMA assistance would do nothing but create a photo op. And you know very well that no matter what he does publicly about it will be criticized and condemed far more than what you are on a rant in defense of Trump about.

Just as Bush was by Obama and the media. Maybe I just haven't seen it but don't see FEMA trucks lined up handing out immediate supplies.

And that kind of meaninless and stupid distraction to getting the necessary job done is precisely what Obama is seeking to avoid by staying out of the lime light at this point. His experience and learning from the mistakes of Katrina, and not repeating them is kudos to his leadership. Trump is just demonstrating that he does not get that. He only knows self promotion. That is his business model. That is his campaign strategy. And that will be his presidency if he wins. It is all about Donald. Always has been. Always will be.

Then Obama should have cut Bush the same slack for not going right away because he was on vacation.

I would bet the farm those receiving Trumps self promotion do not share you view.

Do you really think Trump is a kind and generous person? Remember his generosity to Vets? How he had to be embarrassed into doing what he had bragged he would do in his attention grabbing fund raiser during the primaries?

I have to rely on you and others that preach "Do Not Assume and Do not judge, to tell me what is in Trump's heart. Has he been generous with others in the past? Yes. Was he generous because he knew someday it would look good when he ran for the presidency? Don't know

Frankly I don't care. My point was making a news story about the thoughtlessness of giving children toys at this time. That simply shows ignorance and worse

Following the night of the massive tornado outbreak in MN,it was exactly that type of help that was most needed and appreciated. The Red Cross responded the next day, unfortunately it was in such a way it was several days before it could be utilized.We all received vouchers to go to Target and get two changes of clothes per family member,toiletries and yes those silly toys,one per child. Problem was we couldn't get there. Roads were blocked,our car had a tree thru the windshield. We needed help right then,not wait for FEMA to sort it all out.

Without any preparation the state and communities overnight did a far superior job compared to FEMA. Those that had the common sense to understand IMMEDIATE needs were a god send.

With all the criticism that can be leveled at Trump this is petty.

August 22, 2016

2 hours ago, Tom Wetmore said:

Tell us just three positive things that you can think of that you know that Obama has done. And then tell us how long it took you to think of them. In fact I would ask the same of all the Obama haters here.

Can't think of a single thing.

2 hours ago, Tom Wetmore said:

Like when he often and routinely meets with families that are the victims of tragedy

Except if there from a Baton Rouge? Or does he only meet with the victims of gun violence to politicize them in order to push for more gun control? Pot calling the kettle black here? Obama has no problem meeting victims of gun violence in order to push his anti gun measures but he won't go to Baton Rouge?

August 22, 2016

11 hours ago, bonnie said:

I have never heard of private acts of generosity by either Clinton or Obama, yet long before there was a reason for a photo op Trump did .

I am not at all surprised that you would say that. Simple reason. Whenever Obama does anything good or positive, large or small, Fox News, (and all the other extremist right wing Internet site you seem to frequent as evidenced by your postings here..) is very likely to never even mention it. But if they do, they take great pains to minimize it, criticize it, or spin it into something terrible to the point the only way you would possible remember his actions on that particular occasion would be that he did something bad.

A little like the LOVE you show towards Trump or Bush?

Then there is this. Obama is much more likely to keep his private acts of kindness and generosity as just that - private. Like when he often and routinely meets with families that are the victims of tragedy - he makes a significant effort to do so quietly with no media allowed. But I suspect Fox News respects that and never even mentions it at all.

I was not referring to what Obama as president has done. Regardless of who is president any "good deed" will be made public.

I was referring to those that have come forward regarding Trump's generosity at a time the public really would have said nice,who cares and moved on.

And then there is the serious evidence of charitable giving reported on the Obamas tax return just released. Quite like a good tithe payer, 10 percent. And you can check the Clinton's tax returns for that too and compare it it with Trump's... Oh wait, I guess you can't since The Donald apparent prefers to hide that, or something else on his tax returns from public view!

Again as president he knows that will be public knowledge. Is that why he upped his charitable giving? Don't know,I suspect you have that first hand knowledge

Yes, Trump should release his tax returns.

