Moderators Gregory Matthews Posted March 23, 2019 Moderators Posted March 23, 2019 One issue that divides the SDA denomination today is the issue as to whether the individual congregation should be a hospital for people who are on a spiritual journey, or a sanctuary for sinners. The following is a brief abstraction from a larger article that commented on this--GM. NOTE: The specific wording below, to some extent (not totally) will be mine--GM. * A healthy congregation will attract sinners who are spiritually sick. * That healthy congregation will: 1) Love people more than doctrine, and it will be a safe place for people who are spiritually ill to come and experience the love of God. 2) Strive to create an atmosphere of grace and acceptance. It will be a place where the spiritually ill can see that God loves them with no strings attached. 3) It takes time to develop love. People grow in truth, understanding and love for God. It does not happen all at once. Elements of sin may remain for some time before being removed. The above has been abstracted from: Lee Dart, "Church Museum or Hospital?" Outlook March 2019, pages 6 & 7 Quote Gregory
Lone Ranger Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Wanderer said: why oh why do we like our lists so much? Anyone outside the list is usually anathema. I'm not sure the making of a list was the main intent of the post. Do you have a comment on the nature of a healthy church? IMO, the church is a hospital for sinners, since we are all sinners whether LGBT+++ or control freaks or bullies or liars or pimps or whores or whatever. At the same time it should ALSO be a safe refuge FOR the sinner. JoeMo 1 Quote
Administrators Gail Posted March 23, 2019 Administrators Posted March 23, 2019 It should be a safe refuge for everyone. That complicates the picture as that will involve setting healthy boundaries JoeMo 1 Quote Isaiah 32:17 And the work of righteousness shall be peace; and the effect of righteousness quietness and assurance for ever.
JoeMo Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 4 hours ago, Gail said: It should be a safe refuge for everyone. That complicates the picture as that will involve setting healthy boundaries ... and that boundary line may get a little blurry at times. It is certainly messy. But just like a messy barn is a sign of an active farm, maybe a messy church is a sign of a busy church. Just an analogy, not a personal doctrine. phkrause and Lone Ranger 2 Quote
dgrimm60 Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 GREGORY well a true healthy church as well as a true healthy Christian must have the HOLY SPIRIT leading === with out this influence we cah discuss what should we do and what the goal of the church is=== there is a statement that when the members of this church truly represent CHSIT character then the HOLY SPIRIT will lead many people in to the truth and church dgrimm60 Quote
Administrators debbym Posted March 24, 2019 Administrators Posted March 24, 2019 9 hours ago, Gregory Matthews said: One issue that divides the SDA denomination today is the issue as to whether the individual congregation should be a hospital for people who are on a spiritual journey, or a sanctuary for sinners. The following is a brief abstraction from a larger article that commented on this--GM. Why does a healthy church have to be one or the other... these should not be mutually exclusive. What is a sanctuary for sinners safe from? Is it not a safe place where a spiritual journey can take place? What is a spiritual journey but an experience where one can move through changes that could not have happened outside a spiritually safe place? A church should not be a place where people can endlessly study and learn and learn and not ever grow, nor should it be a place where sinners can come and be comfortable in endlessly continuing in sin and not experience changes in their life. i admit i have not read the article. phkrause 1 Quote deb Love awakens love. Let God be true and every man a liar.
Lone Ranger Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 9 hours ago, The Wanderer said: Who actually says that "church" has to be like this? Where did that come from? Is it even humanly possible to attain unto? HOW does scripture define "Church?" I said that and I stand by my statement. Did you miss the "IMO?" It means "In My OPIONION." Maybe dial back the aggression a bit. JoeMo 1 Quote
Members phkrause Posted March 24, 2019 Members Posted March 24, 2019 19 hours ago, debbym said: Why does a healthy church have to be one or the other... these should not be mutually exclusive. What is a sanctuary for sinners safe from? Is it not a safe place where a spiritual journey can take place? What is a spiritual journey but an experience where one can move through changes that could not have happened outside a spiritually safe place? A church should not be a place where people can endlessly study and learn and learn and not ever grow, nor should it be a place where sinners can come and be comfortable in endlessly continuing in sin and not experience changes in their life. i admit i have not read the article. Excellent points debbym!! Quote phkrause When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Lone Ranger Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 11 minutes ago, The Wanderer said: so the labelers and dissers can go find their lunch somewhere else. As you wish. I shall do just that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.