Jump to content
ClubAdventist

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted

Interesting that your mind leaps to compulsion when I said and meant nothing of the sort. My intention was to inform people so they can make their own choices, not take their choices away.

Truth is important

Posted

 

Interesting that your mind leaps to compulsion when I said and meant nothing of the sort. My intention was to inform people so they 

 

Actually that isn't quite what you said.

Many feel the same about the gospel of the news for you and others,Huffington Post,Salon and Media Matters.I don't think I have read here that you should avoid reading those at all costs.

 

Everything you do is based on the choices you make. It's not your parents, your past relationships, your job, the economy, the weather, an argument, or your age that is to blame. You and only you are responsible for every decision and choice you make, period ... ... Wish more people would realize this.

Quotes by Susan Gottesman

  • Moderators
Posted (edited)

I do avoid citing the HuffPost at all costs. I cite Salon while usually noting that I'm doing so and  that I know it's a site with a particular perspective. Pretty sure I've never cited Media Matters. 

I'm much more likely to cite Google Scholar or a paper in an academic journal, or The Economist, The Guardian or The Sydney Morning Herald.

I'm completely happy for people to make their own judgements about any source I use. Just as I made the judgement that "The Daily Mail should be avoided at all costs" ... a comment that included the hidden assumption "if you care at all about whether or not something is true". That paper publishes what is interesting, not what is true. Other sources, of course, do the same, but that one is particularly prone to publishing stories that turn out, on the quickest and shallowest investigation, to be wholly false.

By all means continue to use it as a source, if you're comfortable with that.

Edited by Bravus

Truth is important

Posted

- who has the "facts"?  The U.S. - based news services are reporting different things than the independent and foreign-based news.  Fox and CNN even report different viewpoints. Whose "facts" are we gonna believe?

In this day and age, "facts" seem to by a matter of personal preference.  To many, it is a "fact" that Obama is a Muslim; to others it is not a fact.  To many, it is a "fact "that the U.S must exploit its new-found energy wealth to save the country and the world; to others, it is a "fact" that doing so will so aggrevate climate change to the point that we will be doomed.  To many, Jesus being the author and finisher of our faith is a "fact"; to others, its mythology.

Which "facts" do you accept?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...