I think the issue really about what people consider "real", and there's no clear distinction in our "mind experience" as to what we consider real and what we consider not real.
Hence, a lot of religions actually bank on making no distinction between a reality and a concept of reality.
God, the way 99% of the people claim to experience God, exists entirely in people's imagination. I'm not saying whether God really exists or not, but that's how people tend to experience God. They read the Bible, they equivocate some events to God doing. So, if they get something they wished for in a prayer... that's God acting, etc. They put a mind image to the Biblical narrative. But all of these are imaginary experiences. That's not how we experience real relationships with people.
Religion tends to blur the line in a since between imaginary and real to the point where people can't tell the difference. So, things like "Let the Holy Spirit lead you" is an imaginary concept that people cast on some real events.
Another distinction that is blurred is the fact that we do have a multi-functional mind. Our brain functions on conscious and unconscious level. Thus there are constant signals that our nervous system sends us that warn or demand certain things. There are always some information being processed and ends up surfacing as a conscious thought.
For example, we may sit and think that we are hungry, and that's not a decision that we've made. It's a combination signal that we get from our subconscious mind and the "nervous sensors" of the stomach, or other sensors in our body. All of that is a part of the "human mind".
But, it's very easy to label the subconscious experiences... the ones that one part of our selves talking to other... as some sort of the "divine" in a sense of urge to do something, to say something, or to avoid something. These tend to surface when body is in a "trance state"... when subconscious "autopilot" system takes over the conscious one.
Thus many of the "God" type of experiences actually derive from failure to understand that there's more to "me" than what I immediately perceive.
Coming back to the OP, there's virtually no education coming from the pulpit about the honest reality of this subject matter, primarily because a vast majority of "religious experience" relies on conflating subconscious with "Holy Spirit" or God-speak, and imaginary concepts with reality.
Again, I'm not against the honest discussion about the nature of reality and possibility of God, etc, but much of what I hear from the pulpit is structured around a rather dishonest (perhaps unintentionally) methods of failing to define reality vs concepts of reality, and subconscious self vs some supernatural influence.