Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Defense of Marriage Act: Is Federal G

[phkrause]

This is interesting as well.

http://religiousliberty.tv/defense-of-marriage-act-hearing-analysi.html

[olger]

Where is the historical, scientific, and experiential proof that same-sex marriage would serve the society into which it was incorporated?

Unfortunately, burning sulphur rained down on the evidence.

[phkrause]

Where is the historical, scientific, and experiential proof that same-sex marriage would serve the society into which it was incorporated?

Unfortunately, burning sulphur rained down on the evidence.

Obviously none needed, they know better than everyone else!

[ClubV12]

There is a lot of speculation and analyzing of which way the court may be leaning. But we have seen that often the analysts miss the outcome by a mile!

The Justices ask lots of questions, make lots of comments, I've given up trying to determine how they might rule based on that! They can change their mind very quickly as the draft of the opinion is reviewed, rewritten, reconsidered a number of times. They will meet several times in private, just them, no one else. Oh to be a fly on the wall for THOSE meetings!

Who knows? Thats my analysis on what they will rule! :)

[olger]

Yep. I wonder if it will be like last year, when in late June John Roberts made a watershed poor decision that will have consequences until the end of time.

[ClubV12]

Roberts is an excellent example of "you just don't know, how it's gonna go".

So, the excessively obese lady won't be singing anytime soon? :)