Members rudywoofs (Pam) Posted January 18, 2015 Members Posted January 18, 2015 This morning I came across this blog from the Junia Project on "feminization" and the church. I think the author stated well the actualities of the claim... http://juniaproject.com/say-church-feminine/ JANUARY 16, 2015 BY KATE WALLACE Pet Peeves We all have them. And some of us are better than others at hiding them. For me, pet peeves generally fall into two categories: low and high annoyance. My low-annoyance pet peeves include: Nail biting Misuse of the word “literally” to mean something figurative – “I literally died when I heard that!” Saying “I could care less” to mean “I couldn’t care less”. Really? You could care less – meaning you do care somewhat now? When people combine 2 & 3 above into one sentence – “Ya that’s what she said, and I could literally care less.” – ummmm what? When these come up, I can usually look past them (not always), smile, and continue with my day. But many of us also have one or two pet peeves that we cannot ignore – the kind that are just a little too annoying to let slide. The claim that the Church is “too feminine” falls into that category for me. The Church is “Too Feminine” Every few years or so this claim becomes popular in the Church, and you hear it all over – it’s on the radio, in the magazines, causally placed in sermons from the pulpit or in conversations with Christian leaders. This claim has come around again recently, from the Catholic camp, and it makes my skin crawl. It instantly hits my annoyance button for the same reason that the misuse of language irks me – it shows that we aren’t thinking things through before we say them. Cardinal Burke, former highest ranking US cardinal, claimed earlier this month that the “feminization” of the Church is to blame for the lack of male attendance. Apart from the priest, the sanctuary has become full of women. The activities in the parish and even the liturgy have been influenced by women and have become so feminine in many places that men do not want to get involved.” Despite how benign the claim may sound, it is actually very offensive. Instead of simply saying that there aren’t enough men in church, the blame is placed on women. The real problem, we are saying, is with the women – There are too many of them you see. They are taking over and now there’s no room for the men! This claim is also offensive because it sends the message that being feminine is something that should be avoided, or at least moderated. It also tends to claim that anything feminine – aka women – is a problem for the church. (I truly loved this response to Cardinal Burke’s words by Alexandra Petri.) The Facts Yes, this statement bothers me, because it shows how little we are actually evaluating the situation and because it is offensive, but most importantly it bothers me because it is completely false. The Barna Group has been studying Church trends over the last 20 years and they have found that women actually represent the biggest shift away from the Church. They also found that the gap between unchurched men and women is no longer a significant one. “It remains true that churchless people are somewhat more likely to be men than women, but the gap is not huge and has been steadily closing…the gap between men and women has plummeted from 20 points in 2003 to just 8 points currently.” And this is not just in protestant churches. Findings coming out of the Catholic Church do not look much different,according to the Association of Religion Data Archives. All of this makes me want to ask those who claim that the Church is “too feminine” what churches they are going to. Are men really walking into churches and becoming overwhelmed with female presence? The idea that the church is “too feminine” goes against the majority of my experiences in church. In fact, as I visited churches on three continents over the last 6 years of my life, I have noticed that the majority of those churches presented the same experience to me, and it doesn’t come close to being feminine. My Experience For those in the church family who have ears to hear, here is this sister’s experience in many (not all) churches: As I walk into church, I am welcomed by a man who hands me a bulletin. I am ushered to my seat by a man. I look through the bulletin in my hand and read the names of men on the elder board and men serving as pastors. I am welcomed by a man who gives the announcements. I stand and worship, led by a band of mostly men. We sing songs that are mostly written by men. I sit down and listen to a man preach a sermon and give illustrations from his own, male, life. He reads scripture from a Bible that was translated by men. This translation speaks primarily to men through its masculine pronouns. The sermon usually centers around a man in the Bible. This male pastor leads me in prayer to a God he calls father. I walk up to take communion from men. A man stands up and asks me to give money. Men walk up with baskets to collect it from me. I stand up and am led in worship one more time, by men. I walk out to the courtyard and eat the morning treats made by women. I drink the coffee prepared by women. Women may indeed make up the majority of people in the pews (for now), but they do not make up even half of the people who make decisions about church services or experience. If men really aren’t going to church, it doesn’t seem to be the fault of women. Perhaps the Church leaders who are making these claims should stop shaming the faithful, and start asking them for help. Do I care that men aren’t going to church? Of course I do! I also care that women are leaving the Church! We should be concerned about everyone in the Church and how we can better minister to and disciple them. Instead of playing the gender blame game, let’s use our critical thinking skills to better analyze the situation. Yes we need men in our pews. We also need women in our pulpits, on our elder boards, at the communion tables, on the worship teams, and in our denominational leadership. Quote Pam Meddle Not In the Affairs of Dragons; for You Are Crunchy and Taste Good with Ketchup. If we all sang the same note in the choir, there'd never be any harmony. Funny, isn't it, how we accept Grace for ourselves and demand justice for others?
