BREAKING – The Witness on Trial: Why the Prosecution of Don Lemon Faces a Steep Constitutional Climb

[Stan]

The arrest of Don Lemon on January 29, 2026, represents a significant moment where the boundaries of the First Amendment are being tested by a determined executive branch. While Attorney […]

The post BREAKING – The Witness on Trial: Why the Prosecution of Don Lemon Faces a Steep Constitutional Climb appeared first on ReligiousLiberty.TV.

View the full article

[Joe Knapp]

Quote

While Attorney General Pam Bondi has frames the arrest as a necessary step to protect religious practitioners from “coordinated attacks,” the legal architecture supporting this case appears increasingly fragile upon closer inspection.

The primary vulnerability of the government’s case lies in its previous failure to clear the “probable cause” hurdle in the judicial system. Both Federal Magistrate Judge Douglas Micko and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals initially refused to sign arrest warrants for Lemon. Judge Micko’s public assessment was blunt, stating there was “no evidence” of criminal behavior and that Lemon was acting in his capacity as a journalist documenting a newsworthy event. This judicial skepticism creates a high mountain for the prosecution to climb, as they must now prove that the exact same evidence, which a judge already found insufficient, somehow constitutes a federal conspiracy.

I have seen it reported that Mr Lemon gave them advice on how to do something.  If that is true, he crossed the line. No different from a YouTube blogger.  You can report, but you cannot participate. That is the line in the sand. 

 

Note: This does not constitute legal advice.