And then there is the sad reality that those hostile to someone simply have a very hard time thinking of or remembering anything good about that person. Maybe you could try. Tell us just three positive things that you can think of that you know that Obama has done. And then tell us how long it took you to think of them. In fact I would ask the same of all the Obama haters here.

You really have to do a little thinking on your Do Not Judge . Or can I assume that you hate Trump and Bush? I have little time for Trump's behavior,does that mean I hate him? I don't have any more respect for Obama as president,to you that is hate.

But back to the issue,the silliness and pettiness of making a news story out of playdough by people that have never been in that position

August 22, 2016

I'm not an Obama fan, but I don't hate him. I remember when he came out to Oso, Washington, when that horrific mudslide happened that wiped out so many homes and lives. He didn't bring any "help" with him, but just the fact that he showed up was very heartening to the people of the Pacific Northwest. I don't think his purpose for doing that was a photo op, but maybe it was. Maybe Trump's motive was a photo op, but, again, I don't know....I can't read his mind.

How about giving people credit for doing something good for others, no matter what one's opinion is of the politics of the person? The Democratic response of condemning Trump for bringing PlayDoh to children along with his thousands of other items smacks of desperation to find something "bad" to pin on Trump. The Dem PR team shot themselves in the foot with this one, imho. (And, of course, Trump's PR team makes plenty of stupid, desparate claims on Hillary, as well.)

August 22, 2016

It shows extreme arrogance and ignorance to nitpick and fault find with what Trump distributed. Those doing so claiming it should have been sustained help have never suddenly been homeless and two small children and another due in 6 weeks.

Those carrying items as this because they could not drive to the worst destruction will never be forgotten. When you can't diaper your baby, and you have three walls of your foundation left that diaper,formula,bottle and toy is a welcome sight most thankfully never have to appreciate.

I wish Trump would do a repeat. Hillary could go for a photo op and bring a truck load.

August 22, 2016

Trump Gave Out Much More Than Play Doh In Louisiana
by Jeff Dunetz | Aug 22, 2016 | Politics

Trump Gave Out Much More Than Play Doh In Louisiana
While trolling around twitter on Sunday evening, I noticed Samuel L. Jackson criticizing Donald Trump for passing out Play Doh:

Samuel L. Jackson ✔ @SamuelLJackson
Trump & Pence in La, passing out much needed supplies to victims of Flood. Where would Play Doh be on the list?!
12:46 PM - 20 Aug 2016

Jackson was one of many on twitter beating up on Trump for handing out Play Doh.
Now I would normally be the last person to argue with the former head of S.H.I.E.L.D, and narrator of the children’s book “Go The F**k To Sleep” but just in case he was bitten by one of those snakes on that plane, I decided to check out the charge Monday morning just to double check.

It is true that Trump sent an 18-wheeler full of supplies to meet him in Louisiana to hand out to the people whose lives were damaged by the flooding, and it is also true the truck contained some Play Doh. However, it is also true that Trump delivered much more than toys to the flood-ravaged people.
As reported by Snopes: “a[n ABC News] video of Trump helping to unload a truck clearly shows that he donated much more than Play-Doh . Play-Doh, diapers, baby formula, various toys, cleaning supplies and socks can be seen” in the video.
A CNN report (second video) added to the list saying the 18-wheeler Trump donated also had blankets and school supplies:
Trump spent approximately 20-25 minutes inside the command center and asked a lot of questions, according to [St. Amant Fire Chief James E.] LeBlanc. He also donated a 18-wheeler full of supplies and expressed concern for residents, damage to homes, how much water was in the area and if any assistance had been given by the federal government.

Not mentioned by Mr. Jackson but by others on Twitter was the mistaken reports that the Governor of Louisiana John Bel Edwards told Trump not to come, but as Governor Edwards told CNN the “don’t come” story was wrong. As a matter of fact Trump’s visit was very helpful.

Therefore the video evidence shows Mr. Jackson’s tweet was very wrong. Allow me to suggest that before he tweets again he ask himself this question, “What’s in YOUR news reader?”

August 23, 2016

@bonnie, are you ready to hand over the deed to the farm? Before betting the farm you might want to confirm that nobody in the flood region that received his very helpful lift of a box of play dough weren't among the first to blast him for his poser move for the cameras. Yes, mixed reactions of course. But indeed there were victims of the floods that in fact voiced their displeasure at his coming down and playing at helping out.

