Leaderboard

Slawek has posted a lot of information that is simply healthy living and that promotes good health. In addition, he has posted good information related to healing and recovery from illness. However, the advice that he has posted should never be considered to be a prescription for the clinical care of a person diagnosed with the COVID-19 virus. The COVID-19 virus causes an illness that can results in death. The clinical care and management of a person infected with the COVID-19 virus must be under the management of a qualified physician, informed as to the required treatment of such a person. This forum welcomes posts that provide information related to healthy living. Included in this may be people who discuss their experiences with an illness and its consequent clinical care. However, it does not welcome clinical diagnosis and treatment by people not qualified and licensed to provide such care. So, if you want to post that drinking a quart of household bleach will cure one of the Covid-19 virus, you will need to find some other place to post such.

First, YAHSHUA never talked to a Jew. That word was created by Europeans in the middle Ages. Malina has some support in this translation from a leading scholar of the ancient historian Josephus. Steve Mason, another participant in this forum, suggests the translation of “Judeans” for the Greek term Ioudaioi in Josephus’s writings. The trouble is that the Greek word Ioudaios is not just one thing or another. It has multiple senses and we have to make a call on how to translate this word. Strictly speaking, “Jew,” in English, is just a contraction (i.e., “Ju”) of the term that in western Europe became dispersed into other tongues via Latin: Judeus. The Greek word Ioudaios is a rendering of Hebrew Yehudi, or Aramaic Yehuda`i, a term essentially defining the ethnic group descended from the patriarch Judah, who gave his name to their tribal territory, Judah, which was then expanded through conquest in the 2nd and 1st centuries BCE and designated in Latin as “Judea.” The Ioudaioi are indeed Judeans. People could be included within the Judean ethnic group (ethnos) by marriage and/or by following Jewish/Judean law. “Judean” and “Jew”, Jesus and Paul – Joan Taylor This Yudean did not start until after the fall of the Temple and the Pharisees took over. This is Rabbinical Judean and not during the time of YAHSHUA. YAHSHUA has always named HIS people IsraEL since the time that Jacob overcame his sins. That was the night he wrestle with THE ANGEL. The word IsraEL mean to overcome and all who now will be called IsraEL. They will go overcome like IsraEL son's. They are called IsraEL in Rev 7. YAHWEH said my people shall all be a part of HIS HOUSE! All will take on this name who overcome. All HE told Peter was that he would lead the disciples and he did. Then James did after Peter but no where did Peter get the honor of always being over the assembly YAHSHUA is THE FOUNDATION, THE CORNERSTONE. No earthly sinful man could have that privilege except THE ONE who came and died, without sin. Please read your Bible

The Assyrians were Semitic and I did not realize that they were put in the list. I believe in providing the truth so I want to make this known. Because of the close relationship between Ham's children and Shem's children and the Phoenician and Canaanite language many would think that the Assyrians were black but they were not. They just as stated adopted the Afrikan language. Many of the Afrikan people also became ruler at time of the kingdom of Shem's children, especially the Cushites. They are known to rule in Elam. We have thus fixed the locality of the people designated by the word "Elam" to the region on the left or east bank of the Tigris; opposite Babylonia, and lying between that country and Persia proper. But a few words must be added with respect to the people themselves. We find the tract in question designated by different names. Sometimes it is called Kissia; sometimes Elam, or Elymais. The first of these names is a mere derivative from the name of the capital, Susa; but the other two indicate the fact that the country was inhabited by two distinct races. The Elamites or Elymaens were probably the earlier incomes, and from them the tract was called Elymais. They were subsequently overrun and conquered by the Kissians or Cossaeans (Cushites), who became the governing race, and called the country after themselves, Kissia. We find the two classes of inhabitants mentioned together in the book of Ezra (chapter. iv. 9), and they even continued separate and distinct to the time of Strabo. Origin of Nations, p. 1, George Rawlinson I hope that clear up the mistake and show the true evidence found in history that keeps the same facts from the Bible. Blessings

