Jump to content
ClubAdventist

Good Morning + Happy 9-11 to all of U


Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted

....I do not discount the possibility that an airplane was in fact involved.

I think the evidence is convincing if not overwhelming that airplanes were involved at both the Pentagon and the crash site in Penn. The only way to avoid this fairly obvious conclusion is if one decides those videos are fiction and all the witnesses are actors or liars or maybe both.

John 3:16-17

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. [17] For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Paula

    38

  • Dr. Shane

    32

  • Gordon1

    21

  • John317

    20

Posted

The real mystery is why some people believe in conspiracy theories despite the mountain of evidence that they are simply false.

Pastoral Family Counselor... Find me at www.PostumCafe.com 

Author of  Peculiar Christianity

  • Members
Posted

Excellent posts Tom.

phkrause

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Posted

well tom. with Shanksville I believe the plane was shot down... it is the pentagon that I am not fully convinced of... again, why the refusal to show the footage???

Posted

The real mystery is why some people believe in conspiracy theories despite the mountain of evidence that they are simply false.

Because:

Hundreds of people, firefighters, WTC workers (from the basement) and even reporters reported hearing several explosions on the ground level of the building several minutes prior to the collapse (which supports the demolition theory).

Many experts in HIGH RISE STEEL construction (I don't believe that is your area of expertise), Architects and Engineers, and even Harvard Physicists have stated that the science does not support the collapse of the towers.

Eyewitnesses from Shanksville reported seeing a military plane right after flight 93 crashed.

First responders to the Shanksville site reported seeing NO BODIES, and "Just a hole in the ground".

Etc... etc...

So my question is this... why is it that ONLY the evidence that supports the MAINSTREAM account is acceptable? Why is it that any evidence, or eyewitness account that deviates from the official story is automatically discounted as a "CONSPIRACY THEORY" ?!?!?!?!

  • Moderators
Posted

...Hundreds of people, firefighters, WTC workers (from the basement) and even reporters reported hearing several explosions on the ground level of the building several minutes prior to the collapse (which supports the demolition theory).

What other reasons are there for people hearing "explosions" on the ground level? Is it possible that they sounded like they came from the ground level?

Is it possible those explosusion were the resul of the building's structures giving way and breaking and bending?

Was any hard evidence uncovered from the site that proves the bulding had been destroyed by demolition?

Originally Posted By: Paula
Eyewitnesses from Shanksville reported seeing a military plane right after flight 93 crashed.

Any further evidence that a military plane shot the passenger plane down?

Has it been proved from military records that a military plane was in that area at that time?

And even if a military plane shoots down a passanger plane, aren't there parts of the plane and bodies recovered?

Originally Posted By: Paula
First responders to the Shanksville site reported seeing NO BODIES, and "Just a hole in the ground".

Are you saying that there never has been any evidence produced of human bodies and plane parts at the Shanksville sight?

If that is true, what are the explanations for this that have been offered?

Finally, have you heard anything about the co-pilot or pilot on this plane that crashed at Shanksville being an SDA?

John 3:16-17

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. [17] For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.

  • Administrators
Posted

The one witness in that video that relates his first impression of seeing no bodies upon first arriving on the scene is hardly evidence of no bodies or body parts being found or identified. This is of course a major part of the fallacy of these conspiracy theories. They focus on one isolated detail of one person's out of context anecdotal observation and develop a whole speculative theory on that point.

"Absurdity reigns and confusion makes it look good."

"Sinless perfection is such a shallow goal."

"I love God only as much as the person I love the least."

*Forgiveness is always good news. And that is the gospel truth.

(And finally, the ideas expressed above are solely my person views and not that of any organization with which I am associated.)

  • Administrators
Posted

Yes, Tom. Excellent posts. Thanks. Those posts are like a glass of purified ice water served in a desert oasis.

The guy, RKOwens4, that posted those has 56 videos posted on YouTube debunking the 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Much of the research is from:

911myths.com

wtc7lies.googlepages.com

debunking911.com

THe the Consiracy theory junkies have a a whole bunch of videos "debunking" the debunkers...

It's like killing all the roaches and rats in NY. Mission Impossible...

"Absurdity reigns and confusion makes it look good."

"Sinless perfection is such a shallow goal."

"I love God only as much as the person I love the least."

*Forgiveness is always good news. And that is the gospel truth.

(And finally, the ideas expressed above are solely my person views and not that of any organization with which I am associated.)

  • Members
Posted

It's like killing all the roaches and rats in NY. Mission Impossible...

Hey your talking about my home town Tom. :)

Personally I don't think you can kill all the roaches, the rats maybe, but not the roaches.

phkrause

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29;2
Posted

QR frame:

Before this thread falls off the page – allow me to provide its finial.

Three buildings suffer a vertical collapse together – what are the odds? Sheesh! it is so unlikely that to even accept it

strains credulity – except for, well..., except for the conspiracists who’ve accepted that scenario as, get this,

plausible.

What can be said – for such trusting naiveté? Nothing!—it is self-explanatory. (I wish the large-mouth Bass I fish for were so accommodatingly hooked)

No offense, but a diesel tank afire, kerosene, and drywall caused three, read three, buildings to vertically collapse – symmetrically!? Okaayyy... : (

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


If you find some value to this community, please help out with a few dollars per month.



×
×
  • Create New...