Are offshore wind farms responsible for recent whale deaths?

[bonnie]

 

February 11, 2023

Are offshore wind farms responsible for recent whale deaths?

By Chris Talgo

 

 

When I was a kid, I remember environmentalists being utterly obsessed with "saving the whales."  So where are all these whale-loving environmentalists when you really need them?

Over the past two months, eight whales have washed ashore across New Jersey and New York beaches.  Coincidentally or not, the major uptick in deaths of these majestic mammals also happens to be occurring as construction has begun for Empire Wind, a massive offshore wind farm located in the very same waters.

Because of the unmistakable connection between the whale deaths and the opening phases of construction for the wind farm, several New Jersey beachfront mayors have called for an "immediate moratorium" on the offshore wind development project.

"While we are not opposed to clean energy, we are concerned about the impacts these (offshore wind) projects may already be having on our environment," the mayors said.

In truth, they have every right to be concerned about the detrimental impact that underwater seabed mapping, soil borings, and other turbine construction activities may be inflicting on whales and other marine life in the area.

According to Cindy Zipf, executive director of Clean Ocean Action, "t is plausible to question whether offshore wind pre-construction activities, which are happening concurrently in this region, are a contributing factor in these deaths."

She added that this many whale deaths in this short a time span is "unprecedented" and notes that preconstruction for the Empire Wind project has led to substantially "more ships and vessels in the area, which increase potential ship strikes, and sonar can deafen or disorient whales, leading them into the path of oncoming vessels

In other words, drilling massive holes into the sea floor to erect the mammoth-sized wind turbines could be wreaking havoc on a species that uses sound to navigate the waters, find mates, and hunt for food.

In fact, even the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) admits that "ocean noise from human activity can alter whale behavior, stress the animals, and in some cases, cause disorientation or hearing loss."  However, NOAA also claims that "there is no evidence that sonar and noise created from pre-construction offshore wind activity is harming the whales."

That sure sounds fishy.

Perhaps most interesting about this whole affair is that it has created quite a rift among several environmental groups that typically sing from the same song sheet.  For instance, in one corner, Clean Water Action, Environment New Jersey, the Sierra Club, New Jersey Audubon, NY/NJ Baykeeper, and the New Jersey League of Conservation Voters strongly support the project despite the surge in whale deaths.

As Allison McLeod, policy director at the New Jersey League of Conservation Voters, recently said, "While I am deeply concerned with the recent whale strandings, I also know we must base our decision making on science and data, not emotions or assumptions."  She added, "It is therefore irresponsible to assign blame to offshore wind energy development without supporting evidence."

In the other corner, environmental groups like Clean Ocean Action and Save the Whales staunchly oppose the project.  In December 2021, Save the Whales, along with nine other organizations, sent a letter to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, noting, "There is reason for grave concern" because Empire Wind will use "equipment [that] will emit sounds of the same sound frequencies as the calls of the North American Right Whales."

The letter also documents that "BOEM, under Biden-Harris Administration, continues to decline to make an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prior to lease sale of ocean areas, even knowing that such lease sales, with 100% certainty, will result in sea floor exploration/SAP activities requiring ensonification, and knowing that based on the sound frequency at which NARW communicate, adverse effects on the remaining NARW population of such sound-producing site-characterization activities are highly likely."

Although it is too soon to know with certainty that the sudden increase in whale deaths along the New Jersey and New York shore lines is 100 percent due to the opening phases of construction of the Empire Wind project, there is reason for concern.  And considering that most environmental groups nowadays are hypersensitive when any animal or habitat could be damaged by a new construction venture, it does seem strange that so many environmental groups, politicians, and federal government agencies could not care less about the potential catastrophe that a massive wind farm could impose on whales and countless other forms of sea life.

Chris Talgo (ctalgo@heartland.org) is editorial director at The Heartland Institute.

