Parents dub Sept. 8 'Keep Your Kids at Home Day'

[Guest]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Parents dub Sept. 8 'Keep Your Kids at Home Day'

Widespread movement to opt-out of Obama's televised speech to children

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: September 03, 2009

9:33 pm Eastern

By Chelsea Schilling

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Following widespread concern about President Obama's nationally televised address to schoolchildren, many parents and schools are opting to forgo the Sept. 8 speech.

School officials have been asked to take a break from normal educational activities to allow students to view the speech from the president and participate in recommended brainstorming exercises following the broadcast. Obama will give the speech at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Va. The speech is scheduled to broadcast live at 12 noon EST on C-SPAN and at whitehouse.gov.

But parents across the nation are complaining about the speech taking up valuable classroom instruction time and possibly "indoctrinating" young children.

According to a letter from U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, "The president will challenge students to work hard, set educational goals, and take responsibility for their learning. …

"He will also call for a shared responsibility and commitment on the part of students, parents and educators to ensure that every child in every school receives the best education possible so they can compete in the global economy for good jobs and live rewarding and productive lives as American citizens."

Some schools allow parents to opt-out

Donald Phillips, superintendent of California's Poway Unified School District, sent a letter to parents Wednesday announcing that the district "will not be encouraging" teachers to include the viewing of the president's speech as a part of a supplemental classroom learning activity. If teachers choose to do so, they must inform parents by Friday and give them an opportunity to opt-out of the Tuesday broadcast.

Students who opt-out will be assigned alternate learning activities outside of the classroom during the speech and any follow-up discussions.

Additionally, the district is providing a link to a copy of the president's speech so parents may decide whether they want to view it at home with their children.

"We believe the president's address would be the most beneficial if you choose to view it together at home as a family," the memo states. "We believe any discussion with your child or children around the importance of education and goal-setting could be both meaningful and appropriate."

Officials with Texas' Keller Independent School District said they will allow students to view the presidential address. However, a district notice states, "If parents do not want their student(s) to watch the broadcast, parents may dismiss their student(s) during that time and not be penalized." Additionally, the children will not be required to use the United States Education Department materials for suggested brainstorming assignments after the speech. Many Texas school districts are asking parents to contact principals if they do not wish for their children to view the speech while several schools have opted not to show the broadcast.

Stephanie Klick, Tarrant County Republican Party chairwoman, told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that many Texas families are speaking out against plans to air the broadcast in schools.

"We're hearing from parents and grandparents that are not very happy. They really feel like it is political indoctrination," Klick said. "People don't like this. I have heard from some families that are planning to keep their kids home."

The Houston Independent School District has directed principals to give parents advance notice if they are planning lessons around Obama's speech. Parents may opt-out their children. According to a Houston Chronicle report, "Children pulled out of school for the day will cost districts about $35 per child, as state funding for schools is based on daily attendance."

In Utah, school districts are taking precautions ahead of the speech, according to KSL 5 News. Salt Lake City School District is advising schools to have teachers notify parents if they plan on airing the address in class, and then allowing an opt-out. Some principals will be sending home notices if their schools plan to show the speech.

One Utah father told the Deseret News he will pull his four children out of school rather than allow them to watch the Obama broadcast.

"We will go on a picnic and read the Constitution – learn something useful," he said.

Wisconsin school districts have been hearing from concerned parents, according to the Associated Press. Palm Beach County, Fla., public schools may not run the broadcast. In Columbia, Mo., a district spokeswoman said kids won't be seeing the speech at all.

Meanwhile, Atlas Shrugs' Pamela Gellar blasted the White House and the Department of Education for spelling errors in its "Indoctrination Day" announcement, noting that she will keep her children home from school on Sept. 8.

Geller took this screenshot of the announcement:

Geller's screenshot shows misspelling of "schoolchildren."

"Yes, your education tax dollars at work," Geller wrote. "Math, geography, spelling, English – that's for fascists! What's important is junk science, global hoaxes, and the green-colored slave labor market. Live for the sake of 'the man' and like it."

She continued, "Obama, stay away from my children. ... My kids will not be in school on the 8th (and neither should yours)."

Objections to president's speech

Several bloggers discussed their thoughts on the president's address to schoolchildren on the Free Republic website. The following are some comments about the upcoming speech:

I'm so mad right now, I think my head will explode.

