Is it true Illegal Aliens are getting Voter Registration?

[hobie]

This idea of Illegal Aliens getting voter registration was just a urban legend, right? Well lets look at what has come up..

"Illegal alien arrested by ICE found registered as active Democrat voter in blue state

After an illegal alien, Ian Andre Roberts, the superintendent of the Des Moines Public Schools in Iowa, was arrested by ICE, Republicans blew the whistle on the fact that he was a registered active Democrat voter in the state of Maryland.

According to the official website for the Maryland State Board of Elections, Roberts, who overstayed a student visa from 1999, has an active voter status and is registered as a Democrat in Maryland. The development was first reported on by columnist Dustin Grage.

Republican state Delegate Matt Morgan, who is chair of the Maryland House Freedom Caucus, told Fox News Digital that Roberts’ registration means that he is eligible to vote in all federal, state and local elections despite not being a U.S. citizen, and also despite likely not having lived in Maryland for the past decade.

Morgan explained that there is nothing in Maryland law allowing for non-citizens to be registered to vote in federal or state elections even if Roberts were still a legal resident...." Illegal alien arrested by ICE found registered as active Democrat voter in blue state

[Asia Joe]

After every election in the USA there are people convicted of voter fraud. That gets little attention. 

https://the2020election.org/voter-fraud-convictions-since-2016/

That is only 4 years. 

[Hanseng]

Legal immigrants of Roman Catholic origin may legally multiply children who eventually become voters furthering the papal agenda such as outlawing abortion and abrogation of the death penalty. Very clear how this works in California. RC Rose Bird was appointed by a RC, Jesuit seminarian, i.e., Jerry Brown.  She overturned every capital case she reviewed while Supreme Court justice. Gavin Newsom, another Jesuit educated governor, placed a moratorium on capital punishment.

Execution is not  cruel and unusual.  What's unusual is the medicalization of execution which requires incompetent individuals to start intravenous lines on inmates to infuse what is supposed to be a lethal cocktail comprised of difficult to obtain drugs That's cruel. Execution by firing squad is more or less foolproof. It's hard to goof up a bullet to the back of the head. .44 caliber bullets are easily acquired.

In ancient Israel, murder was avenged by the death of the perpetrator. If not, innocent blood would be imputed to the jurisdiction where the murder took place. The destruction of Judah, was, in part, because of the innocent blood which Manasseh shed. Wonder why California is vexed by earthquakes, drought, wildfires?  How about more than 500 murderers sentenced to death who have not been executed.

[Asia Joe]

Quote

Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state, stands out for disastrous alien voter registration, said Adams. The Keystone State has admitted a glitch in its “motor voter” program, which registers voters at the DMV, inadvertently has allowed approximately 100,000 non-citizens to register to vote, though some state officials dispute this number.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/illegal-immigrants-from-africa-india-and-china-are-voting-in-us-elections-here-s-how-they-re-doing-it/ar-AA1YLil1

[Asia Joe]

Attorney General Dana Nessel joined 24 attorneys general and governors in a lawsuit on Friday challenging President Trump’s recently announced Executive Order that tackles absentee voting by restricting voter eligibility and establishing federally authorized lists of absentee voters....

 

"Mail-in ballots are a safe and secure voting option that over 2.2 million Michiganders availed themselves to in the 2024 election, many who presumably used that choice to vote for this very President," said Nessel. "Michigan voters overwhelmingly voted to expand absentee voting in 2018.".....

State leaders say the order claims to lengthen the period for election officials to preserve records to simplify prosecutions.....

 

https://www.aol.com/articles/michigan-joins-lawsuit-challenging-trump-213945945.html

 

[hobie]

On 10/3/2025 at 8:34 PM, Asia Joe said:

After every election in the USA there are people convicted of voter fraud. That gets little attention. 

https://the2020election.org/voter-fraud-convictions-since-2016/

That is only 4 years. 

Well this is interesting...

"Ten days ago, the LA City Council voted to start moving noncitizen voting toward the ballot.

This week, the council ran away from it unanimously.

What happened in between? The proposal had to be written down.

Supporters said critics were overreacting. This was just the beginning of a conversation, they argued. The details would come later.

Well, the details came later.

And the details killed it.

Last week, city staff returned with the actual language needed to move the measure forward. That is when the wheels came off the car.

On Tuesday afternoon, the City Council unanimously voted to pull the proposal from the 2026 ballot and send it back for further study.

This is how bad policy gets laundered through City Hall. Politicians vote for a vague concept wrapped in moral language. They tell voters not to worry because the details will be worked out later. Then, once the authority has been granted, the real policy is written by the same politicians and activists who avoided spelling it out before the election.

That was the plan.

It just did not survive contact with paper.

The original council vote did not create noncitizen voting in LA, and it did not put noncitizen voting itself before voters. It started a process requiring city staff to come back with ballot language and a clearer explanation of what voters would be asked to approve.

Once that happened, the obvious questions became impossible to dodge. Who exactly would qualify to vote — green card holders, DACA recipients, temporary visa holders, illegal aliens? How would voter registration work? How would voter information be protected? Would LA have to create an entirely separate election system at taxpayer expense?

Those were not loose ends. They were the parts City Hall hoped voters would approve before anyone had to explain them.

Who gets to vote is not a detail. Whether illegal aliens are eligible is not a detail. Whether LA must build a separate election system is not a detail. Whether voter registration data could become accessible to immigration authorities is not a detail.

Those are the questions responsible lawmakers answer before they vote, not after.

The council voted first and asked questions later — an outrageous way to handle something as fundamental as voting rights.

Councilwoman Traci Park, who voted for the measure just two weeks earlier, eventually acknowledged the problem. Voters would not know what they were being asked to approve because the council itself did not yet know the answers. That admission should be stapled to every future attempt to revive this idea.

Councilman John Lee raised a concern that should matter especially to the left. San Francisco, the only California city that has implemented a noncitizen voting program, warns noncitizen voters that information provided during registration could potentially become available to immigration authorities. In other words, the same activists who frame this as pro-immigrant could be encouraging noncitizens to place their personal information into a government voting database with consequences they may not fully understand.

Supporters of the LA proposal wanted to rush ahead before answering even that basic question.

Even the proposal’s author, Councilman Hugo Soto-Martínez, appeared to recognize the political reality — acknowledging the need for more outreach and coalition building before bringing it back.

Translation: The votes, the details and the coalition were not ready.

That does not mean the idea is dead — supporters may come back in 2028 if they think the environment is friendlier. But this week’s unanimous retreat proves the original criticism was right.

LA voters were being asked to sign a blank check. The controversial parts were being pushed past the election, where future councilmembers could decide later who would vote, how broad eligibility would be and how the system would operate.

That is not transparency.

That is government by bait-and-switch.

Two weeks ago, the measure appeared headed toward the ballot. Today, it is not. The difference was not some sweeping new public debate or sudden discovery of principle inside City Hall. The difference was that the proposal finally had to be written down.

And once it was, even the LA City Council could not defend it.

If city leaders eventually bring noncitizen voting back, they should have the courage to tell the public exactly who would be eligible before the election takes place, not after. If they want illegal aliens voting in local elections, say so plainly and let voters decide that question directly.

For now, the measure is off the 2026 ballot. The scheme is not dead.

But LA City Hall just proved the critics right: Once the public could see what was actually being proposed, even the council could not stomach sending it to voters....." LA City Council tried to hide details of noncitizen voting — and failed