21 hours ago, Rossw said:

Can't think of a single thing.

Except if there from a Baton Rouge?

Thanks for helping prove the point...

and hang onto your outrage... He is planning a visit today. Timing is an important part of his visit so as not to impede rescue and aid deliveries. You do realize the significant use of local resources and disruption of traffic, etc. wherever the president travels, no matter who is president. That is standard Secret Service security protocol. That is part of the point. Immediately running down their when emergency response is still the priority and all resources are stretched to or beyond the limit does is not the time to divert them for a presidential visit. He would literally be getting in the way of actual help. I am fairly sure his people coordinate with local authorities to know when it would be OK to go to the area. Some of the criticism I read of Trump's photo op was that it happened even though the governor had asked him to not come down when he did.

August 23, 2016

@bonnie, are you ready to hand over the deed to the farm? Before betting the farm you might want to confirm that nobody in the flood region that received his very helpful lift of a box of play dough weren't among the first to blast him for his poser move for the cameras. Yes, mixed reactions of course. But indeed there were victims of the floods that in fact voiced their displeasure at his coming down and playing at helping out.

Nope,first I would like you to show me comments from those that were standing in line receiving blankets,formula,baby bottles,school supplies along with play dough or other toys for their kids that wished he had not come.

Again it is total ignorance to claim it was playing at helping out. I don't care why he did it. When you are standing in the middle of total disaster and cannot even diaper your child or give them a bottle and someone,anyone gives those items to you, it is not playing to those that receive.

If I would have been given a choice of a 100.00 bill or the diapers,water,and flashlight someone who was "playing at helping" gave me I would have taken the latter.

You can't diaper your baby with cash,a lot of times you can't even get to a store to spend that cash.Cash is not a great substitute for fresh water either.

This is a juvenile comment.......flood region that received his very helpful lift of a box of play dough

Again anyone that dismisses the importance of toys for kids at a time like this is showing complete ignorance of what it is like for those with families that have lost everything.. Cash donations are certainly needed but it is not always first and foremost ,hands on with the ordinary items is about the most welcome sight to see.

When we lost everything except three walls of the foundation with two babies and one due in six weeks ,those that came with items you and others are scorning were appreciated beyond what they or you will ever know.

The necessities came first,in fact began within hours,then the more sustainable help.

and hang onto your outrage... He is planning a visit today. Timing is an important part of his visit so as not to impede rescue and aid deliveries. You do realize the significant use of local resources and disruption of traffic, etc. wherever the president travels, no matter who is president. That is standard Secret Service security protocol. That is part of the point. Immediately running down their when emergency response is still the priority and all resources are stretched to or beyond the limit does is not the time to divert them for a presidential visit. He would literally be getting in the way of actual help. I am fairly sure his people coordinate with local authorities to know when it would be OK to go to the area. Some of the criticism I read of Trump's photo op was that it happened even though the governor had asked him to not come down when he did.

Why should I be outraged that he is going? From having been in that situation my personal preference is NO president come. I would prefer a fly over as Bush did,but not everyone feels that way. Unless they come with immediate aid their visit is just a look see.

I understand this....You do realize the significant use of local resources and disruption of traffic, etc. wherever the president travels, no matter who is president. That is standard Secret Service security protocol. That is part of the point. Immediately running down their when emergency response is still the priority and all resources are stretched to or beyond the limit does is not the time to divert them for a presidential visit. He would literally be getting in the way of actual help. I am fairly sure his people coordinate with local authorities to know when it would be OK to go to the area.

The same would have been true with Bush delaying his visit to Katrina,yet Obama didn't seem to understand that till now. Maybe he forgot his scorn of Bush for identically the same reasons

Maybe you should reread this.... Some of the criticism I read of Trump's photo op was that it happened even though the governor had asked him to not come down when he did.

Not mentioned by Mr. Jackson but by others on Twitter was the mistaken reports that the Governor of Louisiana John Bel Edwards told Trump not to come, but as Governor Edwards told CNN the “don’t come” story was wrong. As a matter of fact Trump’s visit was very helpful.

Therefore the video evidence shows Mr. Jackson’s tweet was very wrong. Allow me to suggest that before he tweets again he ask himself this question, “What’s in YOUR news reader?”