 

[phkrause]

Whales caught in wind power debate

Climate advocates say reports of deaths are being exploited

Elizabeth Weise and Dinah Voyles Pulver

USA TODAY

Efforts to stop wind turbines off the Atlantic coast have a new mascot: the whale.

A dozen New Jersey beach town mayors and several other groups now argue offshore wind power activity could be the cause of recent whale deaths and wind projects must be stopped while scientists investigate.

But those most vocal about their concern have been silent in recent years as whale strandings surged along the East Coast. Wind energy supporters and whale advocates say these organizations and politicians appear to be using whales as pawns.

A Jan. 30 letter signed by 12 New Jersey mayors and a congressman, Chris Smith, R-New Jersey, called for a moratorium on all offshore wind activity. Conservation advocates say the letter spreads speculation when scientists aren't convinced whale deaths and offshore wind projects are connected – and there's good reason to believe they are not.

Whales and wind emerged in the headlines in January after a news conference Jan. 9 by two groups, Clean Ocean Action and Protect Our Coast New Jersey. They blamed the “unprecedented” discovery of six dead whales along New Jersey and New York coasts on early-stage geotechnical surveys mapping the sea floor for wind farms.

See WHALES, Page 4A

Continued from Page 1A

They advanced a festering concern that sound beams used in such surveys could harm whales. Conservation groups and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management generally believe that's nonsense, in part because the type of sound used for wind turbine placement is much weaker than the stronger signals regularly used for other purposes such as oil and gas exploration.

Then the mayors' letter made national news with its call for a moratorium on all offshore wind activity until federal and state agencies determine there's no connection to a series of whale deaths.

The cause has also been taken up by Fox News personality Tucker Carlson, who has aired a series of segments in which he called wind turbines DDT for whales.

A 'convenient' argument

Longtime whale advocacy groups aren't buying it.

“It's just a cynical disinformation campaign,” said Greenpeace oceans director John Hocevar.

“It doesn't seem to worry them that it's not based in any kind of evidence.”

Scientists who study whale strandings say there's no known link between wind turbines and whale deaths, although they continue to investigate what role, if any, wind development has in whale deaths.

So far, evidence for a link is little more than speculation.

Experts point to the United Kingdom, which has 2,652 offshore wind turbines and where experts say autopsies have not found a connection between dead whales on their shores and the turbines off them.

Gib Brogan, a campaign director with Oceana, an international ocean advocacy group, said those opposed to wind power are using a spate of whale deaths in the area as an opportunity.

“It seems that the connection between the whale strandings and wind activities is a convenient line of opposition to development of offshore wind in the mid-Atlantic,” he said.

Of the 12 mayors who signed the letter, nine are Republican and one is a Democrat. In two towns, elections by law are nonpartisan. All represent small Jersey Shore beach towns.

A USA TODAY review of public statements found at least two of the mayors had spoken critically of offshore wind, a key part of the nation's renewable energy plan with a goal of producing enough electricity to power 10 million homes by decade's end.

“We've been 100% against this project from Day One,” Joe Mancini, mayor of Long Beach Township, said of the several wind farms in the proposal and research stage off the New Jersey shore.

Mancini's concerns are numerous: He says the proposed wind farms will destroy fishing and hurt tourism. The turbines are unsightly and the energy they produce is too expensive, he claims. “I don't care how far out they put them,” he said.

Instead, he supports nuclear power as the solution to creating carbon-neutral energy.

In the borough of Deal, Mayor Sam Cohen signed the letter, but when contacted by USA TODAY, he expressed concern over possible dangers to birds. “I have no idea how these wind turbines affect whales, but I would be interested to see a study on how these turbines affect fish and wildlife,” Cohen told USA TODAY.

Don Cabrera, a signer and mayor of the borough of Wildwood Crest, said he's opposed to “tampering with our ecosystem and ocean floor and possibly harming marine and other life.” He believes sustainable energy should come from land-based wind turbines and solar farms.

He's also not convinced the turbines, which he says would harm his town, won't be visible from land.

