Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted December 10, 2015 Moderators Posted December 10, 2015 The SDA Church in the United States is encouraging the hire of female clergy. It has a number of aspects, of which I am not fully aware. However, as one part, Congregations that hire new female interns and pledge to pay 1/3 of her salary will have higher levels of the denomination pay the additional 2/3s. This is a breakthrough which goes beyond what has been done in the past. NOTE: I am personally aware of one situation where this is in place and is being administratively processed as I write. However, it is possible that in your local area this may not be done in exactly the same way in which it is being done in the situation of which I am aware. Quote Gregory
Members rudywoofs (Pam) Posted December 10, 2015 Members Posted December 10, 2015 that's not a "breakthrough".... that is discrimination against male interns. Each person should be hired on the basis of their qualifications, not their gender. Ponying up money against male interns in favor of female interns is wrong...very wrong. In my opinion. Quote Pam Meddle Not In the Affairs of Dragons; for You Are Crunchy and Taste Good with Ketchup. If we all sang the same note in the choir, there'd never be any harmony. Funny, isn't it, how we accept Grace for ourselves and demand justice for others?
Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted December 10, 2015 Author Moderators Posted December 10, 2015 Pam, the funding for interns in general remains the same. Females can still be hired in a competitive process with male interns. This process opens up the possibility for additional interns to be hired if they are female. It does not reduce the number of males who can be hired. I strongly suspect that this program may be tailored to meet local conditions. I strongly believe that it is NOT a one-size fits all. As I look at the specific situation of which I am aware, it has been tailored, I believe, in a manner that will allow the local Conference to hire one additional Intern who may be either male for female in a selection that considers the best qualified. As I understand both the program in general and the specific case that I reference, additional funding has been provided. Quote Gregory
Members rudywoofs (Pam) Posted December 10, 2015 Members Posted December 10, 2015 16 minutes ago, Gregory Matthews said: This process opens up the possibility for additional interns to be hired if they are female. It does not reduce the number of males who can be hired. Are you saying additional interns can also be hired if they are male, as well as hiring females? If additional interns can be hired only if they are female *is* discriminatory against males. Quote Pam Meddle Not In the Affairs of Dragons; for You Are Crunchy and Taste Good with Ketchup. If we all sang the same note in the choir, there'd never be any harmony. Funny, isn't it, how we accept Grace for ourselves and demand justice for others?
Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted December 10, 2015 Author Moderators Posted December 10, 2015 (edited) I am saying this: 1) I strongly suspect that there will be some local differences in this program. 2) There is a standard program for hiring interns, who may be either male or female. No preference is given here. Simply put, the person hired will be the person best qualified to meet the local needs. This program will continue as it has been in the past. Under this program there is no reduction for males who are hired, as such. The most qualified person will be hired, regardless of their gender, that meets local needs. Both males and females may be hired. 3) This program provides additional funding for the hiring of female interns. Yes, it is limited to females on the basis that females have been discriminated against in the past, which is true. Call this discrimination, if you wish. The bottom line is that it is an attempt to correct the past without providing an adverse effect on males. 4) Because this program is additional funding, as in the specific situation I reference, the Conference does not lose an Intern slot, so to speak. Now the Conference can hire two people for the price of one. Those two people may be one male and one female, or it may be two females. What it cannot be is to hire two males. Edited December 10, 2015 by Gregory Matthews Quote Gregory
Members rudywoofs (Pam) Posted December 10, 2015 Members Posted December 10, 2015 discrimination in the past is not a reason to discriminate in the present [in my opinion — which means absolutely nothing to the church hierarchy] ... D. Allan 1 Quote Pam Meddle Not In the Affairs of Dragons; for You Are Crunchy and Taste Good with Ketchup. If we all sang the same note in the choir, there'd never be any harmony. Funny, isn't it, how we accept Grace for ourselves and demand justice for others?
Woody Posted January 23, 2016 Posted January 23, 2016 I suppose one solution would be to fire ALL pastors and then hire the pastoral position without regard to gender. However .... that is kind of extreme. I like the idea you are presenting. It sounds like a good first step approach. Pray it will be successful. Quote May we be one so that the world may be won. Christian from the cradle to the grave I believe in Hematology.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.