Dr. Shane Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Ann Coulter endorses Romney. She was on Glen Beck's show last week blasting Gingrich If Not Romney, Who? If Not Now, When Quote: In addition to having an affair in the middle of Clinton's impeachment; apologizing to Jesse Jackson on behalf of J.C. Watts -- one of two black Republicans then in Congress –- for having criticized "poverty pimps," and then inviting Jackson to a State of the Union address; cutting a global warming commercial with Nancy Pelosi; supporting George Soros' candidate Dede Scozzafava in a congressional special election; appearing in public with the Rev. Al Sharpton to promote nonspecific education reform; and calling Paul Ryan's plan to save Social Security "right-wing social engineering," we found out this week that Gingrich was a recipient of Freddie Mac political money. I bet Obama would rather run against Gingrich than Romney. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
Moderators John317 Posted December 5, 2011 Moderators Posted December 5, 2011 I bet Obama would rather run against Gingrich than Romney. I think you're right, but I bet Obama doesn't want to debate Gingrich. He would doubtless much rather debate Romney, although Romney is also a good debater. I think Gingrich's nomination would energize Obama's base in a way that Romney's wouldn't. Personally I am fine with either man. I agree more with Gingrich than with Romney. I would like to see both men on the same ticket, but I doubt that happens. Quote John 3:16-17 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. [17] For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.
Dr. Shane Posted December 6, 2011 Author Posted December 6, 2011 I think Gingrich's nomination would energize Obama's base in a way that Romney's wouldn't. You are exactly right. If the Republicans want to give the Democrats a reason to show up to the polls, they should nominate Gingrich. If Republicans want Democrats to sit at home on election day, they should nominate Romney. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
bonnie Posted December 6, 2011 Posted December 6, 2011 Originally Posted By: John317 I think Gingrich's nomination would energize Obama's base in a way that Romney's wouldn't. You are exactly right. If the Republicans want to give the Democrats a reason to show up to the polls, they should nominate Gingrich. If Republicans want Democrats to sit at home on election day, they should nominate Romney. That alone should make any wonder why unless of course???? Quote Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this. Quotes by Susan Gottesman
Moderators lazarus Posted December 6, 2011 Moderators Posted December 6, 2011 Personally I am fine with either man. I agree more with Gingrich than with Romney. I would like to see both men on the same ticket, but I doubt that happens. Problem is that both men are not conservative enough for conservatives. Newt has way too many issues which will eventually become clear. I think there's a strong possibility of an outsider to step in, The current line up is a disaster for the GOP chances. Quote Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence. Einstein
bonnie Posted December 6, 2011 Posted December 6, 2011 Originally Posted By: John317 Personally I am fine with either man. I agree more with Gingrich than with Romney. I would like to see both men on the same ticket, but I doubt that happens. Problem is that both men are not conservative enough for conservatives. Newt has way too many issues which will eventually become clear. I think there's a strong possibility of an outsider to step in, The current line up is a disaster for the GOP chances. Most are well aware of the "many issues" of Newt Quote Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this. Quotes by Susan Gottesman
Moderators lazarus Posted December 6, 2011 Moderators Posted December 6, 2011 Most are well aware of the "many issues" of Newt That's not the "many" that care. they just want to win. Quote Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence. Einstein
Dr. Shane Posted December 6, 2011 Author Posted December 6, 2011 The current line up is a disaster for the GOP chances. I disagree. I think Romney is a fine candidate. Huntsman is very low in the polls but he is another fine candidate. Santorium is also low in the polls and a bit more conservative than what I like but could certainly beat Obama. Romney and Huntsman, both having been governors, are obviously the best choices. Gingrich is Obama's best chance to win re-election. Gingrich is a scholar and very qualified. That is not the issue. The issue is that he is so hated by the Left. He is probably hated more than Bush because Gingrich actually succeeded in impeaching the Left's favorite President. If Gingrich gets the nomination it will mean Democrats will be able to raise hundreds of millions more dollars to defeat him than if Romney or another Republican wins. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
bonnie Posted December 6, 2011 Posted December 6, 2011 Originally Posted By: bonnie Most are well aware of the "many issues" of Newt That's not the "many" that care. they just want to win. Anyone that can/does beats Obama will be far better than him. I still think it will come down to how many more Obama can pile in the wagon before election day and to blazes with the results of that Quote Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this. Quotes by Susan Gottesman
Members phkrause Posted December 6, 2011 Members Posted December 6, 2011 I still think it will come down to how many more Obama can pile in the wagon before election day and to blazes with the results of that And the other side doesn't do the same thing???? Who are we kidding? Quote phkrause When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Members phkrause Posted December 6, 2011 Members Posted December 6, 2011 I agree Shane, I think Romney is a great candidate and could beat Obama. But so can any other candidate be it Republican or Democrat. It will be the people of this country that will say who wins. Just like in "08 the people were tired of what was going on and wanted a change, so they elected Obama or who ever the democrats would have had as the candidate. Its gonna be the same in this election, are they again ready for a change or are they still tired of the Republicans. Quote phkrause When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.