The "right to go" – James Standish proposes solution to bathroom wars

[Stan]

The war over who gets to use which public restroom has become a major topic of debate in recent months. James Standish, an American lawyer currently living in Australia and the former executive director of the US Commission on Freedom of Religion or Belief recently proposed a common-sense solution in an article in the Washington Examiner.

The post The "right to go" – James Standish proposes solution to bathroom wars appeared first on ReligiousLiberty.TV - Celebrating Liberty of Conscience.

View the full article

[bonnie]

The common sense obvious solution has been rejected by those pushing for "transgenders to use whatever facility they choose

[Aliensanctuary]

Girls and women could be immortalized on the internet when they're photographed while sitting on the toilet by men holding phones over or under the stalls. Not to worry, it's already happened.

Maybe Mr. Obama's two daughters being photographed while peeing or showering with LGBT's will demonstrate the president's commitment to men and women relieving themselves together or taking showers together in shared bathrooms and locker rooms.

[Gregory Matthews]

The conduct described below is already illegal and people are prosecuted for such.  The issue of who uses a public restroom is not going to change anything. 
The prosecution of those who do such will continue.

 

Girls and women could be immortalized on the internet when they're photographed while sitting on the toilet by men holding phones over or under the stalls. Not to worry, it's already happened.

[phkrause]

3 hours ago, Gregory Matthews said:

The conduct described below is already illegal and people are prosecuted for such.  The issue of who uses a public restroom is not going to change anything. 
The prosecution of those who do such will continue.

Quote

Girls and women could be immortalized on the internet when they're photographed while sitting on the toilet by men holding phones over or under the stalls. Not to worry, it's already happened.

Exactly!!

[bonnie]

45 minutes ago, phkrause said:

Exactly!!

So what is the problem with  unisex facilities? Men that don't have an issue with female members of their families sharing 

 locker rooms/dressing rooms with men, or men using a urinal  are perfectly free to do so.Women that are comfortable showering in a locker room with men or sharing a dressing room with the opposite sex can do so without recrimination.

No one is discriminated against or singled out. 

[Aliensanctuary]

Unisex facilities are unacceptable to the LGBT Nazis. They want to trample our rights to personal privacy in order to promote their agenda and attack those with Christian principles.

[phkrause]

21 hours ago, bonnie said:

So what is the problem with  unisex facilities?

Nothing! They have had men and women sharing bathrooms, at least at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, for many years. I believe there are other College/Universities also!!

[bonnie]

34 minutes ago, phkrause said:

Nothing! They have had men and women sharing bathrooms, at least at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, for many years. I believe there are other College/Universities also!!

Do they have a choice as to what restrooms to use? Do they also share dressing rooms and locker rooms with the opposite sex?

The last time I was in a dressing room trying on clothing it would have been very uncomfortable for the women in various stages of undress to be doing so with a man present.  Using a unisex facility should be a matter of choice,going in you know you may be sharing with the opposite sex something that  most women would rather not.

As it seems here so many are either in favor or don't have strong objections why not have the SDA.org get ahead of the curve and have only gender neutral facilities in their churches and schools? Isn't it just a matter of society changing and we need to change with it?

 

[bonnie]

My grandson will be going to camp again this year. Maybe they should have gender neutral showers etc. We don't want to discriminate and strife to be all inclusive, so why not?