there buster Posted March 19, 2005 Posted March 19, 2005 Some concern has been expressed about whether humor is appropriate to serious Bible students. I offer here, a delicious little piece by one of my favorite theologians, a professor at Fuller Theological Seminary. Chocolate Theology. A merry heart is good medicine, so humor must have been invented by God. Quote “the slovenliness of our language makes it easier to have foolish thoughts.” George Orwell
Moderators Nan Posted March 19, 2005 Moderators Posted March 19, 2005 A little off topic but not totally - Anyone working in the health field will know that the current trend is towards Evidenced Based Medicine. The best evidence for any practice comes from Randomised Controlled Trials, even better double blinded randomised controlled trials, when both subjects and authors are blinded about the treatment arm in which the subject has been placed. Last year one of the very prestigious British medical journals had an article on the lack of randomised controlled trials for the use of parachutes in sky diving. In spite of the lack of best evidence, people continue to use parachutes.... <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> Quote
Michelle Posted March 20, 2005 Posted March 20, 2005 Ed--I was thinking of that verse exactly. I know there are some who think everyone/thing should be black-veiled and sombre and speak in lowered tones (except when voices are raised in . . . um, discussion!). Tiptoe and all. I love seeing people's sense of humor--to me, that is what shows a person's real self. I grew up surrounded by people with off-beat senses of humor and feel right at home with it. Why can't serious Bible students have a sense of humor????? M Quote
Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted March 20, 2005 Moderators Posted March 20, 2005 Re: "Last year one of the very prestigious British medical journals had an article on the lack of randomised controlled trials for the use of parachutes in sky diving. In spite of the lack of best evidence, people continue to use parachutes.... " It is a misunderstanding of science to think that science always requires randomized, double-blind, studies. Science can properly study the use of parachutes without doing so. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" /> Data does exist on people who have descended from an aircraft without using a fully deployed parachute. The effect on those people can be compared with the data that exists on those who have descended using a fully deployed parachute. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" /> In fact, such a study could be quite helpful. The existing data supports a gradient. i.e. People have descended with a partially deployed parachute, and with flyable, and non-flyable types. Introducing such variables into the study of the data would likely provide well substantiated conclusions. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/coolhello.gif" alt="" /> Quote Gregory
Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted March 20, 2005 Moderators Posted March 20, 2005 On a more serious side: I round with Internal Medicine Residents. The teaching professor constantly challenges them to provide their "evidenced-based" medicine. Yet, at times he simply states: There is no evidence to support that. But, it makes common sense. I also would have done that. Common sense has not departed from medical practice. Quote Gregory
Moderators Nan Posted March 20, 2005 Moderators Posted March 20, 2005 </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr /> It is a misunderstanding of science to think that science always requires randomized, double-blind, studies. Science can properly study the use of parachutes without doing so. <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> Taking my professional life in my hands, I will only say that you are talking science - I was talking of medicine <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> .......and running very hard. Common sense does seem to be conspicuous by its absence sometimes but I believe the author of the parachute article was trying to draw attention to the need to employ same. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" /> Quote
Moderators Jeannieb43 Posted March 20, 2005 Moderators Posted March 20, 2005 </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr /> I offer here, a delicious little piece by one of my favorite theologians, a professor at Fuller Theological Seminary. Chocolate Theology. <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> Is this Dr. Augsburger related to the late Dr. Daniel Augsburger who taught at Andrews University for many years?? Quote Jeannie<br /><br /><br />...Change is inevitable; growth is optional....
