Koreas Security Situation 'Precarious'

[John317]

Clinton: Koreas security situation 'precarious'

, … By MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writer Matthew Lee, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 1 min ago

BEIJING – U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that North Korea's sinking of a South Korean warship has created a "highly precarious" security situation in the region and that the Obama administration is working to prevent an escalation of tension that could lead to conflict.

Speaking to reporters in Beijing shortly after the White House issued a statement offering Washington's full and unequivocal support for Seoul, Clinton said all of North Korea's neighbors, including its chief ally China, understand the seriousness of the matter and want to "contain" it.

"We are working hard to avoid an escalation of belligerence and provocation," Clinton said. "This is a highly precarious situation that the North Koreans have caused in the region."

The U.S. will work with other nations to see that North Korea feels the consequences of its actions and changes its behavior to avoid "the kind of escalation that would be very regrettable," she said.

Clinton would not discuss the details of what the United States might do but noted that President Barack Obama had ordered U.S. military commanders to "to ensure readiness and to deter future aggression" from North Korea. The United States has 28,500 troops in South Korea.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said earlier Monday that Seoul would cut all trade with the impoverished regime — part of measures primarily aimed at striking back at North Korea diplomatically and financially. He also vowed to take the incident to the U.N. Security Council for punishment over the March 26 sinking of the Cheonan warship.

Both the White House and Clinton said the U.S. strongly supported Lee's moves. But winning China's support for U.N. action against the North is critical as it is a veto-wielding permanent member of the panel and can block any move there.

Clinton is in Beijing for high-level strategic and economic talks and members of her delegation say she has an uphill battle to convince the Chinese either that North Korea sank the ship — something Pyongyang has denied — or to support new U.N. measures against the fellow communist nation.

China is North Korea's main ally and has so far remained neutral in the matter despite an international investigation that found the ship was sunk by an explosion caused by a torpedo fired from a North Korean submarine.

But Clinton said that as a result of her discussions with Chinese leaders on Sunday and Monday she believed they "recognize the gravity of the situation we face." "The Chinese understand the reaction by the South Koreans, and they also understand our unique responsibility for the peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula," she said.

Earlier Monday in an address to the opening of the high-level U.S.-China strategic and economic dialogue, Clinton urged China to work with the United States to coordinate a response to the sinking.

"We must work together ... to address this challenge and advance our shared objectives of peace and stability on the Korean peninsula," she said at Beijing's Great Hall of the People.

Clinton was joined onstage at China's Great Hall of the People by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Chinese Vice Premier Wang Qishan and State Councilor Dai Bingguo, all of whom spoke. Neither Wang nor Dai specifically mentioned North Korea or Iran, but Dai made clear in that China would not support any attempt to provoke conflict.

"No attempt to stir up confrontation and stage war, be it a hot war, a cold war or even a warm war, will be popular in today's world," he said. "Nor will such an attempt lead to anywhere."

Similarly, Chinese President Hu Jintao, who also addressed the opening session, did not mention North Korea by name but spoke of the responsibilities shared by the United States and China for "managing regional hotspots" and "safeguarding world peace and security."

Speaking later, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Ma Zhaoxu, repeated China's standard noncommittal response when asked about Clinton's call, telling reporters only that China hoped "all the relevant parties will exercise restraint and remain coolheaded, appropriately handle issues of concern and prevent escalation of the event."

"We always believe that we should adopt a fair and objective perspective and dealing with international matters on the merits of the situation," he said. "I think that principle applies to the handling of the Cheonan incident."

___

Associated Press writer Joe McDonald contributed to this report.

[phkrause]

Good article John, thanks for the post.

pk

[Guest truthseeker007]

since i study international relations, i wanna shed sum light on this matter.

This is what i think is going on;

Kim Jung Il knows he has no good succesor, his own son doesn t want to rule the country, furthermore Kim jung Il knows his health is not very good. He knows he doesn t live forever. In adittion he is a real fan of trained bodyguards, the military etc.

Now keep these facts in mind and think about this; his country is very very poor. Recently he went to China where he had to beg for economic help. Now South Korea just suspended all economic relations with North Korea. So basically the country is dying. Now rationally, i you are Kim Jung ill, and you have the biggest military in the world (1.1 mil. soldiers), i would attack a South Korean marine ship by purpose. They know that in that way it is not an all out act of agression. So in case of a war they still have a chance that they are backed by China. But even when they are not supported by China, they have the ability to invade south Korea, posess the resources like Japan did in WW2. What happens next is that the international community wants to respond, but then North Korea will threaten the world with nukes and tries to consolidate the unified Korea.

This is my prediction...

[John317]

Won't work. I doubt if he's that insane.

North Korea's military is no match for the South and for the US.

Only time will tell for sure what he's up to, though. Hope you're wrong, and you no doubt hope the same.

[Guest truthseeker007]

i have been praying for the end of Kim Jung il a while ago. i hope my prediction is wrong too, but i doubt it. North Korea is really mad, i mean they have got like concentration camps where they torture whole families like the catholic church tortured protestants in the middle ages. The Junta regime is at a crucial point. Because of its isolation and the growing importance of world connections for state power, it has two options; either it stays isolated and implodes, which means the end of the communist regime, or it expands, capturing new resources. I think North Korea knows exactly what it is doing. It has been preparing for times like these a long time. watch my words, what happens now is more sanctions on a country that is already starving, soon they even won t have enough food to feed their soldiers! If North Korea does indeed have a nuke then i am sure they ll feel assured, but i doubt whether they have had the means to enrich uranium till 90 percent levels.

Well, time will tell. But don t be surprised if North Korea suddenly begins an all out war.

[phkrause]

Truthseeker I'm in agreement with you. You do realize that they have the biggest army in the world. From what I understand its 600,000 foot soldiers. Of course they have no navy or air force to speak of. I do remember when Bush was in the WH they were thinking about taking on NK but decided against it, don't remember the reason's one way or the other.

pk

[phkrause]

Amen dgrimm.

pk