Hey Liberals, Non-Muslims Are Not the Problem

[Guest]

by Chris Graham

On September 13, actress Bette Midler wrote on her Twitter page, “Who are the idiots who made the video and put it on YouTube? When do we meet them? They should be charged with murder.”

The video she is referring to is, as I’m sure you know, the ultra-low-budget anti-Islam film that the media and the White House are saying “caused” the rioting in Cairo, Libya, and other Muslim-dominated cities..

Here’s the way liberal logic works: Somebody offended some Muslim; those Muslims killed some innocent people; the anti-Muslim film and those who made it are accomplices in the murder of the four embassy staff members in Cairo. This despite the following from The Washington Post:

“But senior U.S. officials and Middle East analysts raised questions Wednesday about the motivation for the Benghazi attack, noting that it . . . followed an al-Qaeda call to avenge the death of a senior Libyan member of the terrorist network.”

So it appears the murder of four American embassy workers, one an ambassador, was actually retaliation for the killing of a Libyan terrorist, not for an amateur film made by, well, we really don’t know. If the blame-game is as Midler explains it, then the Obama Administration is complicit since Obama’s folks ordered the killing.

What would Bette Midler’s say if an emotionally unstable woman had seen one of her movies and subsequently, because of the movie’s depressing story, committed suicide? Would Ms. Midler turn herself in for murder? Does she also believe Al Gore should be charged for the murder-suicide of an Argentinean husband and wife who, fearing the global warming Gore kept saying was going to get everybody in the future, shot their 2-year-old in the back, their 7-month-old in the chest, and then killed themselves?

Muslims in the Middle East do not need provocation. Drawing a picture of Mohammed, as one Danish cartoonist did, is not provocation. The satire publication called The Onion ran a comic of Buddha, Jesus, Ganesh, and Moses engaging in an orgy. Is that not provocative? Of course it is. But the body count was zero because Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, and Jews are not bloodthirsty psychotics.

And yesterday, more peaceful Muslims stormed yet more embassies, one of them being the German embassy in Sudan. The Muslims planted the Islamic flag at the site and set the building aflame.

It’s been assumed that they chose the German embassy because German Chancellor Angela Merkel, bless her heart, gave an award to the aforementioned Danish cartoonist who dared draw Mohammed.

We know who the problem is and it is most certainly not non-Muslims. If Christians were as “peaceful” as Muslims are, every church in America with a picture of Jesus would be a smoldering ash heap.

http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/09/hey-liberals-non-muslims-are-not-the-problem/#ixzz26fWSXRNs

[bonnie]

by Chris Graham

On September 13, actress Bette Midler wrote on her Twitter page, “Who are the idiots who made the video and put it on YouTube? When do we meet them? They should be charged with murder.”

The video she is referring to is, as I’m sure you know, the ultra-low-budget anti-Islam film that the media and the White House are saying “caused” the rioting in Cairo, Libya, and other Muslim-dominated cities..

Here’s the way liberal logic works: Somebody offended some Muslim; those Muslims killed some innocent people; the anti-Muslim film and those who made it are accomplices in the murder of the four embassy staff members in Cairo. This despite the following from The Washington Post:

“But senior U.S. officials and Middle East analysts raised questions Wednesday about the motivation for the Benghazi attack, noting that it . . . followed an al-Qaeda call to avenge the death of a senior Libyan member of the terrorist network.”

So it appears the murder of four American embassy workers, one an ambassador, was actually retaliation for the killing of a Libyan terrorist, not for an amateur film made by, well, we really don’t know. If the blame-game is as Midler explains it, then the Obama Administration is complicit since Obama’s folks ordered the killing.

What would Bette Midler’s say if an emotionally unstable woman had seen one of her movies and subsequently, because of the movie’s depressing story, committed suicide? Would Ms. Midler turn herself in for murder? Does she also believe Al Gore should be charged for the murder-suicide of an Argentinean husband and wife who, fearing the global warming Gore kept saying was going to get everybody in the future, shot their 2-year-old in the back, their 7-month-old in the chest, and then killed themselves?

Muslims in the Middle East do not need provocation. Drawing a picture of Mohammed, as one Danish cartoonist did, is not provocation. The satire publication called The Onion ran a comic of Buddha, Jesus, Ganesh, and Moses engaging in an orgy. Is that not provocative? Of course it is. But the body count was zero because Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, and Jews are not bloodthirsty psychotics.

And yesterday, more peaceful Muslims stormed yet more embassies, one of them being the German embassy in Sudan. The Muslims planted the Islamic flag at the site and set the building aflame.

It’s been assumed that they chose the German embassy because German Chancellor Angela Merkel, bless her heart, gave an award to the aforementioned Danish cartoonist who dared draw Mohammed.

We know who the problem is and it is most certainly not non-Muslims. If Christians were as “peaceful” as Muslims are, every church in America with a picture of Jesus would be a smoldering ash heap.

"Bette Midler wrote on her Twitter page, “Who are the idiots who made the video and put it on YouTube? When do we meet them? They should be charged with murder.”