Rep. Smith, who has supported wind power, introduced a bill in 2019 to ban the use of seismic air guns, primarily by oil and gas companies. The measure aims to protect the endangered North Atlantic right whale and other marine life.

He has also supported a ban on offshore oil drilling.

But a USA TODAY review of news coverage of the mayors found no history of public concern for whale deaths, despite high rates of strandings dating back to 2017.

That year, 78 whales died along the Atlantic coast of the U.S. and Canada and 59 in 2018, 2019 and 2020, NOAA data shows.

“I don't know what to make of it that these people and these organizations that have not had a long-standing interest in whale conservation are becoming vocal opponents of offshore wind using whales as their vehicle,” Brogan said.

“Groups opposed to clean energy projects spread baseless misinformation that has been debunked by scientists and experts,” said JC Sandberg, chief advocacy officer with the American Clean Power Association, a renewable energy trade group.

“We have always worked alongside the environmental community to protect marine life and follow rigorous standards when developing projects. The recent whale strandings are tragic, but there is no evidence that these incidents have anything to do with offshore wind activity.”

The dispute has made for strange bedfellows.

The Jan. 9 news conference featured Clean Action Ocean, a 39-year-old group founded to fight beach dumping, as well as Protect Our Coast New Jersey. Founded in 2021, that group's money is managed by the Caesar Rodney Institute, which has received funding from the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers.

Conservative organizations or oil and gas interests appear to be using whales as pawns in efforts to undermine offshore wind projects, said Leah Stokes, a professor of political science at the University of Santa Barbara.

The tactic has been used to fight the land-based wind installations, the Inflation Reduction Act and now offshore wind power, said Stokes, whose book “Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States” researched anti-wind-power networks.

“They're taking those legitimate environmental concerns and trying to manipulate the conversation by using topics that matter to the environmental movement,” she said.

The same tactic is used when those opposed to wind energy focused on bird deaths, which isn't their actual concern, she said.

“Folks may have other reasons they don't like turbines, such as home prices or their own financial interests, but they'll mask it in arguing it's about protecting bird species,” she said.

'Too soon to speculate'

The East Coast is in the midst of a seven-year whale die-off that caused the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to declare an Unusual Mortality Event – an in-depth scientific investigation – for humpbacks in 2016. Two other unusual mortality investigations for whales began in 2017, one for minke whales and one for North Atlantic right whales.

Since Dec. 1, seven dead humpback whales and one sperm whale have been seen along the New Jersey shore, and eight other humpbacks and two North Atlantic right whales washed up along the coast between New York and North Carolina.

Both a humpback that washed ashore in Manasquan, New Jersey, on Monday and a right whale found dead on Virginia Beach on Sunday showed internal evidence of vessel strikes, NOAA said. At least three of the January whale deaths have been attributed to vessel strikes.

It's not clear this is an outsized number compared with past years.

“It is too soon to speculate about this year being higher than any others,” said NOAA spokeswoman Allison Ferreira.

Greenpeace's Hocevar isn't concerned.

“There's no evidence that we've seen implicating wind turbines and the deaths of whales on the East Coast,” he said.

So far, the United States has only two in operation, with a total of just seven turbines. Another two are in the construction stage, one off New York and one off Massachusetts.

Longer-term, 10 projects are in the environmental review process, meaning it will be years before construction can begin.

“While the climate deniers and the right-wing pundits are tilting at windmills,” Hocevar said, “most of us are focused on the real threats to whales: climate change, entanglement with fishing gear, ship strikes and plastic pollution.”

“It's just a cynical disinformation campaign. It doesn't seem to worry them that it's not based in any kind of evidence.”

John Hocevar

Greenpeace oceans director

[phkrause]

Wind and whales: ‘No evidence’ links projects to deaths

The U.S. offshore wind power industry is in its infancy, with just a handful of turbines installed along the Atlantic coast.

https://floridaphoenix.com/2023/03/06/wind-and-whales-no-evidence-links-projects-to-deaths/?