bevin Posted June 27, 2006 Posted June 27, 2006 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060627/ap_on_go_co/delay_s_replacement ROFLOL What dumb law requires parties to choose the candidates so far in advance DeLay is, of course, doing his damnedest not to obey the law, while not actually breaking it. Should just get his buddy George to rule that the law doesn't apply to dishonest candidates. /Bevin Quote
Dr. Shane Posted June 27, 2006 Posted June 27, 2006 </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr /> Democrats want to block any other Republican from being listed on the ballot for the suburban Houston district, where Democratic former Rep. Nick Lampson is running. <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> One has to wonder why the Democrats are argueing in court about this. Delay has said he isn't going to seek re-election. Should the people in his district have the choice between a Republican and a Democrat? It seems to me that the Democrats just want to run unopposed in a Republican-leaning district. In essance, they want to deny the electorate a choice. That seems to be bad politics to me. Quote Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com Author of Peculiar Christianity
bevin Posted June 28, 2006 Author Posted June 28, 2006 I agree that voters should have a choice, hence I think that the law that stops the choice is stupid, however it is the law, and politicians (regardless of what GWB says) should obey the law. /Bevin Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.