Aubrey asked in the post below:
Generally there two: The number of baptisms and the ability to engage with a congregation in a positive manner.
Baptisms become problematic in that young pastors are often not placed in situations where there are likely to be a large number of people who convert.
Back in our ancient history we ordained people who were medical missionaries overseas. Such neither pastored congregations nor were they personally converting people.
I am aware of a somewhat recent situation in which the man stated that he would never pastor a congregation. His primary function was to lead a group of High school students in selling, door to door, SDA publications. He was ordained as SDA clergy. At a later time when his position with the students was taken away from him, he refused an offer to pastor a congregation.
We have ordained people simply because we wanted to place them in an elected, or appointed, position where some would expect them to be ordained.
Stan's denominational positon is such that it has often been held by an ordained person, but not always.
Auburey the bottom line is that we have not been consistent. And, we have not treated everyone the same. In some respects I agree with this as I believe that we should leave it possible for God to lead us. But, in other ways I do not believe that God has had much to do with our decisions.
NOTE: In my response, I have focused on the NAD. I have not spoken to situations in other countries.