Jump to content
ClubAdventist

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/12/2019 in all areas

  1. 8thdaypriest

    Under Law

    I understand it as specifically those things that would prevent Gentile converts from worshiping with Jews, or enjoying fellowship with Jews. Paul specifically mentions the "wall of separation" - referring to the wall beyond which uncircumcised Gentiles could not advance into an inner court before the Temple at Jerusalem to offer a sacrifice. Ephesians 2:14 "For he is our peace, the one who made both groups into one and who destroyed the middle wall of partition, the hostility, 15 when he nullified in his flesh the law of commandments in decrees. He did this to create in himself one new man out of two, thus making peace (NET). This "decrees" or "ordinances" came from the "Oral Torah" traditions, which forbade Jews even to eat with Gentiles. They took the prophecy of Ezekiel 44:7-9, of the LORD's future Temple and applied it literally, forbidding uncircumcised Gentile men from entering the courtyard where sacrifices were presented. Peter indirectly refers to that "law" when he meets Cornelius. "Then he said to them, 'You know how for a unlawful it is for a Jewish man to keep company with or go to one of another nation. But God has shown me that I should not call any man common or unclean." (Acts 10:28) Peter reverted back to that rule in Gal 2:12 and Paul roundly rebuked him. Galatians 2:12 for before certain men came from James, he would eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision. (NKJ) There was also Ezra 9:12. "Now therefore, do not give your daughters as wives for their sons, nor take their daughters to your sons; and never seek their peace or prosperity, that you may be strong and eat the good of the land, and leave it as an inheritance to your children forever." But Paul also strongly condemned marriage between Christians and unbelievers. So that one really didn't go away." In my opinion, "the former commandment" that was weak and unprofitable after Christ died, was the system of animal sacrifices offered through the Aaronic priesthood at the Temple of Jerusalem. Hebrews 7:18 "For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness," That unprofitable former commandment would not include the Ten Commands, which include the Rest of the 7th Day. That Rest is "profitable" and will last for eternity. (Isa 66:22-23). That Rest was instituted before sin.
    1 point
  2. Gustave

    Under Law

    Yes, that's my point. The group of Pharisee Christians were insisting that the new Gentile converts coming into the Church 1st needed to be circumcised and then start observing the Law of Moses. That's means everything, the food laws, the Liturgical Calendar to include the weekly Sabbath's, everything. The Holy Spirit acting through the Apostles said NO, no need to do all of that,
    1 point
If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...