Jump to content
ClubAdventist

Recommended Posts

Posted

zoo.mn/o3pe3p

Williams-Sonoma Must Stop Asking Customers for Zip Code in California

The California Supreme Court has ruled that Williams-Sonoma, and accordingly other retailers in the state, cannot ask for a customer’s zip code when handling an in-store credit card transaction.

According to the decision, one’s zip code is considered “personal identification information” under the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 — precisely the kind of information that cannot be lawfully obtained by a merchant during a credit card transaction under that law.

The statute defines “personal identification information” as “information concerning the cardholder, other than information set forth on the credit card, and including, but not limited to, the cardholder’s address and telephone number.”

The lower court found that a zip code is not included in this definition, and the appeals court affirmed. The California Supreme Court, however, overturned that decision, focusing heavily on the statute’s intent of prohibiting a retailer from compiling “information unnecessary to the sales transaction that, alone or together with other data such as a cardholder’s name or credit card number, can be used for the retailer’s business purposes.”

The court also rejected Williams-Sonoma’s arguments that the act was unconstitutionally vague and that the legislature didn’t intend for the law to prevent retailers from targeting customers through mail order catalogs.

The court further ruled that the decision can be applied retroactively to customer credit card transactions that have already taken place, which could end up being a very big deal for Williams-Sonoma and other merchants as each violation of the act carries a $1,000 fine.

The court faced this question because of a class action lawsuit that has been filed against Williams-Sonoma based on the zip code request practice. Plaintiff Jessica Pineda cited violations of both the above-mentioned act as well as her privacy. The complaint alleges that Williams-Sonoma uses the zip codes to identify targets for further marketing such as the sending of catalogs or even to sell the address information to other retailers.

Reuters notes that states such as Delaware, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Nevada, and Rhode Island have laws similar to the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, so it remains to be seen whether the zip code requests will eventually be prohibited in those states as well.

If you receive benefit to being here please help out with expenses.

https://www.paypal.me/clubadventist

Administrator of a few websites like https://adventistdating.com

 

Posted

I really couldn't care less if they want my zip code. But for people who are concerned about that, might I suggest using cash? Cash purchases don't require any personal identification.

Posted

Wow! That's a shame because Radio Shack has a lot of stuff you can't normally find anywhere else.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...