Jump to content
ClubAdventist

Recommended Posts

Posted

Originally Posted By: JoeMo
Politics is part of the Unholy Trinity discussed in Rev. 16:13-14 (Politics, Economics, and Religion).

Not sure I agree with that, but I will say that politics is definitely unholy.

You are right pk. And that is why I have been known on occasion to avoid politics.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Posted

This article tends to promote a political position. Which is objectionable to me.

Why? More churches and pastors should get their congregrations involved so they really understand the issues and not vote depending on sound bites.

  • Moderators
Posted

Originally Posted By: Jeannieb43
This article tends to promote a political position. Which is objectionable to me.

Why? More churches and pastors should get their congregrations involved so they really understand the issues and not vote depending on sound bites.

And run the risk of losing church tax exemption? BIG no, no.

Posted

Some may want to reference the Spirit of Prophecy counsel on voting.

i.e. Do we really have a place supporting any of these men or women?

Posted

What is politics?

The term comes from two ancient Greek words:

Poli = Many

Tics = Blood-sucking Parasites

But seriously though...Spare a thought for those of us who live in Australia, where voting is compulsory.

We aren't having a federal election this year, but we have local council elections happening right now, and I'm looking at the two envelopes that just arrived a few days ago with postal voting papers for my husband and myself.

(Some local elections are held by post; most others are held on Saturdays. Either way, the Adventist thing to do is either a postal vote or pre-poll vote. There are a very small minority who do not vote - and are prepared to pay a penalty, see below - or my favorite, making an "informal" vote by defacing the ballot paper or otherwise making unofficial marks on it. Many of us remember those heady days of youth, having just turned 18 and being "eligible" to cast our compulsory vote, when we would add an extra square to the ballot paper and vote for Ronald McDonald, Krusty the Klown, Mr Bean or Adolf Hitler).

We forgot to vote one time because we were too busy and got fined $50 each. So it's better to return the ballot paper with "THIS IS A COMPLETE FARCE" written across it, than to flush a $50 note down the toilet, so to speak.

I'm going to vote for the candidate who promises to bring back our 6-monthly hard rubbish collections. It used to be like a garage sale that ate the whole neighborhood, with everybody walking and driving around recycling and scavenging each other's junk, until the party-poopers at Clown Hall decided it was an occupational health and safety hazard, or the garbage disposal contractors complained about losing work, or something. So now it's illegal.

My other strategy, because I believe in the total separation of church and state, is to vote for someone who is as diametrically opposite to me as possible in terms of religion. Needless to say, I am VERY comfortable with having an atheist/agnostic Prime Minister, for this reason.

(scans local council ballot paper description of candidates for someone who looks Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Baha'i or atheist)

AJ

www.asrc.org.au

(Asylum Seeker Resource Centre, Melbourne)

Helping over 2000 refugees & asylum seekers each month

IMSLP/Petrucci Music Library

The Public Domain Music Score Library - Free Sheet Music Downloads

Looking for classical sheet music? Try IMSLP first!

  • Administrators
Posted

Aldona, I did so enjoy reading your view of politics, seperation of church and state, etc.... thank you for putting it into proper perspective.

If your dreams are not big enough to scare you, they are not big enough for God

Posted

Originally Posted By: Jeannieb43
This article tends to promote a political position. Which is objectionable to me.

This brother could have done a better job disguising his republican leanings.

I assume you mean that the Bible principles identified in the article are tolerated more in the republican platform.

BE that as it may - I think the article applies to all nations and is generic in terms of Bible principles.

For example the article says "However, some societal actions are also described as abominations (Lev. 18)." -- leaving it up to the reader to read the chapter and decide for themselves.

Unless the argument is that Lev 18 was "written for or by Republicans in America" - the point is generic.

in Christ,

Bob

John 8:32 - The Truth will make you free

“The righteousness of Christ will not cover one cherished sin." COL 316.

Posted

Originally Posted By: olger
Very thought provoking.

Vote wisely but don't make any political comments about what the article says wisely may look like when looking to vote wisely in a political election??

Precisely.

"Please don't feed the drama queens.."

  • Moderators
Posted

I assume you mean that the Bible principles identified in the article are tolerated more in the republican platform.

Not at all.

There are Biblical principles that Republicans ignore.

The campaign against gay marriage but are silent on heterosexual divorce.

Abortion is murder but drone strikes are not.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

They (Republicans) campaign against gay marriage but are silent on heterosexual divorce.

Abortion is murder but drone strikes are not.

I have yet to see democrats debate "against Republicans" when it comes to divorce and drone strikes.

Rather it is this democrat President that is absolutely enthusiastic about drone strikes and no complaints at all from the democrat run senate and congress of his first two years in office nor from those same guys to this date.

in Christ,

Bob

John 8:32 - The Truth will make you free

“The righteousness of Christ will not cover one cherished sin." COL 316.

Posted

Just a reminder - this is not the political forum. Any mention of Republicans and Democrats will earn you 4 demerits.

May we be one so that the world may be won.
Christian from the cradle to the grave
I believe in Hematology.
 

Posted

They (Republicans) campaign against gay marriage but are silent on heterosexual divorce.

Abortion is murder but drone strikes are not.

It would be extremely difficult to campaign politically against divorce.Does that somehow mean (Republicans) are for divorce?

God has granted permission for divorce under certain circumstances.No where has God granted permission for gay marriage.Homosexual behavior is always explained as a abomination.

Military action is a far different scenario.Indiscriminate drone strikes just because we can is wrong and I think most of us think so.Yes,it seems to be a lot more of it the last couple of years.

Drones are a separate issue from abortion. There are abortions that are just plain murder and that can't be denied.

A baby often is aborted that would be viable outside the womb. Not for the life of the mother,those babies are given every chance for life following their early or forced birth.

