Jump to content
ClubAdventist

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted

Perry Cain 2012, please, please, please.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

I would be interested in seeing Perry's response to that concern. As a governor, he may have believed the state could better manage a social security program than the federal government - and it probably could.

Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com 

Author of  Peculiar Christianity

  • Moderators
Posted

He just said that Rove is sometimes over the top in his comments. Also he said social security is a monstrous lie.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

  • Administrators
Posted

Dick Chaney said essentially the same thing about Perry.

"Absurdity reigns and confusion makes it look good."

"Sinless perfection is such a shallow goal."

"I love God only as much as the person I love the least."

*Forgiveness is always good news. And that is the gospel truth.

(And finally, the ideas expressed above are solely my person views and not that of any organization with which I am associated.)

  • Moderators
Posted

I'm surprised how unimpressive Perry has been so far, the debate.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

  • Moderators
Posted

Here's the surprise. Romney was more impressive than I thought he would be. He was quite smooth.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

Romney is smooth. He has to address Romneycare if he is going to get the nomination. I think he will win New Hampshire unless something goes wrong between now and then.

Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com 

Author of  Peculiar Christianity

  • Moderators
Posted

Santorum: Why is he there?

Bachmann: Rapidly becoming an also ran.

Gingritch: Cuts a nice father figure.

Romney: Cool as a cucumber.

Perry: Has a lot of work to do.

Paul: THe Nutty pRofesSOr.

Huntsman: Nice but a bit weird.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

  • Moderators
Posted

Oops, Cain: Too sharp, Too articulate, Too "cute'

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

Cain is Able

g

"Please don't feed the drama queens.."

Posted

If I had my choice, I would choose Huntsman. My second choice would be Romney and my third choice would be Perry. That is, if I am thinking about which would be best for the country. Of course if Perry wins it will be best for me personally because I live in Texas.

I am still willing to vote for Obama if he can get unemployment well under 8% before the election. I don't buy his blame Bush or blame Republicans. He is the man. Reagan dealt with a Democratic Congress his entire 8 years. If Obama can't get things done on a bi-partisan basis, we need to move on to the next guy.

Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com 

Author of  Peculiar Christianity

  • Moderators
Posted

If I had my choice, I would choose Huntsman. My second choice would be Romney and my third choice would be Perry. That is, if I am thinking about which would be best for the country. Of course if Perry wins it will be best for me personally because I live in Texas.

I wouldn't vote for Obama at this point, and I do like Cain.

My first choice would be Perry-Cain, but I doubt it will happen. My second choice would be a Perry-Romney ticket.

John 3:16-17

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. [17] For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.

Posted

Men continue to look for that knight in shining armor. What is that observation, "He who forgets the lessons of history, are doomed to repeat them"?

And the description of insanity, "to repeat the same activity time after time, expecting different results".

God blesses! peace

Lift Jesus up!!

Posted

If I had my choice, I would choose Huntsman. My second choice would be Romney and my third choice would be Perry. That is, if I am thinking about which would be best for the country. Of course if Perry wins it will be best for me personally because I live in Texas.

I am still willing to vote for Obama if he can get unemployment well under 8% before the election. I don't buy his blame Bush or blame Republicans. He is the man. Reagan dealt with a Democratic Congress his entire 8 years. If Obama can't get things done on a bi-partisan basis, we need to move on to the next guy.

I have to admit, Huntsman was the more sane person of all the bunch....and willing to work with dem....Romney is more appealing to the centrist personalities....but if Huntsman gets his message out there, there just might be a real race...

Obama still has good ideas, the problem is that republicans are just stonewalling anything the dems put out there...

Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.

 

George Bernard Shaw

 

Posted

Obama still has good ideas, the problem is that republicans are just stonewalling anything the dems put out there...

Obama has no one to blame but himself for the Republicans acting the way they are. What comes around goes around. Remember the size of the gavel that Nanci Pelosi had when during the health-care vote? The Republicans do. When Obama won he stuck his middle finger in the face of every Republican. Now he wants to be bi-partisan.

Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com 

Author of  Peculiar Christianity

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...