? Mat 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

For those who may feel that my position on the statement in GC 334-335 undermines the authority of Ellen White, I strongly encourage you to read the Appendices to Selected Messages, volume 3, pages 433-450. See also the Introduction to The Great Controversy, which touches more generally on these themes in Ellen White’s own words. […] The post Ellen White and the Trumpets II (EWB 15) appeared first on Jon Paulien's Blog. View the full article

Pastor: since I feel I can explain to you that the Hebrew or semitic language comes through racial concept. It is not correct. I also feel it demeans Black people that Black's treated Paleo Hebrew as a language and that we use THE NAME OF YAHSHUA instead of Jesus. Neither are these concept true at all. This is systematic racism because a lie has been planted that are not true. We will get to THE NAME later. The first problem is not truly accepting who the Canaanites were or the lie on Ham. And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. Gen 9:21-25 The Hebrew word "ebed" was used in Gen 9:25 and also in Joshua 1:1 but yet it is amazing how White Bible scholars tried to explain the word differently from the two people Canaan and Moses! The word servant used for Moses is Ehbed and indicates ownership. It is often used as a term to describe a bond-servant or a slave who has been set free by the owner but chooses to remain with his owner and serve him out of love and devotion. Servant of servants is Ehbed of Ehbed and shows us that the consequences of the sin of Canaan will be that he is destined to never again serve his true master YAHWEH but instead will be forced to only serve other servants. He will not choose to serve out of love and devotion but will be forced to serve out of duty. He will be the lowest of servants. Servant of servants is Ehbed of Ehbed and shows us that the consequences of the sin of Canaan will be that he is destined to never again serve his true master YAHWEH, but instead will be forced to only serve other servants. He will not choose to serve out of love and devotion but will be forced to serve out of duty. He will be the lowest of servants. The Mystery in Ehbed and Sharath: by Steve Phillips First let's be clear the Bible never said that Canaan sin but that Noah knew what he had done. The words "unto him," was place there! Gen 9:24 And NoahH5146 awokeH3364 from his wine,H4480 H3196 and knewH3045 (H853) whatH834 his youngerH6996 sonH1121 had doneH6213 unto him. The Bible never told what he did and it made it very clear that he would be servant of servant to his brothers, and servants to both his uncles. Not once did it ever say that YAHWEH condemn Canaan. I suspect recently that YAHWEH came to Canaan first because it was Noah who got drunk and was naked. No ones mention that at all! As for Ham, he saw that his father was naked and call his brothers to get clothing for his father and they did. We need to stop speculating on what took place in that tent. And deal with what was provided. We know that Canaan was there and his father came in and saw that his father was naked and he did the right thing. There was nothing to cover him up and he call his brother's who was without, to get something to cover Noah up! End of story! First, it should be noted -- it is often not -- that these folktales are concerned with skin color, not race. Ham’s progeny, the Bible tells us, comprised different ethnic groups: Egyptians, Libyans, Canaanites, Ethiopians. Still, the idea that dark skin is a punishment for a sinful act is disturbing to our 20th-century western ears. THE CURSE OF HAM: A CASE OF RABBINIC RACISM? David M. Goldenberg Moving on the Canaanites were servants of THE MOST HIGH first and everyone need to accept this because the Bible proves it. But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. In the same day YAHWEH made a Covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites. Gen 15:16, 18-21 WOY Let's use another modern verse to make it very clear: After four generations your people will come to this land again and defeat the Amorites. That will happen in the future because the Amorites are not yet guilty enough to lose their land." So on that day YAHWEH made a promise and an agreement with Abram. He said, "I will give this land to your descendants. I will give them the land between the River of Egypt and the great river Euphrates. This is the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites, and Jebusites." Gen 15:16 , 18-21 So, the Bible made it clear that the Canaanites, Ham youngest son, Black people would have 430 years to get the act together, meaning their sinful act or their land would be taken and given