bump

[jasd]

Oh my! Is anyone else finding that much of those little kept journals of the leftistan media out there in Dogtown, USA are sooo-o-o, well, let’s say,

-- focussed?

Is that good? bad? or simply

-- disturbing…?

[Bravus]

Um, can you clarify a little more? Do you mean the MainStream Media™, particularly its newspaper wing, or do you mean something like blogs? I'm intrigued by the question (and yes, I might come back with a counter-question about the breadth and eclecticism of the rightistan media <img src="/ubbtreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />), but don't want to fly off into any unwarranted assumptions about what you're saying.

[jasd]

>>Do you mean the MainStream Media, particularly its newspaper wing,<<

Mostly, but ever intending that the Television and Motion Picture industry should not feel slighted.

>>…or do you mean something like blogs?<<

No…, blogs, on the face of it, were intentionally left out of any characterization (visited yours twice… thought it was well done and will, one day, with schnapps and almonds, spend some time there) – except, where by inference, some might feel them to be included under the eaves and gutters of the mainstream Media tent, so to speak …depending on whether “little” in the phrase “little kept” is read as harboring an entendre, I suppose.

Again, no, no blogs included (that’s for another day [/grinnin’] ) though I can see that my post may have reflected such an inclusion.

>>…the breadth and eclecticism of the rightistan media ),<< [ed.]

Uh-oh… you’re of the opinion that there is eclecticism to be found there? [/smilin’]

>>…but don't want to fly off into any unwarranted assumptions about what you're saying.<<

Oh, go on…, there is such assumin’ ongoin’ here'bouts anythehoo -- that it’s taken on the robes of ecclesiastica

[jasd]

bump