Dr. Shane Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Hmmm, Why would President Obama choose someone that has never been a judge and thus has no record to examine? I don't know what to think about that. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
Moderators John317 Posted May 11, 2010 Moderators Posted May 11, 2010 It's possible that he chose her for the very reason that she's liberal and has no track record on the bench that could make it difficult to get her confirmed. At least there's nothing in her legal decisions that are questionable and would offer the opposition ammunition against her. I think that was smart move on Obama's part, politically. Another smart move was that he ordered Holder to reverse himself on reading the miranda rights to arrested terrorists. That won't be done again, and I think it's the right decision. Quote John 3:16-17 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. [17] For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.
karl Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Hmmm, Why would President Obama choose someone that has never been a judge and thus has no record to examine? I don't know what to think about that. Obama's openly stated goal is to "fundamentally change" the USA. The Supreme Court deals with America's fundamentals of legality and constitutionality. He NEEDS justices who lack the experience and/or backbone to say, "Wait just a minute! That's WRONG!" This is why he had his little put-down of the Supreme Court at his State of the Union address. Trying to cow them into submission. Quote
Members phkrause Posted May 12, 2010 Members Posted May 12, 2010 It's possible that he chose her for the very reason that she's liberal and has no track record on the bench that could make it difficult to get her confirmed. At least there's nothing in her legal decisions that are questionable and would offer the opposition ammunition against her. I think that was smart move on Obama's part, politically. Another smart move was that he ordered Holder to reverse himself on reading the miranda rights to arrested terrorists. That won't be done again, and I think it's the right decision. I think she is a great pick. And agree with your second paragraph. pk Quote phkrause When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Woody Posted May 12, 2010 Posted May 12, 2010 what is there to like about her? Quote May we be one so that the world may be won. Christian from the cradle to the grave I believe in Hematology.
Members phkrause Posted May 12, 2010 Members Posted May 12, 2010 what is there to like about her? What is there to not like??? For one she is a woman, two, she is Jewish , three, she has no negative aspects, and 4th but not least, she's a New Yorker my home town. heheheh pk Quote phkrause When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Woody Posted May 12, 2010 Posted May 12, 2010 oh brother. I'm feeling sick .... Quote May we be one so that the world may be won. Christian from the cradle to the grave I believe in Hematology.
Dr. Shane Posted May 12, 2010 Author Posted May 12, 2010 I don't like people that have never been judges being placed on the Supreme Court. They have no record for us to review. I can't see anything good about that. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.