to the Hebrews. Nothing is mention about language. There is Biblical prove that the Canaanites was at one time a righteous group of people. Abraham lie the second time to a righteous Canaanite King about his wife. Read Gen Chapter 20. When Abraham and the Amorites bought back the people of Sodom and his nephew, Gen 14:12,13. The king of Sodom stood with the High Priest and he knew that Abraham was given Melchizedek tithing that he had return to YAHWEH, Gen 14:17-24. When Solomon Temple was built, it shows clearly that the Phoenician King knew YAHWEH, 2Ch 2:11, 12 ! Now, we come to the language was it Semitic or was it Hamitic that the Canaanites wrote and spoke as well as Abraham? A close examination of many books and articles on the history of ancient Israel reveals that most authors, in their construction of the history of ancient Israel followed the process that I would like to call “biblical de-Africanization.” Despite the fact that no nation was mentioned so frequently (1417 times) in the Old Testament, like that of Africa and Africans, except Israel themselves, the presence of Africa and Africans and their political, social, religious, military, and economic contributions are either neglected or minimized or even reduced to slavery. David T. Adamo, Africa and Africans in the Old Testament p. 1-6 Next we have a Hamitic group of nations (Gen. 10:6-20). Ham had four sons named Cush, Egypt (Mizraim), Put and Canaan. the eldest son, Cush, had a son called Nimrod, who established "Babel, Erech, and Accad, all of them in the land of Shinar." Now the difficulty is that the people of this area spoke Akkadian, which was unfortunately called a Semitic language, as were Hebrew and Arabic. Beginning with A.L.Schlozer (1781) scholars assumed that since Abraham was a Shemite, and he spoke Hebrew, Hebrew should be called a Semitic language. Then Arabic, Akkadian, Phoenician, Canaanite, and Moabite were also found to be of this group, so they too were called Semitic languages. The Table of Nations also suggests that the Casluhim were the ancestors of the Philistines and Minoans (Caphtorim) of Crete (see Deuteronomy 2:23, Jeremiah 47:4, Amos 9:7), and all these people were descended by genealogy from an Egyptian ancestry (Mizraim). Having despised the biblical terminology, scholars had to put in many years of painstaking work to discover that the Akkadian language of Babylon was related to Canaanites and Phoenician (usually called West Semitic instead of Hamitic). Then it was found that Egyptian had structural similarity to both Canaanite and various African languages like Galla, Somali, and Berber (Alan Gardiner, Egyptian Grammar, 1950, p.2) The two earliest forms of writing were the cuneiform script of the city-states (Uruk and Ur) of Sumer in Mesopotamia, and the hieroglyphs of Egypt. The cuneiform or wedge-shaped script of the ancient Sumerians in Mesopotamia is dated circa 3200 BC. Cuneiform script was inscribed into wet clay which hardened into tablets. The hieroglyphic script of Egypt is dated circa 3000 BC and is largely pictorial in nature with over 2000 symbols written on papyrus. Hieratic was a cursive form of hieroglyphics developed about the same time for priestly writings. A new type of script with about 90-100 signs, documented by ten monumental inscriptions in stone and bronze, dated as early as circa 2000 BC, was unearthed in Byblos from 1928 to 1932 by Maurice Dunand, and is known as the Byblos Syllabary or the Proto-Byblian script. Byblos, Phoenicia (now Lebanon) was known as Gebal in ancient times, as recorded in Joshua 13:5 of the Bible. While the script suggests Egyptian influence, the symbols present syllables rather than pictures, and is likely a precursor of the Phoenician alphabet. The Byblos writings were a linear and horizontal script and written from right to left as the Phoenician alphabet. A bronze spatula found at the site bears two inscriptions, on one side Phoenician letters and on the other side the Proto-Byblian script. A syllabary is a set of written symbols in which each character represents a syllable, for example, a consonant sound followed by a vowel sound. The sarcophagus of Ahiram, King of Byblos about 1250 BC, was unearthed by the French archaeologist Pierre Montet in 1923. The inscription on the tomb was written in the Phoenician script of Byblos and to date is the earliest witness of considerable length to the Phoenician alphabet. Giovanni Garbini. "The Question of the Alphabet," in Sabatino Moscati (ed): The Phoenicians, p. 101-119 Phoenicia is the name given to those city-states that flourished on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea and were identified as centers of maritime trade in ancient times. Families