You don't mess with people's kids! There's a line, and he'd better no cross it or he will cause a revolution in this country.

This idea reeks of Bill Ayers.

He is treading on very dangerous ground.

Thank God we live in Alaska. That's 8 a.m. up here, and most of the students are still eating breakfast. I'll read the transcript later in case I want to experience nausea.

Why does this have to be a live broadcast? Why must all schools halt at the appointed time to listen to our dear leader? It doesn't accommodate children or the families very well.

Isn't it time for parents to organize a national campaign to pull their kids out of school on that day?

Have you called your local school today to express your opinion about the Obama propaganda video and lesson plan? If not, now is a good time. Even if you do not have children in school, you pay taxes to support it and you have to live with the results of its teachings, so you have a stake in the outcome.

I would keep my kid out for the whole day instead of just a couple of hours – the school districts receive an amount per student based on their daily attendance, so the thing to do is to hit them in the pocketbook, where it hurts.

I will be keeping both of my children out the entire day. Our school district has said they will be airing the speech and also have other activities planned around it. Knowing what some of these school boards and administrators are like, those activities could be more damaging than an Obama speech.

I assume brownshirts will be taking the names of those who opt out.

Several people referred to Sept. 8 as "National Keep Your Kids at Home Day."

The Nationwide Tea Party Coalition announced its "Hall Pass on That" website, with several suggested actions for parents who do not approve of their children participating in the presentation. The coalition offers the following suggestions:

Contact the child's school to find out whether it is participating in the program.

If your child's school is participating, ask what alternatives there are for the children of families who wish for their students to learn about the establishment of the country respective to the Founding Fathers' intentions. Discussions may focus on the Constitution, the definition and actions of a republic and the responsibility of elected leaders to their constituents.

Ask if the school can excuse your child from the presentation and instead receive a DVD of the address and copy of the activity directives to be evaluated by parents at a later date.

Request a meeting with the school board, superintendent and principal to inquire as to why parents were excluded from the decision-making process of this event.

Pre- and post-speech lesson plans

The Education Department has been encouraging teachers to create lesson plans around the speech, using materials provided on the department website.

As WND reported, worksheets provided by the U.S. Department of Education encouraged teachers to ask pre-K through 6th-grade students the following questions:

What is the president trying to tell me to do?

What is the president asking me to do?

What new ideas and actions is the president challenging me to think about?

Students may be asked to write down "key ideas or phrases that are important or personally meaningful, make posters of their goals, create a "supportive community" by sharing those goals with one another.

Junior-high and high-school students may be asked to brainstorm answers to the following questions before the speech:

Why does President Obama want to speak with us today?

How will he inspire us?

How will he challenge us?

What might he say?

They are encouraged to take notes while Obama speaks about personal responsibility, goals or persistence. As part of a "guided discussion," they may talk about what Obama has inspired or challenged them to do.

Fox News reported that the White House is now "rethinking" its course recommendations for students and rewriting its suggestions for student assignments on how to "help the president."

Among the activities suggested for pre-K to 6th grade students were to "write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president" and discuss what "the president wants us to do."

According to the report, the suggestion about writing letters has been changed to: "Write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short-term and long-term education goals. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to make students accountable to their goals."

Lessons prompt concerns about 'illegal activity'

The Texas Justice Foundation warned the proposed '"classroom activities'" for teachers as to how they should handle the president's Sept. 8th speech to American schoolchildren, reveal that illegal activity may occur, if the recommendations are followed."

"The questions, comments, evaluations and analysis that occurs before, during, and after the president's speech will clearly 'reveal information concerning political affiliations' and probably, 'critical appraisals of other individuals with whom the child(ren) has/have close family relationships' (such as parents)," the foundation said in a press release. "This is perhaps one of the greatest invasions of personal privacy and injecting political affiliation into the public school system in the history of the United States."

The group said the speech may violate protections provided in the Pupil Rights Amendment.

