HCH", the fact that Clinton was not rebuked publicly does not mean that he was not rebuked. Maybe he was. Maybe he was not, I do not know. The point is, you also do not know. No reputable historian would conclude as you have done based upon the evidence, which is none. It is speculation, even if true. It further demonstrates your willingness conclude based upon, at best, a paucity of evidence. You will note that I attempt to give you the benefit of the doubt by even suggesting a paucity of evidence..