olger Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 Deadly Environmentalists Environmentalists, with the help of politicians and other government officials, have an agenda that has cost thousands of American lives. In the wake of Hurricane Betsy, which struck New Orleans in 1965, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed building flood gates on Lake Pontchartrain, like those in the Netherlands that protect cities from North Sea storms. In 1977, the gates were about to be built, but the Environmental Defense Fund and Save Our Wetlands sought a court injunction to block the project. According to John Berlau's recent book, "Eco-Freaks: Environmentalism is Hazardous to Your Health," U.S. Attorney Gerald Gallinghouse told the court that not building the gates could kill thousands of New Orleanians. Judge Charles Schwartz issued the injunction despite the evidence refuting claims of environmental damage. We're told that DDT is harmful to humans and animals. Berlau, a research fellow at the Washington, D.C-based Competitive Enterprise Institute, says, "Not a single study linking DDT exposure to human toxicity has ever been replicated." In one long-term study, volunteers ate 32 ounces of DDT for a year and a half, and 16 years later, they suffered no increased risk of adverse health effects. Despite evidence that, properly used, DDT is neither harmful to humans nor animals, environmental extremists fight for a continued ban. This has led to millions of illnesses and deaths from malaria, especially in Africa. After WWII, DDT saved millions upon millions of lives in India, Southeast Asia and South America. In some cases, malaria deaths fell to near zero. With bans on DDT, malaria deaths and illnesses have skyrocketed. Environmental extremists see DDT in a different light. Alexander King, co-founder of the Club of Rome, said, "In Guyana, within almost two years, it had almost eliminated malaria, but at the same time, the birth rate had doubled. So my chief quarrel with DDT in hindsight is that it greatly added to the population problem." Jeff Hoffman, environmental attorney, wrote on grist.org, "Malaria was actually a natural population control, and DDT has caused a massive population explosion in some places where it has eradicated malaria. More fundamentally, why should humans get priority over other forms of life? . . . I don't see any respect for mosquitos in these posts." Berlau's book cites many other examples of contempt for human life by environmentalists and how they've made politicians their useful idiots. In 2001, thousands of Americans perished in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. In the early 1970s, when the World Trade Center complex was built, the asbestos scare had just begun. The builders planned to use AsbestoSpray, a flame retardant that adhered to steel. The New York Port of Authority caved in to the environmentalists' asbestos scare and denied its use. An inferior substitute was used as fireproofing. After the attack, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) confirmed other experts' concerns about asbestos substitutes, concluding, "Even with the airplane impact and jet-fuel-ignited multi-floor fires, which were not normal building fires, the building would likely not have collapsed had it not been for the fireproofing." Through restrictions on asbestos use, our naval vessels are more vulnerable to our enemies, a disaster waiting in the wings. The Columbia spaceship disaster was a result of the EPA's demand that NASA not use freon in its thermal insulating foam. Congress mandates auto fuel mileage standards -- Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or CAFE, standards -- resulting in lighter, less crashworthy cars. In 2002, the National Academy of Sciences calculated that CAFE standards caused 2,000 additional traffic deaths each year. In 1999, a USA Today analysis of government and Insurance Institute data found that since the 1970s CAFE standards went into effect, 46,000 people died in crashes which they would have likely survived had they been riding in heavier cars. None of this is news to politicians. It's just that environmental extremists have the ears of politicians, and potential victims don't. Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com. Quote "Please don't feed the drama queens.."
Members phkrause Posted August 25, 2007 Members Posted August 25, 2007 Very interesting Olger. It does seem that what alot of other Countries allow, example: the Netherlands for one, we here in this country, politcians etc., vote againist. Do you think that money has a big influence in the matter. I think that is does. But I can't really be sure. pkrause Quote phkrause When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Neil D Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 What a bunch of hooey... Judge Charles Schwartz issued the injunction despite the evidence refuting claims of environmental damage..... "Not a single study linking DDT exposure to human toxicity has ever been replicated." .... The builders planned to use AsbestoSpray, a flame retardant that adhered to steel "Even with the airplane impact and jet-fuel-ignited multi-floor fires, which were not normal building fires, the building would likely not have collapsed had it not been for the fireproofing."....The Columbia spaceship disaster was a result of the EPA's demand that NASA not use freon in its thermal insulating foam.... Give me a break...such selective information here just to "prove" that enviormentalists are extreemists or that it is a religion unto itself....This is just a bunch of hooey.... Quote Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve. George Bernard Shaw
Dr. Shane Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 Walter Williams is an African-American, Libertarian, professor of economics. He certainly thinks outside the box and stimulates discussions that people probably would otherwise be having. I love reading and listening to him, mostly perhaps because he has such a great sense of humor. I question most of what he says but do not completely dismiss it. The Adventist church is jumping on the environmental bandwagon. Those that have Adventist TV have perhaps seen the PSAs we are now making that encourage environmentalism and talk shows that feature it as a central topic. I think that is appropriate. We are to be good stewards of the Earth. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
DrWhoCompanion Posted September 2, 2007 Posted September 2, 2007 "I think that is appropriate. We are to be good stewards of the Earth." I concur! Well said. Quote
Neil D Posted September 2, 2007 Posted September 2, 2007 DrWho welcome to Club Adventist...You will find a wide variety of opinions here....and some of them well entrenched. Don't be a stranger here...You will find much to your amusment and to your dismay.... Quote Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve. George Bernard Shaw
Moderators Jeannieb43 Posted September 9, 2007 Moderators Posted September 9, 2007 I read recently that since DDT has been outlawed there has been an increase in Lyme Disease in humans. Lyme Disease is carried by deer ticks. When it is not diagnosed early enough the antibiotics are powerless against it. The disease causes brain and muscle damage and permanent disability. Quote Jeannie<br /><br /><br />...Change is inevitable; growth is optional....
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.