"It also violates 34 Code of Federal Regulations Section 98.4[c] [1] and [2] that defines psychological testing as:

(1) Psychiatric or psychological examination or test means a method of obtaining information, including a group activity, that is not directly related to academic instruction and that is designed to elicit information about attitudes, habits, traits, opinions, beliefs or feelings; (emphasis added)

(2) Psychiatric or psychological treatment means an activity involving the planned, systematic use of methods or techniques that are not directly related to academic instruction and that is designed to affect behavioral, emotional, or attitudinal characteristics of an individual or group. (emphasis added)

Texas Justice Foundation warned that the group activities suggested by the Department of Education "are not directly related to academic instruction and that are designed to elicit information about attitudes, habits, traits, opinions, beliefs, or feelings."

"At this time of intense controversy over the president's far-reaching plans to transform America, it is incredible that he would consider using children to advance his political agenda," Justice Foundation President Allan Parker said. "It violates the constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children, federal law and is perhaps the greatest intrusion of a president into the education process in the history of the United States. In the opinion of the Texas Justice Foundation lawyers, it is both morally and legally wrong."

'Public relations tactic gone too far'

Neal McCluskey, associate director of the Center for Educational Freedom, objected to the Obama administration message to schoolchildren in a Cato Institute article titled, "Hey Obama, leave those kids alone."

"It's one thing for a president to encourage all kids to work hard and stay in school – that's a reasonable use of the bully pulpit," McCluskey wrote. "It's another thing entirely, however, to have the U.S. Department of Education send detailed instructions to public schools nationwide on how to glorify the president and the presidency, and push them to drive social change. Frighteningly, this is what President Obama has done."

McCluskey objected to Department of Education-suggested classroom activities for pre-K-6 students encouraging children to make posters setting out "community and country" goals.

"Perhaps even more frightening is the lesson schools are pushed to teach that it is important to listen to 'the president and other elected officials,'" he wrote. "Possibly most distressing of all, though, is guidance that appears explicitly designed to glorify both the presidency and President Obama himself …"

He said the White House is trying to use its power over education to "indoctrinate children, something completely antithetical to a free society."

Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder condemned Obama's speech as a "public relations tactic" that has gone too far.

"I believe that if parents choose to keep their children at home during this presentation, they should be able to do so without any consequences being imposed upon their children," Kinder said. "And if local school districts across Missouri choose not to make this speech mandatory for students, they should not face any penalties for the state or federal government."

Jim Greer, chairman of the Florida Republican Party, said in a statement that he believes Obama's speech may be a platform "to spread" his "socialist ideology."

"As the father of four children, I am absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama's socialist ideology. The idea that school children across our nation will be forced to watch the president justify his plans for government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies, increasing taxes on those who create jobs, and racking up more debt than any other president, is not only infuriating, but goes against beliefs of the majority of Americans, while bypassing American parents through an invasive abuse of power."

He continued, "While I support educating our children to respect both the office of the American president and the value of community service, I do not support using our children as tools to spread liberal propaganda. The address scheduled for Sept. 8, 2009, does not allow for healthy debate on the president's agenda, but rather obligates the youngest children in our public school system to agree with our president's initiatives or be ostracized by their teachers and classmates."

[Neil D]

Is this the video that you are talking about, Richard?

Because if you think that this is an indoctrination film, I would suggest very strongly that you may be mistaken....There is only one message in this film...The message is, that America is hurting and these people vow to fix it as best they can. It is NOT an indoctrination film to give obessance to Obama...It is not a pledge to Obama, but rather to ourselves...

[Guest]

I pledge to be a servant to our president?

Did you even watch the whole thing?

Slavery was abolished a long time ago in this country, but if we're now going to pledge to to be a servant to the president, isn't that kinda like bringing it back?

I thought he was elected to serve us. Got it a little backwards there don't you think?

[Zeta]

I didn't hear anything in the segment indicating that anyone was pledging to serve any president....what I heard were the voices of American pledging to continue to support those issues that are important to them. We pledge to continue to move forward and not to allow bigotry to intercede destroy and divide a nation based on ill conceived ideas of hatred and prejudice.

Yes, Holbrook 'slavery' has been abolished however, some still live in the past with their antiquated ideas about power. Personally, I have evolved and don't pledge to serve any man.

As for, the telecast scheduled by Obama' in the school, "BAD IDEA".

[Neil D]

And what did the very first message come to you on this film...

,,,,They say that the job of the president is the lonelist job...You are not alone.....

