Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted March 9, 2015 Moderators Posted March 9, 2015 The SDA Church has filed so-called "friend of the court" brief(s) in a case presently before the U.S. Supreme Court. http://www.adventistreview.org/church-news/story2370-church-fears-same-sex-marriage-ruling-may-stifle-religious-freedom http://www.adventistreview.org/news-commentary The two above articles, taken together represent a balanced view of what the Church has done and the above two articles should be read by all. I applaud the church for stating, in the 1st article, that the case does not represent a real threat that clergy would be required to perform homosexual weddings. In my opinion, that issue is simply a "red Herring" that has no reasonable basis in either case or statute law. In that 1st article, the church has laid out other concerns as to how their "religious liberty" may be affected by potential rulings of the Court. I agree with the article that such may be the result in some cases, perhaps not all. While I therefore have some agreement, I have some thinking that some of the issues may not actually religious rights that are protected by the Constitution and I have questions as to whether or not they should be so protected. I believe that the 2nd article is of value in its statement as to why the Church had not taken a legal position on some aspects of the issue. Read. They are of value. Vitezhish 1 Quote Gregory
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.