there buster Posted March 20, 2005 Author Posted March 20, 2005 Quote: Is this Dr. Augsburger related to the late Dr. Daniel Augsburger who taught at Andrews University for many years?? Not to my knowledge. Dr. Augsburger at Andrews was one of my favorite professors, favorite Christians, and favorite human beings, with whom I was privileged to have a relationship outside the classroom as well. I mourned his passing, as recorded in the AU alumni journal, but have no doubt that his sleep is peaceful and temporary. Quote “the slovenliness of our language makes it easier to have foolish thoughts.” George Orwell
Moderators Jeannieb43 Posted March 20, 2005 Moderators Posted March 20, 2005 </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr /> Dr. Augsburger at Andrews was one of my favorite professors, favorite Christians, and favorite human beings, with whom I was privileged to have a relationship outside the classroom as well. <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> Well, I wasn't privileged to work with him after graduation, but I did take one undergrad class from him many years ago. And at my 40th* class reunion he surprised me by coming up to me at the luncheon, calling me by name and embracing me fondly. I was overwhelmed. Found out later that it was his habit to study the yearbooks of each of the honored classes, just before the alumni weekend, and memorize names and faces all over again -- so he was able to call each alum by name when he met them. ========== * Afterthought: Maybe it was the 35th. Quote Jeannie<br /><br /><br />...Change is inevitable; growth is optional....
NormF Posted March 21, 2005 Posted March 21, 2005 Nan said, Quote: Common sense does seem to be conspicuous by its absence sometimes but I believe the author of the parachute article was trying to draw attention to the need to employ same. ... all of which brings us back to one of my favorite aphorisms, the self-evident nature of minds and parachutes, and how they work better when open. Unfortunately, I am contributing to the stray towards OT. Regards, Norm (We now return you to our regularly scheduled chocolate ...) Quote Debile fundamentum, fallit opus. - "Where there is a weak foundation, the work falls."
jasd Posted March 21, 2005 Posted March 21, 2005 elliptically soliloquizing, sorta… There is humor that uplifts, causes merriness of spirit and brings a smile to the lip. There’s Charlie Brown, Lucy, and Linus; and there’s Beavis and Butthead. There is the humor of a Jay Leno and there is that of a George Carlin. There is humor that is ironic, insinuative, allusional, illusional, sarcastic, farcical, etc. And there is humor that is plain dinkin’ mean, disgustingly mean, aberrantly mean, … And there is the alliteratively snip, snit, snide, snicker mean; ignoble, base, mean. There is transparent humor and there is opaque humor. There is oblique humor, and there is directed humor. There is the villainous humor that needs a butt --someone else’s. There is the humor that is perverted smut --not limited to sexual depravity. And then there is the humor likened to a suppurating and leprous ear beneath softly covering strands of sycophancy --and secret handshakes. And there is the Sawyeresque humor whitewashing pickets of the pale, with wash of water, size, and lime --the lime of latrine pits and carcasses. The recoil caustic and the jellyroll chortle The chocolate and the schmocolate -- that’s humor. And, the gosh-thankful Jewish: “Oedipus, Schmedipus, just love your mother.” And the Xtian sublime: “It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Or is it? depends upon the voice, doesn’t it? “…define your terms.” --Voltaire Quote
wicklunds Posted March 28, 2005 Posted March 28, 2005 Actually religious people are some of the most funny you'll ever meet. Can you think of any funny theologians or religious upper-crustmen (or women)? I sure can. There are those that are prune-faced and torturously pious but I think the ones who are more humorously charismatic make the memories stick better. Quote It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy. {ST, February 19, 1894 par. 4}
DaveM1936 Posted March 28, 2005 Posted March 28, 2005 I understand that Jesus smiled a lot. He was pleasant and cheerful. "Chritians" who are soar faced and grim drive people away. I have never enjoyed being around humorless people. Even God has a sense of humor. Giraffes. Duck-billed platypus. dogs. Hummingbirds. Turtles. etc. I believe He must have enjoyed Himself when He created all the varieties of flowers, birds, fish, animals. EGW tells us to pick the flowers and leave the thorns alone. Looking for the pleasant and good things in people, animals, birds, etc makes life easier and more happy. By the way, chocolat is my major weakness. I wait for the after holiday candy sales to stock up on the left-over chocolat so that I have some to last until the next holiday. Your friend, Dave M Quote
Planey Posted March 28, 2005 Posted March 28, 2005 Quote: Actually religious people are some of the most funny you'll ever meet. And some of them even intend to be... Graeme Quote Graeme____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
wicklunds Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Quote: And some of them even intend to be... Graeme Hehe toucheeee Graeme Quote It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy. {ST, February 19, 1894 par. 4}
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.