August 23, 2016

I think maybe Trump actually thought Play Doh was food... He is that out of touch.

August 23, 2016

47 minutes ago, Tom Wetmore said:

I think maybe Trump actually thought Play Doh was food... He is that out of touch.

I think maybe when someone responds in a petty and juvenile manner they are either jealous or angry that not everyone sees things their way.

What bothers you? The fact that Trump did this whatever his reason or that he got a bounce in the polls? That the receipents were grateful for some much needed items? Do you resent the flood victims from getting some much needed aid from someone you hate?

Usually when someone mocks or ridicules someone else"s gift to others they think they could have done better

What have you done personally,hands on for the flood victims. Not possibly writing a check but hands on to help them? Why do you resent their appreciation and gratitude for what they received?

August 24, 2016

I just thought this was the forum where outrageous unsubstantiated claims and hyperbolic propagandist rhetoric was the defining method of discourse....

Quite seriously, my statement was no more silly and stupid than many of the idiotic claims made in defense of Trump ad against Hilliary.

The tone and substance of political rhetoric in this election cycle truly take LBJ supposed statement of political strategy to an all time low. As in war, truth is the first and most serious casualty.

August 24, 2016

55 minutes ago, Tom Wetmore said:

I just thought this was the forum where outrageous unsubstantiated claims and hyperbolic propagandist rhetoric was the defining method of discourse....

Quite seriously, my statement was no more silly and stupid than many of the idiotic claims made in defense of Trump ad against Hilliary.

The tone and substance of political rhetoric in this election cycle truly take LBJ supposed statement of political strategy to an all time low. As in war, truth is the first and most serious casualty.

I just thought this was the forum where outrageous unsubstantiated claims and hyperbolic propagandist rhetoric was the defining method of discourse....

It seems more to diminish the actions of someone else. More in line with being a little upset that someone you hate is getting credit for something

Quite seriously, my statement was no more silly and stupid than many of the idiotic claims made in defense of Trump ad against Hilliary.

As this was not an ad this really is waaaaaaay of track. This was the news media making statements that were downright foolish and petty. I haven't seen any defense of any ads so far.

The tone and substance of political rhetoric in this election cycle truly take LBJ supposed statement of political strategy to an all time low. As in war, truth is the first and most serious casualty.

How did truth become a casualty? Or did you mean truth by the media was a casualty.

The silliness of this news story by the media certainly can be called truth by only a "certain" segment of those reading it.

Knowing there was far more than playdough in this semi that was portrayed as what Trump was delivering. They and you have showed complete ignorance of the situation and just how important a toy can be to a child that has lost his home and all they held dear.

That and how crucial to the flood victims those non-sustainable items handed out were.

I am not Trump fan, I am not even sure I will vote this year. The only thing I do know is I could never vote Hillary Clinton.

I will say I am not as opposed to Trump as I was. I still have the same objections to him as I had initially and put little by way of faith and trust in what he says,but like a lot of people,the media and comments like this on the forum soften the personal dislike I had of this man.

You are all bent out of shape because Trump received favorable press in some quarters for what he did. You have reserved the right to judge exactly why he did it. Not yours to do.

I have no idea of his true motives. I did find it interesting that over 20 years ago he was doing the same kinds of acts of generosity when there wasn't any political benefit to him at all. Why did he fly a little three year old for medical care he desperately needed when no one else would? I don't know but assume that you have the inside track on that. Why did he pay off the mortgage for a family that not only were losing their home but had lost their father/husband to suicide? Don't know the answer to that either? Do you?

You care,I don't care what his motives were. That is not between Trump and myself.

Sign In

With All The Criticisms Of Trump This is Hilarious

Recommended Posts

bonnie

Liberals Are Mad At Donald Trump For Handing Out Play-Doh In Louisiana

Bravus

bonnie

Tom Wetmore

bonnie

bonnie

Tom Wetmore

Tom Wetmore

Rossw

bonnie

Rossw

bonnie

rudywoofs (Pam)

bonnie

bonnie

Tom Wetmore

bonnie

Tom Wetmore

bonnie

Tom Wetmore

bonnie

Join the conversation

Browse

Activity