Leaderboard

I'm not saying we shouldn't study and talk about prophecy - we should; especially if it is our passion. I'm just saying that when we do, we should at least try not to be dogmatic where "I'm right and you're wrong". Take a look at the "3 Angels" thread if you want to see what I'm talking about. No; I don't want the "secret rapture" to be the main teaching out there. I truly believe there will be a rapture ("translation") at some time; and it will NOT be a secret! I have my ideas of when it will take place and where we will go. But it is my "opinion" rather than my "divine revelation".

OK - so how 'bout if I just say that I DON'T KNOW for absolutely certain - couldn't be anything else but - sure how the prophecies concerning the last days will play out. I say that from my study, at this point in time, this is where I feel the weight of the evidence is pointing. 'Cause if we don't talk about the prophecies AT ALL, then those who are teaching a "secret rapture" and such will be the only ones teaching. Is THAT all we want folks to hear?

I wonder if "Christians" will support her cause in the same way they supported the Christian bakers. My guess is that they won't for cultural reasons not religious reasons.

Hillary demands US build a fence. http://conservativevideos.com/hillary-demanded-us-build-fence-mexican-border-video/ I am not so sure we would know which one would. It is a little funny that Donald Trump has been called a bully and those that might vote for him are closet bullies. Which Hillary is telling the truth ?

About 10 years ago I was in New York City with a friend riding the subway. A man and a woman came on, and we offered them our seats but they refused and just stood in front of us. Their discussion showed that they worked in theater. They would occasionally look at us and smile and when we got off they thanked us for the offer of the seat when they came on. As we left the subway my friend said to me "Didn't you recognize who that man was?" I replied "No" and he said "That was Gene Wilder" I was use to only seeing him younger, but realized how much he looked like him only older than the picture in my mind. of course I'm not positive but it could have been him.

It is alleged that she was told that only Muslim women have a right to cover their hair for a license photo. If that is true, there is a violation of her rights as established in case law and the 1st Amendment. However, she should be expected to establish that she is sincere, and basically under the same standards that apply to Muslim women. Has she done that? Was she allowed to do that? Of course, if the standards are low for Muslim women, they also should be for her.

I've been asking myself since yesterday IF there was any part of the law that WAS "all" fulfilled. And I would have to say YES - the Law of Sacrifices. The Law of Sacrifices, had existed from the gate of Eden, and it WAS "all" (completely and totally) fulfilled in the death of Jesus. Jesus is not going to die again during the coming fulfillment of the Fall Feasts. He will be acting as High Priest on the coming Day of Atonement, but He will NOT die again. I think that was the point being made in the Letter to the Hebrews. And a thought occurred to me last night. That veil, 3 inches thick and 80 ft high, at the entrance to the Temple - on that veil was a gorgeous depiction of "heaven and earth". That veil was torn in two by God the Father, when Jesus died. Thus - "heaven and earth" did "pass". Jesus did NOT SAY "the law will not pass til all is fulfilled'. He said "one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law". His words suggest that some PART of the Law will "pass" out of the Law as a whole. That PART is the Law of Sacrifices. Because that PART was "all" fulfilled. That PART is not the Feasts because they were NOT "all" fulfilled. Jesus still has His part to play as High Priest in the coming Fall Feasts. And the Feasts will be kept in the New Earth - as memorials of the great events in God's plan of salvation.

osted 4 minutes ago · Report post August 29, 2016 Shock video: Jesse Jackson gushes with praise for Donald Trump A C-SPAN video documents at least one, if not two, Push Coalition forums from as early as 1998 that focused on Wall Street, minority business executives, and the black community, honoring those who’ve made a difference. In addition to one other notable individual, the clips feature Jesse Jackson. (I know. Hang in there with me.) Who is the other notable person being honored at the gathering? Donald J. Trump. Why? Because of his support of and investment in the black community. Jesse Jackson was absolutely gushing with praise for Trump, whose work crews comprised a disproportionately high percentage of black and Hispanic builders, stating: Let me bring forth a friend who has, well, he is deceptive in his social style [inaudible], one can miss his seriousness and his commitment for the success is beyond argument…He has a sense of the curious and a will to make things better. Jackson went on to enumerate various ways that Trump had shown himself to be a genuine partner in promoting inclusivity and helping those living in underserved communities. Never in my life did I think I would be quoting Jesse Jackson, but there it is. As loud as Trump can be, in his own quiet way (as described by Ivanka Trump at the GOP convention in Cleveland), he helps people, provides jobs, reaches out, and tries to make thing better. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08 Like this Quote Edit

If someone were weighing voting for Hillary Clinton it might be confusing trying to decide which version was true. The impeccably honest and ethical President or the candidate. What liberal would question Jessie Jackson's praise? What honest transparent words of Obama is a potential voter for Hillary Clinton supposed to believe. The one where he calls her a liar that will say anything to get elected among other very unflattering words or the honest transparent president that praises her qualifications?

Blood type= my guess is O+ Sir Arthur Conan Doyle= Sherlock Holmes