Leaderboard

Thanks for posting this link. Serious students of the Bible should give it careful consideration and do more study of their own in this area. Dr. Reis has correctly pointed out some of the errors involved with trying to derive a "year-day principle" from Numbers 14, Ezekiel 4, and Daniel 9. Most applications of the "year-day principle" of prophetic interpretation involve enthusiastic speculation, rather than careful Bible study. Sadly, most students of Bible prophecy continue to set aside the principles of interpretation that are actually taught within Scripture and insert in their place man-made assertions that contradict the word of God.

My wife and I had the great opportunity to see the president this week and I know how much you like President Trump so I made this video for you! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMjl6WPPY-0 Sorry, spelled your name wrong.

AH already had a $1.0 Billion insurance policy. Why do they need more? And why won't they reveal for what they would use the extra $27 Million? (Frankly, the "mystery" doesn't surprise me..)

Greetings again stinsonmarri, I appreciate your response. I find your comments interesting, but as I am not a SDA I am not sure whether what you say is standard SDA concepts, or your own variations. I recognise a few SDA items from my partial contact with the SDAs and their teaching. As far as this thread is concerned I have a different view to SDAs of the 2300 years as I have stated in previous posts. If you have a copy of the book “SDAs answer Questions on Doctrine”, page 478 mentions three premillennialist groups. Those that believed that the earth will be desolate for the 1000 years and SDAs followed this view, and others that believe that the earth will be populated during the 1000 years, and only some of these believed in the restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land and their conversion at the return of Jesus. I believe the same as this latter group. The Scriptures clearly teach that when Jesus ascended he sat down at the right hand of God in heaven. Thus Jesus was in the Most Holy when he ascended, not in AD 1843 or 1888. Another perspective is that Jesus is the embodiment of the Most Holy Place, and all the details of the Most Holy Place and Temple are fulfilled in Jesus. Kind regards Trevor

You know I agree especial the person in the WH made pedophillia comments about his own daughter. When Donald Trump was watching his 16-year-old daughter Ivanka host the 1997 Miss Teen USA pageant, he turned to the then-Miss Universe and asked: “Don’t you think my daughter’s hot? She’s hot, right?” That anecdote, told to the New York Times by Brook Antoinette Mahealani Lee, appears to be the first recorded incident of the Republican presidential candidate and reality TV star making comments about his daughter’s body which those present have deemed inappropriate. In the almost 20 years since Mr. Trump has called his eldest daughter “voluptuous”. He’s said it’s OK to describe her as “a piece of a**”, though she is a senior executive in his business empire. And he’s said that, if she wasn’t his daughter, “perhaps [he’d] be dating her.” Independent Digital News & Media Limited 9 Donald Trump Quotes About Ivanka That Are Super Uncomfortable; elitedaily I could name a whole bunch more! Now, like I said we agree not only is it a sexual deviancy; but a sin including homosexual acts. You are so right what immorality right! You see we agree on something about the man in the WH! Happy Sabbath!

That's where you are not correct, I stated his immoral action as you did Clinton or Nixon. They both did immoral sins: they lied, Clinton committed adultery and Nixon stole. That is breaking the Moral Law. Now, there is one who is totally corrupt, which has nothing to do with his political views at all. He lies, cusses, cheats on all three of his wives, he hates, and he said he would kill. What is political about that? Nothing! Here is the problem I see, it is all right to have a person to do corrupt things because he is a Republican but not so with Clinton because he's a Democrat? That is ridiculous sin is sin! To tell you the truth I like Nixon he did some good things for minorities. But the Bible said be sure your sins will find you out and it did with him, Clinton and the man who says blasphemy things. What we are not to speak out about his sins because he's the president? Well if the Bible can speak out about kings that sinned, surely we can and you all do only if they are Democrats. But woe to us who speak out what the man in the WH is doing wrong that has nothing to do with politics at all. I am truly tired of it and I going to call sin by its right name! You know I have commented on Clinton here in this forum and I do not take up for anyone, I don't care who it is including me. If you wrong and go against YAHWEH'S Law then I will speak out. Please stop making out that just because you like him politically and look over his immoral acts that I have to tread softly. Not anymore! Please do me a favor show me is his sins different then others? Do he walk around with golden sins and others can be condemn and not him? WRONG! That's the main problem you all let him get away with his sins because of your own political posturing and not me. It sad you condemn the whole world but not one man who does nothing but corrupt things! Go figure! My party does not come before my faith! I don't agree with everything in any party. But, I accept more of the views of the Democrat, that has nothing to do with the Bible or sin! I come here to stand up for truth even when I fail! So please stop accusing me of politic about this man when out clearly point out his immoral act! Thank You! Blessings!