Babies,referred to as a fetus outside the womb are left without even basic comfort care and left to die.

Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this.

Quotes by Susan Gottesman

  • Moderators
Posted

I have yet to see democrats debate "against Republicans" when it comes to divorce and drone strikes.

That's beside the point. What are the Biblical principles here. Surely, you should have a problem with the Republican stance on divorce and drone strikes, right?.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

  • Moderators
Posted

It would be extremely difficult to campaign politically against divorce.

Why is that?

Quote:
Military action is a far different scenario.Indiscriminate drone strikes just because we can is wrong and I think most of us think so.Yes,it seems to be a lot more of it the last couple of years.

Who does Drone strikes "because we can?" Absurd. The US military is going after targets. Sometimes they get them sometimes they don't. The point is that murdering innocent people is wrong under any circumstances, born or unborn. They GOP has taught people to believe that killing unborn children is wrong but killing children who are near a suspected terrorist is a fact of life. In the same way that gay marriage is wrong but multiple divorces is OK. A perversion of Biblical principles.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

Quote:
Why is that?

What role would you like to see any political side take in prohibiting divorce? Make it illegal? Force two people to live together? Make it a government role? Do you really believe that as long as it is not a political issue that means that they are in favor of indiscriminate divorce?

Is gay marriage to be legalized based on the divorce rate of straight couples? How does the divorce rate make void that God has forbidden a gay lifestyle and calls it an abomination ?

Quote:
Who does Drone strikes "because we can?" Absurd. The US military is going after targets. Sometimes they get them sometimes they don't. The point is that murdering innocent people is wrong under any circumstances' date=' born or unborn. They GOP has taught people to believe that killing unborn children is wrong but killing children who are near a suspected terrorist is a fact of life. In the same way that gay marriage is wrong but multiple divorces is OK. A perversion of Biblical principles.

[/quote']

Killing a 125 people because a suspected terrorist might be in the midst is using drones just because you can.

If I am against abortion,especially those that are aborted that could live with some supportive care,I first need to list everything else I am against,give a list of what I have done to care for neglected starving children? Decide if I don't speak out against another specific sin,then should remain silent on all?

There is nothing right about multiple divorces so please quit trying to imply that has been said by those that do not believe gay marriage should become law. Multiple divorce is a perversion of God's law.Please list those that have said multiple divorce is Okay.Then tell me what a political figure should do about a divorce of private citizens.Decide who is at fault and force the guilty to remain in the marriage?Outlaw divorce except for physical abuse? Allow divorce when one is a drug addict?

Gay partnerships/marriage is as susceptible to separation/divorce as a straight couple.That is not a reason to either deny gay marriage or condone it.

From what you have written it appears that because there are other sins in the world,gay marriage should be legalized and

abortions at any stage is acceptable.

Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this.

Quotes by Susan Gottesman

  • Members
Posted

Some may want to reference the Spirit of Prophecy counsel on voting.

i.e. Do we really have a place supporting any of these men or women?

Only if you can find an honest one. So yes I agree, we should not be supporting them.

phkrause

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
  • Moderators
Posted

What role would you like to see any political side take in prohibiting divorce? Make it illegal? Force two people to live together? Make it a government role? Do you really believe that as long as it is not a political issue that means that they are in favor of indiscriminate divorce?

The reason why these pols don't talk about divorce is because many of them have been divorced. It is that simple. If we are driven by biblical principle then who cares what the obstacles are.

Quote:
Killing a 125 people because a suspected terrorist might be in the midst is using drones just because you can.

Using the same reasoning the 6,000 civilians dead in the town of Falujah, Iraq was also because you can.

Quote:
Multiple divorce is a perversion of God's law.Please list those that have said multiple divorce is Okay.

Their silence speaks loudly. If you speak against gay marriage because you believe in the sanctity of marriage then you should speak equally strongly against divorce. Divorce is in fact the greater threat to marriage.

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

The reason why these pols don't talk about divorce is because many of them have been divorced. It is that simple. If we are driven by biblical principle then who cares what the obstacles are.

Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this.

Quotes by Susan Gottesman

  • Moderators
Posted

Ok.

I guess if GOP's start being concerned about divorce you'll being concerned. Our agenda should be driven by the Word of God not by our politics.

Quote:

No the war with Iraq was not just because we could.Civilians are one of the great tragedy's of war.They are in any war.

So 125 is becasue we can but 6,000 is just the cost of doing business. The 125 was still in a war or because now its a democratic president?

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

Ok.

I guess if GOP's start being concerned about divorce you'll being concerned. Our agenda should be driven by the Word of God not by our politics.

Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this.

Quotes by Susan Gottesman

  • Moderators
Posted

The drone strikes which I have a big problem with, are against terrorists.There have been drone strikes when the wanted individual may or may not be in the midst of many innocents,weddings/funerals.

During a active war there isn't any way to stop and weed out the innocents.

Drone strikes are carried out in war. The war on terror is a war. The reason why the US strike terrorists in Pakistan and Afghanistan is because there is a war on. Missions were called off in Iraq because of the presence of children. War is war!

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.

Einstein

Posted

Drone strikes are carried out in war. The war on terror is a war. The reason why the US strike terrorists in Pakistan and Afghanistan is because there is a war on. Missions were called off in Iraq because of the presence of children. War is war!

Yes drone strikes are carried out in war. Civilians will die in any war,But the war on terror?

Obama admin said the war on terror was over,he got Bin-Laden and Al-Quada is on it's heels.

Missions may have been called off in Iraq because of the presence of children,great,but maybe the children of Yemin weren't so special.Well over a 100 drone strikes and how many of these non-terrorists were killed and how many children.

Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this.

Quotes by Susan Gottesman

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...