When I read this paragraph I thought maybe this could be referring to the "Batman" movie.Many people were killed at this completely nonsensical movie.

Can we expect to see the FBI going in the middle of the night to homes of the producers of this film?

[Guest]

Was the Anti-Muslim Film Actually Produced by Muslims and Blamed on Christians?

by Philip Hodges

Islamic radicals stormed the U.S. Consulate in Libya and killed 4 people including Ambassador Stevens supposedly because of an anti-Muslim video on YouTube. But something just isn’t right about this video.

There’s still so much about the film, the producer and the rest who were involved that we just don’t know. The producer and director goes by the name Sam Bacile, but that’s not his real name. He won’t divulge his true identity. He claimed to be an Israeli-born Jewish filmmaker and California real estate agent, but Christian activist and film-promoter Steve Klein stated that he was neither Jewish nor Israeli. Israeli officials have no record of him and neither do California real estate agencies.

He apparently had a $5 million budget. So, why didn’t he put that money toward production of the film? Sure, he had to pay actors and actresses (one of the actresses got $500) and a crew, but what about equipment and post-production? I ask because it doesn’t look like very much time, effort or money was spent on those things at all.

In fact, I dare you to get through all 14 minutes of the film’s “trailer.” It’s got to be the worst “anti-Muslim” film ever. It is so bad, and the voice overdubs are so poor, it’s as if whoever put this together was trying desperately to make Christians look bad, not Muslims. Yes, the film involves a lot of statements about Muhammad being a “gay” bastard and portrays him as a bloodthirsty killer, polygamist and an overall buffoon. But all the Islamic and Muhammad references were overdubbed in “post-production,” and they sound like they could have been done by some 8th grader on Garage Band.

The film’s “trailer” begins in presumably present-day Egypt. But then, a few minutes in, it “non-sequitors” into the ancient Middle East somewhere where an obvious green screen is used to supply a desert, a tent and a few camels in the background. The audio sounded like it was done in a bathroom, and the voice overdubs were even worse. Who in their right mind would give $5 million to someone who obviously had no idea what he was doing and who refused to use decent engineers? Bacile claimed that he raised the money from “100 Jewish donors.”

The end result is that it mocks Christians’ opinion of Islam to the point of absurdity. Now, since this film has all of a sudden gotten publicity even though it was posted to YouTube back in July, the media will point to it as an example of what Christians believe, and that these “extremist” and “anti-Muslim” sentiments are to blame for the violence and murder overseas.

Another mysterious figure is Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who admitted to being the manager of the film’s production company. He too has aliases. Fox News reports:

Nakoula denied he directed the film and said he knew the self-described filmmaker, Sam Bacile. But the cell phone number that AP contacted Tuesday to reach the filmmaker who identified himself as Sam Bacile traced to the same address near Los Angeles where AP found Nakoula. Federal court papers said Nakoula’s aliases included Nicola Bacily, Erwin Salameh and others.

His aliases sound vaguely like “Sam Bacile” (“Salameh” – Sam; “Bacily” – Bacile). Do all these aliases refer to the same person? They might, but Nakoula denies posing as Bacile.

Nakoula also served 21 months in a federal prison and had to pay over $790,000 in restitution after pleading no contest in 2010 for federal bank fraud. Fox News continued:

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Leigh Williams said Nakoula set up fraudulent bank accounts using stolen identities and Social Security numbers, then checks from those accounts would be deposited into other bogus accounts from which Nakoula would withdraw money at ATM machines.

He claims to be a Coptic Christian.

When you look at the background of this bizarre film, you’ll find out that it was originally called “Desert Warriors,” and it was going to be about what life was like in Egypt 2,000 years ago.

Actors were hired to portray Egyptians, and the main character was named “George.” The other characters referred to him as “Master George.” But their dialogue was edited later to make is sound like it was about Muhammad. The actors involved are now denouncing the film because they say they had no idea that it was going to turn into an “anti-Muslim” video. One of the actresses said that initially, when she received a copy of the script, it had nothing to do with religion at all. The film apparently played once or twice at some run down LA theater last year, and it was dubbed a “historical Arabian desert adventure film.” A “Sam Bassiel” was listed as the producer.

This Bacile figure is now in hiding because he fears for his life from Muslim radicals. We still don’t know who he is, who Nakoula is, and why such an over-the-top poor job was done in producing the film, and why it was used as an excuse for Muslim violence in Libya and elsewhere.

I’m definitely anti-Muslim, or more appropriately pro-Christian. I’m all for exposing Islam as the violent, hateful, and bloodthirsty religion that it is. There are plenty of videos, films and documentaries on the subject of Islam and Muhammad that are actually well done that don’t get any attention at all by the media or the violent Muslims overseas. Yet they all chose simultaneously to react to this ludicrous excuse for an “educational film” that attempted to “reveal truths about Muhammad that are possibly not widely known,” as Florida pastor Terry Jones said. I’m not buying it. There has to be more to this than what the media have told us.

http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/09/was-.../#ixzz26fk71juN