And then a bunch of people vow to help....with a variety of things....All of which Obama definitely needs help....

Didn't you see that? Why would you deliberately take the message of this film out of context? If you think that this film is more about servitude, I can not help you....If you can not follow the thinking within the box, how can I help you with thinking outside the box?

[Guest]

I'm pretty sure I didn't ask you for any help.

[Zeta]

Thanks Neil, it seems to me (my opinion) that some strive on any kind controversy..

[Guest]

I didn't hear anything in the segment indicating that anyone was pledging to serve any president....

Go back and watch it again. This time listen.

[Zeta]

No!!!! Holbrook.....You listen...clearly....do not interject your pre-conceived ideas. I can care less if you like or dislike this man

however, let's be clear what is being said. Perhaps you need to watch it again..with your mind open and focused!!!!

I'm no longer wearing blinders. I finally see things just as they are..

Thank you!

[Guest]

Still haven't watched the whole thing huh? What are you afraid of?

[Neil D]

I'm pretty sure I didn't ask you for any help.

....but you sure act like you need help...And when someone takes things out of context, it sure seems that doing so is disingenunous. And Richard, I am sure that you don't want to be that way.

.....So, why begin by distorting the film's message? As Adventists, we are called to be children of truth...The truth is that the President needs help. His is a lonely job. And these people are pledging to help him...He is not calling for thier help...they volunteer their help...He is not a dictator asking/demanding help...This is the people offering to help him...

...Sorry that this interpretation cuts across your thinking...but truth is truth....And I can not deny what this film is saying...And neither should you take it out of context.....

[Guest]

So you really don't think he asked for this? All these people just up and decided to pledge their service to obama? Please!

This is why I say liberals are dangerous people. But I would not presume to try and help you, because it has been my experience that there really isn't much anyone can do. It's really not worth the time spent arguing over it either.

[Amelia]

At time mark 3:17 the guy with all the tattoos states "I pledge to be of service to Barrak Obama" while kissing his biceps.

[Guest]

Yes, and near the end that woman (I can't think of her name) pledges to be a servant to the president.

[Zeta]

Watched it several times. And, yes I am afraid, that there will be others who refuse to take their blinders off,to expand their mind

beyond the limits of their thought process. Because you think it, doesn't mean that you have a clue or viable understanding .

"if you are not part of the solution, perhaps you are part of he problem'. No, Holbrook, I am not afraid....quite courageous(now).

Today, I found something, I thought that I had lost. Through God I am am strong

Be Blessed.

[Amelia]

How is this video different from

Quote:

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.

Thousands entered the Peace Corps after that.

[Guest]

John F. Kennedy said that, and it was a good saying, but President Kennedy did not have his people to go out and get celebrities to pledge alliegance to president Kennedy. He would never have done that. There in lies the difference.

[Neil D]

So, you are saying that President Obama asked these guys to put this film together for him? Obama was the one who, in your view, wanted everyone to pledge service to him? Is that the way you see it?

Will this video altar your opinion?

[Woody]

At time mark 3:17 the guy with all the tattoos states "I pledge to be of service to Barrak Obama" while kissing his biceps.

Unbelieveable. Just Unbelieveable. And this is being shown to our young uns ?

[Woody]

Yes, and near the end that woman (I can't think of her name) pledges to be a servant to the president.

This scares me. A clear sign of the end. We have been warned that this kind of thing would happen in the end times.

This is prophetic happenings. And BO is leading the way.

[Amelia]

As for me and my house, we serve the Lord.

[phkrause]

I just watched this whole thing Richard and I agree that towards the end that's what demi and ashton say. But within the context of what was being said throughout the whole ad. To me its not any different than saying I'm serving my President Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, etc. Its not any different than when Kennedy said "Don't ask what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." I have no problem with this ad at all. I think your reading something into, more than what its really saying.

pk

[Amelia]

Thanks pk for making my point for me.

[Neil D]

What, conservatives? No rebutal?

[CyberGuy]

It is unfortunate that one of the first questions they had after Obamas speech was. "What can you do to assist the president?" This smacks of indoctrination. That question was withdrawn later but to late to make a lot of people including myself wonder what is Obama thinking asking such a question? More so with Obamas problems with the Health Care debate etc.