What Does the Nuclear Deal With Iran Mean?

[phkrause]

This morning, Democrats in the U.S. Senate announced that they have the 34 votes necessary to uphold the President's expected veto if Congress, as expected, passes a resolution disapproving the Obama administration's deal with Iran. The international agreement is supposed to result in a dismantling of the Iranian nuclear program in return for lifting of sanctions, but given the Iranian leadership's ongoing theme of "death to America" and "death to Israel" the deal certainly does not signify a sense of international friendship. The deal involves Iran, the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and China and has been endorsed by the U.N. Security Council.

http://religiousliberty.tv/what-does-the-nuclear-deal-with-iran-mean.html

[Gregory Matthews]

This morning. . .  September 2, 2015.

 

[JoeMo]

I don't mean to sound "liberal", but what business do we have of preventing Iran (or North Korea, for that matter) from building nuclear weapons?  Lots of countries have nuclear weapons; and I wouldn't doubt that terrorist organizations have a few as well.  What's to prevent a despotic or insane world leader of a current nuclear power from threatening the world like North Korea or Iran?