began to inhabit the land around Byblos about 6000 BC. The Phoenicians were a peaceful, seafaring people expert in navigation and trade, and, beginning around 3200 BC, were the first to explore the Mediterranean Sea in boats made of cedar. Protected by the mountains of Lebanon from warring nations, they were able to differentiate from their Canaanite neighbors and form a distinct culture and society, although they still called themselves Canaanites! Byblos, Tyre (2750 BC), and Sidon became main centers of commerce. In the Late Bronze Age (1550 to 1200 BC), Byblos, Tyre, and Ugarit served as trading hubs linking Egypt, Mycenae in Greece, and Mesopotamia. In the ninth century BC, the Phoenician language extended as far north as Cilicia in Asia Minor. Between the ninth and sixth centuries BC, the naval proficiency of the Phoenician mariners established the first trading system to encompass the entire Mediterranean from their homeland, in what is now Lebanon, to their colonies in Cyprus, Carthage, Malta, Sicily, Sardinia, Tangier, and through the Straits of Gibraltar to Cadiz on the Atlantic coast of Spain and Lixus on the Atlantic coast of Morocco. Maria Eugenia Aubet. The Phoenicians and the West It is very clear to those who will stand against systematic prejudice and accept the truth. It makes no sense to state that the word semitic is a international language and falls under the Afrikan an Asians people language who are both Black people. The Asians are the Canaanites and they themselves trace their ancestry back to Sin, the son of Canaan. Descendants of Ham included the Egyptians and Sumerians, who founded the first two great empires of antiquity, as well as other great nations such as the Phoenicians, Hittites, and Canaanites. The modern African tribes and the Mongol tribes (including today the Chinese and Japanese), as well as the American Indians and the South Sea Islanders, are probably dominantly Hamitic in origin. The evidence is tenuous but, of all the names in the Table of Nations, it does seem that two sons of Canaan, Heth (Hittites = Khittae = Cathay) and Sin (Sinites = Sinim = China), are the most likely to have become ancestors of the Oriental peoples. Since it seems reasonable that divine inspiration would include in such a table information concerning the ancestry of all the major streams of human development, it is reasonable to conclude that the Mongoloid peoples (and therefore also the American Indians) have come mostly from the Hamitic line. Bible.org Cuneiform monuments record the name "Khittae", and this may have been modified to Cathay. Archaeologists have noted many similarities between the Hittites and the Mongoloids. The Sinites are an interesting tribe. There is tenuous evidence that they may be the ancestors of the Chinese. Possibly the Sinites migrated east all the way to China. Of the descendants of Ham, Sin and Heth are the two most probable ancestors of the Oriental people. Ca'naan's descendants, according to scripture, "spread abroad" (Gen. 10:18). Of the lines descending from the sons of Noah, these peoples migrated perhaps more than any other. The contributions made by the descendants of Ham, the youngest of the sons of Noah, are staggering. They were the first explorers. They became the first cultivators of the basic food groups. They discovered and invented medicines, and surgical practices. They were the firs to develop fabrics, and the devices used to sew these fabrics. They were the inventors of mathematics, surveying, and navigation. Thus, the following is an attempt at a comprehensive list of the descendants of Ham, the youngest of the three listed sons of Noah: Ethiopians Egyptians Sumerians Babylonians Arvadites Arabians Zemarites Assyrians Hamathites Philistines Phoenicians Sabeans Jebusites Amorites Girgasites Hivites Arkites Sinites https://www.israel-a-history-of.com/sons-of-noah.html That is why Palo Hebrew is used to show that the children of Eber adopted an Afrikan language. Give us the respect that each nations and children of the sons of Noah deserve. When true systemic prejudice is recognized it can be remove by prayer. Now, is the time to check out each of our hearts because there is a work to be done. Those who truly want to be sealed and receive the LATTER RAIN which is THE OUTPOURING of THE HOLY SPIRIT, this truth must be accepted, respected and there must be a coming together because we all are cousins and should love what all have brought that is worthy to the table! Blessings!

Well I read it all and still can't agree!! I believe if Jesus actually wanted Peter to be the leader of the church he would've said right out "Peter I'm going to make you the head of the new church." Sorry don't buy it!!