Leaderboard

Olger: Fulcrum 7, has a ministry that it operates in the manner that it has defined, which differs in some ways from how we have defined the ministry of Club Adventist. It is my wish that CA not become a platform that is critical of other Internet forums. I believe that could happen if CA began to post material from Fulcrum 7. Such posts would invite critical responses t hat I do not believe would benefit either of us. Yes, I am fully aware that CA has some members who value Fulcrum 7. I also am aware that those members may make some minor references to material from Fulcrum 7. Those posts have not violated our standards in Club Adventist. So, I have not objected to their posting. Olger, you are welcome to this forum. In the ancient past you have regularly contributed to Club Adventist and our mission, as we understand it. In such a role, you will continue to be welcomed here. But, I do ask that you will leave Fulcrum 7 to the mission that it believes God has given it, and post in CA in the manner that we understand our mission to be. As to you keeping anything that I might say in your memory, I will leave that entirely to you.

Unfortunately, I do not believe we will be able to have an open discussion on this topic. Prior links to other websites regarding the actions of the Potomac conference have been deleted and apparently only acceptable politically correct websites (ie, those supporting the progressive agenda in the church) will be referred to. Spectrum, as usual, is engaged in another character assassination of someone who does not toe the progressive line. They are doing it to Bohr and have done it to others. This quote from the Spectrum article was concerning: The most recent example is in the Gaithersburg (Maryland) Hispanic church in the Potomac Conference, where Bohr joined church members in defying not only the conference and the pastor, but the standard procedures for inviting speakers into churches. The statement above reminded me of something I saw in a Greek orthodox church one time. The priest told the congregation that the "fathers" had decided and it was their duty to obey. The members of the church in question wanted to hear Stephen Bohr, however, the conference seems to think that they should determine who the members have speak in their church. Never mind that the Potomac conference says nothing to the pride festivities in other conference churches. Never mind that some of these churches were funded by the sacrifice of the members. (This is what happens when you let the conference hold the title to the church that the local members have struggled and sacrificed for to bring about.) Stephen Bohr is a properly credentialed SDA pastor with "no demerits" on his record. There was no valid reason for this kerfluffle to be happening. The Potomac conference is doing to Bohr what the Florida conference did to Doug Batchelor. Bottom line: Stephen Bohr does not support the ordination of women. The Potomac conference is in full on rebellion against the greater church over this matter. So they will cancel him in the Potomac conference.