I am no fan of the current White House tenant, although I do find him immensely entertaining. I'm not a Unitedstatesian so I do try to avoid opinions on US domestic politics, but I do note that in most elections in most countries there are usually 2 reasonable contenders for high office. In many countries a vote for a non-contending 3rd party can be meaningful as such 3rd (or 4th or 5th, etc.) parties have influence in the legislature. But in the US this option is largely illusory. So the choice in November 2016 was between 2 immoral, fallible human beings with different styles, approaches, qualities, faults, etc.
One would do well to ponder the wisdom of Alexandr Solzhenitsyn from The Gulag Archipelago
"If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" This statement coincides with Jesus' view expressed in Luke 18:19, and St. Paul's numerous references to his own depravity.
Given the choices available to United States citizens in 2016 it is not reasonable to proclaim that Adventists must have perforce preferred one of the options to the other.
Now many would like to split the SDA church in the United States along political lines, with one side supporting Trump, Doug Batchelor, male headship, and the oil industry and the other supporting an unnamed Democrat, Dan Jackson, Sandra Roberts, Women's ordination and environmental consciousness. A handful on both sides think the church isn't big enough for everyone. Why support for Trump and views on climate science should correlate with support for male headship, and why opposite views on such unrelated issues similarly correlate, is a mystery. I suspect such correlation is related to the need of some folks to have an identity.
A handful from the Trump/male headship/no climate change gang shared the view up to about a week ago that the covid-19 measures were excessive (they usually refer to it as the Wuhan virus or the China virus to identify themselves as an acolyte of the president). Again, why views on the virus ought to correlate with one's views on taxation or abortion has no explanation other than the need to belong to a group.
Fortunately, many people on both sides of the USA political divide have lined up to support the public health measures implemented to combat the spread of covid-19 and correctly see that (a) it is not a left/right issue; (b) it is not a state power grad; (c) it is not a "test-run" on state control for the dreaded "Sunday Law" that some still think is coming; (d) it is not an attack on the church.
If you want to have a laugh, in this short video, Ken Copeland declared America healed of the Covid-19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSIrQBGfUtw