Guest charis Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 I just received this from a friend.. No idea who wrote it, but it's an interesting concept.... Quote: THE JOB - URINE TEST I HAVE TO PASS A URINE TEST FOR MY JOB... SO I AGREE 100% Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is th e distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their A$$ doing drugs, while I work. . Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? Quote
Dr. Shane Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 I don't know if the state would save money. A lot of people wouldn't apply, a lot of kids would go hungry and end up being taken into state custody. I would favor making welfare recipients take random drug testing but would not favor requiring them to pass the tests in order to get assistance. Those failing the tests should simply have to go to an out-patient drug rehab program in order to continue getting assistance. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
DrWhoCompanion Posted November 15, 2007 Posted November 15, 2007 I'm with Shane. Welfare recipients don't live in a cut/dry world. We have programs like Drug Court to help get those willing off drugs and back into functioning society. And, as Shane says, what about the kids? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.