Mort Zuckerman: World Sees Obama as Incompetent and Amateur

[bonnie]

Mort Zuckerman: World Sees Obama as Incompetent and Amateur

The president is well-intentioned but can't walk the walk on the world stage

By Mortimer B. Zuckerman

Posted June 18, 2010

President Obama came into office as the heir to a great foreign policy legacy enjoyed by every recent U.S. president. Why? Because the United States stands on top of the power ladder, not necessarily as the dominant power, but certainly as the leading one. As such we are the sole nation capable of exercising global leadership on a whole range of international issues from security, trade, and climate to counterterrorism. We also benefit from the fact that most countries distrust the United States far less than they distrust one another, so we uniquely have the power to build coalitions. As a result, most of the world still looks to Washington for help in their region and protection against potential regional threats.

Click here to find out more!

Yet, the Iraq war lingers; Afghanistan continues to be immersed in an endless cycle of tribalism, corruption, and Islamist resurgence; Guantánamo remains open; Iran sees how North Korea toys with Obama and continues its programs to develop nuclear weapons and missiles; Cuba spurns America's offers of a greater opening; and the Palestinians and Israelis find that it is U.S. policy positions that defer serious negotiations, the direct opposite of what the Obama administration hoped for.

The reviews of Obama's performance have been disappointing. He has seemed uncomfortable in the role of leading other nations, and often seems to suggest there is nothing special about America's role in the world. The global community was puzzled over the pictures of Obama bowing to some of the world's leaders and surprised by his gratuitous criticisms of and apologies for America's foreign policy under the previous administration of George W. Bush. One Middle East authority, Fouad Ajami, pointed out that Obama seems unaware that it is bad form and even a great moral lapse to speak ill of one's own tribe while in the lands of others.

Even in Britain, for decades our closest ally, the talk in the press—supported by polls—is about the end of the "special relationship" with America. French President Nicolas Sarkozy openly criticized Obama for months, including a direct attack on his policies at the United Nations. Sarkozy cited the need to recognize the real world, not the virtual world, a clear reference to Obama's speech on nuclear weapons. When the French president is seen as tougher than the American president, you have to know that something is awry. Vladimir Putin of Russia has publicly scorned a number of Obama's visions. Relations with the Chinese leadership got off to a bad start with the president's poorly-organized visit to China, where his hosts treated him disdainfully and prevented him from speaking to a national television audience of the Chinese people. The Chinese behavior was unprecedented when compared to visits by other U.S. presidents.

Obama's policy on Afghanistan—supporting a surge in troops, but setting a date next year when they will begin to withdraw—not only gave a mixed signal, but provided an incentive for the Taliban just to wait us out. The withdrawal part of the policy was meant to satisfy a domestic constituency, but succeeded in upsetting all of our allies in the region. Further anxiety was provoked by Obama's severe public criticism of Afghan President Hamid Karzai and his coterie of family and friends for their lackluster leadership, followed by a reversal of sorts regarding the same leaders.

Obama clearly wishes to do good and means well. But he is one of those people who believe that the world was born with the word and exists by means of persuasion, such that there is no person or country that you cannot, by means of logical and moral argument, bring around to your side. He speaks as a teacher, as someone imparting values and generalities appropriate for a Sunday morning sermon, not as a tough-minded leader. He urges that things "must be done" and "should be done" and that "it is time" to do them. As the former president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Les Gelb, put it, there is "the impression that Obama might confuse speeches with policy." Another journalist put it differently when he described Obama as an "NPR [National Public Radio] president who gives wonderful speeches." In other words, he talks the talk but doesn't know how to walk the walk. The Obama presidency has so far been characterized by a well-intentioned but excessive belief in the power of rhetoric with too little appreciation of reality and loyalty.

In his Cairo speech about America and the Muslim world, Obama managed to sway Arab public opinion but was unable to budge any Arab leader. Even the king of Saudi Arabia, a country that depends on America for its survival, reacted with disappointment and dismay. Obama's meeting with the king was widely described as a disaster. This is but one example of an absence of the personal chemistry that characterized the relationships that Presidents Clinton and Bush had with world leaders. This is a serious matter because foreign policy entails an understanding of the personal and political circumstances of the leaders as well as the cultural and historical factors of the countries we deal with.

[John317]

Wow! Sure hope none of it's true. Couldn't be a bleaker picture of the way foreign leaders see our President. I think that's the worst foreign policy review that I've ever seen in regard to any American President in my lifetime, bar none.

[bonnie]

Wow! Sure hope none of it's true. Couldn't be a bleaker picture of the way foreign leaders see our President. I think that's the worst foreign policy review that I've ever seen in regard to any American President in my lifetime, bar none.

I think it is all true. Or it seems to be when you read what many world leaders have to say.

Even old Castro,smoozed by the black delegation that went to Cuba and "looked in his eyes" said just recently that Obama lived in a fantasy

[doug yowell]

Originally Posted By: John317

Wow! Sure hope none of it's true. Couldn't be a bleaker picture of the way foreign leaders see our President. I think that's the worst foreign policy review that I've ever seen in regard to any American President in my lifetime, bar none.

I think it is all true. Or it seems to be when you read what many world leaders have to say.

Even old Castro,smoozed by the black delegation that went to Cuba and "looked in his eyes" said just recently that Obama lived in a fantasy

Presidsent Obama is merely the poster boy for the far left wing of the Democratic party.His moralistic idealism reminds me of a college student whose professors have convinced him that if only someone with their wisdom could run this country this world would be a nicer, safer place. IOW it's all the fault of Republican foreign policies. Well, welcome back to the real world America.Ya only got 3 more years left to make us loveable again!

[Dr. Shane]

Considering that Mort Zuckerman is an influential liberal, the commentary is rather damaging.

[karl]

Zuckerman helped get Hussein BO elected.

[Dr. Shane]

A lot of influential liberals did. That makes their criticism now all the more damaging.