Stan Posted January 18, 2015 Posted January 18, 2015 He says it is too feminine? Need to sit down with him over tea and get in touch with our feelings. Gail, Sojourner and rudywoofs (Pam) 3 Quote If you receive benefit to being here please help out with expenses. https://www.paypal.me/clubadventist Administrator of a few websites like https://adventistdating.com
Administrators Gail Posted January 18, 2015 Administrators Posted January 18, 2015 The church I went to yesterday was very manly... But like everything in at least North America it goes through phases. At one time someone decided there needed to be more emphasis on God's grace and acceptance to get away from legalism. Then churches needed to have different music. Then they got into the purpose-driven concept of worship and growing mega churches. More lately the emergent movement has been in the religious news. The idea that churches needed to change to appeal to men was another "fad" that hit us. Some trends are longer lived than others but like worldly ones they come and go. rudywoofs (Pam) and Naomi 2 Quote Isaiah 32:17 And the work of righteousness shall be peace; and the effect of righteousness quietness and assurance for ever.
Sojourner Posted January 18, 2015 Posted January 18, 2015 It is my view that many churches are struggling to remain relevant in society to both men and women. I don’t hold with the claim that churches are being “feminized”, yet my background is from the Salvation Army before joining the SDA who had several female “Generals” since the organization was founded along with female Officers (Pastors) also from the time it was begun. So I am used to the idea and it’s a non runner for me. I don’t see a great deal of difference with the SDA here in Australia as there are female pastors, elders and leadership here also. The first question I would ask someone that wants to make the claim that their church is being feminized is if their church has a men’s group and do they attend and support it? My experience is that over 90% of churches I have come across do not have a men’s ministry group that meets on a regular basis. Some churches put on a men’s breakfast from time to time but that is about it. My observation is that churches that put effort into having a thriving men’s ministry tend to have good numbers of men, including new Christians attending their church services also. My experience is that men’s ministry groups work with multiple focuses. Yes we meet for Bible Study and Prayer, We also like to do recreational things together like 10 pin bowling or fishing trips. A third popular activity is ministry in working together in manual labour to help people at the church with their gardening or to build things to do with church infrastructure or missions work. Many of us know a trade and are happy to work in that in our spare time as a part of the group to minister to the body of Christ with the gifts that G-d has given us. If a church does not have this outlet and has no men’s ministry at all, then is it really any surprise that they either attend elsewhere or lose interest over time in church? Who was it that said “as iron sharpens iron one man sharpens another”.. Does your church fellowship have a men’s ministry? Gail 1 Quote
Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted January 18, 2015 Moderators Posted January 18, 2015 My observation is that all to often "men's groups" are often considered not to be revelant to the interests of the men in the congregation. IOW, they are considered not to be needed. Stan 1 Quote Gregory
CoAspen Posted January 18, 2015 Posted January 18, 2015 Wondering where this 'fad' will end and when. I am waiting, still, for a good explanation of why men would leave the church if 'feminization' were true. Why would that be an excuse? With men being the predominant feature of the church, currently, why have not women left in large numbers? Have women been seen as too passive to care? My personal belief, it is the fear of losing the male dominance of the past that brings out all these ridiculous ideas, a last gasp effort to hang on to the past. Maybe God has gotten tired of the delay by men and said I am calling everyone, with a loud voice, to finish the work. No longer will womens voices be drowned out by religious maneuvering because Gods voice is louder. I would suggest we start listening that voice.......in everything. phkrause, Tom Wetmore and JoeMo 3 Quote
CoAspen Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 I'm thinking that the war on women is something that certain individuals/organizations are not going to give up on for awhile. The posting and reposting of articles/opinion blogs/etc, seem to be continuing on these forums. Hats off to the women though, they take it all in stride....as they have been doing for years!! phkrause and JoeMo 2 Quote
Administrators Tom Wetmore Posted January 19, 2015 Administrators Posted January 19, 2015 Years, decades, centuries, millennia in fact... The war on women began in the Garden of Eden when Adam blamed Eve for his own disobedience. "That woman you gave to me...." Sin does that... God said so. CoAspen and JoeMo 2 Quote "Absurdity reigns and confusion makes it look good." "Sinless perfection is such a shallow goal." "I love God only as much as the person I love the least." *Forgiveness is always good news. And that is the gospel truth. (And finally, the ideas expressed above are solely my person views and not that of any organization with which I am associated.)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.